- This topic has 176 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 30, 2010 at 6:44 AM #647151December 30, 2010 at 9:49 AM #646100LAAFTERHOURSParticipant
[quote=ocrenter][quote=outtamojo]”SAN MARCOS: San Marcos High students to move off campus Rebuilding campus will take two years”.
http://m.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_5c52cc00-37fc-5479-9214-e790bf0736ca.html
Take THAT Cbad and Lcc- a shiny new campus AND surging test scores : )[/quote]
that’s the power of SEH mello roos![/quote]
Close but this would be the reason http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_3664671e-a9c2-57ba-a3e2-82116566baef.html
I voted against that measure mainly bc it probably wont benefit my family. Hopefully it benefits my home value.
December 30, 2010 at 9:49 AM #646172LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=ocrenter][quote=outtamojo]”SAN MARCOS: San Marcos High students to move off campus Rebuilding campus will take two years”.
http://m.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_5c52cc00-37fc-5479-9214-e790bf0736ca.html
Take THAT Cbad and Lcc- a shiny new campus AND surging test scores : )[/quote]
that’s the power of SEH mello roos![/quote]
Close but this would be the reason http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_3664671e-a9c2-57ba-a3e2-82116566baef.html
I voted against that measure mainly bc it probably wont benefit my family. Hopefully it benefits my home value.
December 30, 2010 at 9:49 AM #646756LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=ocrenter][quote=outtamojo]”SAN MARCOS: San Marcos High students to move off campus Rebuilding campus will take two years”.
http://m.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_5c52cc00-37fc-5479-9214-e790bf0736ca.html
Take THAT Cbad and Lcc- a shiny new campus AND surging test scores : )[/quote]
that’s the power of SEH mello roos![/quote]
Close but this would be the reason http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_3664671e-a9c2-57ba-a3e2-82116566baef.html
I voted against that measure mainly bc it probably wont benefit my family. Hopefully it benefits my home value.
December 30, 2010 at 9:49 AM #646895LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=ocrenter][quote=outtamojo]”SAN MARCOS: San Marcos High students to move off campus Rebuilding campus will take two years”.
http://m.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_5c52cc00-37fc-5479-9214-e790bf0736ca.html
Take THAT Cbad and Lcc- a shiny new campus AND surging test scores : )[/quote]
that’s the power of SEH mello roos![/quote]
Close but this would be the reason http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_3664671e-a9c2-57ba-a3e2-82116566baef.html
I voted against that measure mainly bc it probably wont benefit my family. Hopefully it benefits my home value.
December 30, 2010 at 9:49 AM #647221LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=ocrenter][quote=outtamojo]”SAN MARCOS: San Marcos High students to move off campus Rebuilding campus will take two years”.
http://m.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_5c52cc00-37fc-5479-9214-e790bf0736ca.html
Take THAT Cbad and Lcc- a shiny new campus AND surging test scores : )[/quote]
that’s the power of SEH mello roos![/quote]
Close but this would be the reason http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/san-marcos/article_3664671e-a9c2-57ba-a3e2-82116566baef.html
I voted against that measure mainly bc it probably wont benefit my family. Hopefully it benefits my home value.
December 30, 2010 at 10:15 AM #646130sdrealtorParticipantYes but its sexier to say its because of the Mello roos. With that said, I’d bet all the new higher income families in SEH and similar new home communities were the source of the votes that pushed that proposition through. I dont the retirees at Lake SM or the working class in the lower income areas supported it.
December 30, 2010 at 10:15 AM #646202sdrealtorParticipantYes but its sexier to say its because of the Mello roos. With that said, I’d bet all the new higher income families in SEH and similar new home communities were the source of the votes that pushed that proposition through. I dont the retirees at Lake SM or the working class in the lower income areas supported it.
December 30, 2010 at 10:15 AM #646786sdrealtorParticipantYes but its sexier to say its because of the Mello roos. With that said, I’d bet all the new higher income families in SEH and similar new home communities were the source of the votes that pushed that proposition through. I dont the retirees at Lake SM or the working class in the lower income areas supported it.
December 30, 2010 at 10:15 AM #646925sdrealtorParticipantYes but its sexier to say its because of the Mello roos. With that said, I’d bet all the new higher income families in SEH and similar new home communities were the source of the votes that pushed that proposition through. I dont the retirees at Lake SM or the working class in the lower income areas supported it.
December 30, 2010 at 10:15 AM #647251sdrealtorParticipantYes but its sexier to say its because of the Mello roos. With that said, I’d bet all the new higher income families in SEH and similar new home communities were the source of the votes that pushed that proposition through. I dont the retirees at Lake SM or the working class in the lower income areas supported it.
December 30, 2010 at 10:45 PM #646475waiting for bottomParticipantYes, it was the higher earners in SEH leading the vote, and they will also pay the majority of the bond.
Goodbye LCC as the top HS in the area, hello SMHS. Get used to it 92009, your days are up.
December 30, 2010 at 10:45 PM #646546waiting for bottomParticipantYes, it was the higher earners in SEH leading the vote, and they will also pay the majority of the bond.
Goodbye LCC as the top HS in the area, hello SMHS. Get used to it 92009, your days are up.
December 30, 2010 at 10:45 PM #647133waiting for bottomParticipantYes, it was the higher earners in SEH leading the vote, and they will also pay the majority of the bond.
Goodbye LCC as the top HS in the area, hello SMHS. Get used to it 92009, your days are up.
December 30, 2010 at 10:45 PM #647270waiting for bottomParticipantYes, it was the higher earners in SEH leading the vote, and they will also pay the majority of the bond.
Goodbye LCC as the top HS in the area, hello SMHS. Get used to it 92009, your days are up.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.