How did you vote today on Props 98 and 99?

[no_such_reality]

Prop 98 ends rent control, period, no grandfathring clause, nada. The same term prohibits the government from limiting what you can sell your property for, as loosely written, I wonder if that applies to the pre-agreed to purchase and government support program for low income housing. If so, it’s a crock. I wonder how it is applied to developers with LIH mandates.

Prop 98 is essentially, prop 13 for ED in it’s draconianess. Not surprising Jarvis is a sponsor.

99 is pathetic.

Together they represent what is wrong with the proposition process in California.

The misinformation was rampant.

Perhaps we should sell a few more billion dollars worth of bonds so we can have a $4/month reduction in our electric bills. That worked out great, I love paying an additional $10 a month to TTA (to pay for the bonds0 and getting my $4 mandated 10% reduction. Woohoo!! Let’s save some money!!!

[DoJC]

I voted YES on 98 and NO on 99. Rent control in this state is burdensome and over-regulated and most cities don’t allow for vacancy decontrol. Vacancy decontrol allows you to finally raise a rent up to market value when the person who was under rent control moves out. As long as the person stays in the place for rent, or in the case of mobile homes a relative who takes over upon the death of the family member, the rent can only be raised a very small amount each year. In San Bernardino county that is 80% of the CPI-U, which averages about 3-4% per year.

Long have the cities and municipalities forced rent control on mobile home park owners in an effort to meet their federally mandated targets for providing low-income housing. Hopefully that ends with Prop 98!

– Doug

[DoJC]

I voted YES on 98 and NO on 99. Rent control in this state is burdensome and over-regulated and most cities don’t allow for vacancy decontrol. Vacancy decontrol allows you to finally raise a rent up to market value when the person who was under rent control moves out. As long as the person stays in the place for rent, or in the case of mobile homes a relative who takes over upon the death of the family member, the rent can only be raised a very small amount each year. In San Bernardino county that is 80% of the CPI-U, which averages about 3-4% per year.

Long have the cities and municipalities forced rent control on mobile home park owners in an effort to meet their federally mandated targets for providing low-income housing. Hopefully that ends with Prop 98!

– Doug

[DoJC]

I voted YES on 98 and NO on 99. Rent control in this state is burdensome and over-regulated and most cities don’t allow for vacancy decontrol. Vacancy decontrol allows you to finally raise a rent up to market value when the person who was under rent control moves out. As long as the person stays in the place for rent, or in the case of mobile homes a relative who takes over upon the death of the family member, the rent can only be raised a very small amount each year. In San Bernardino county that is 80% of the CPI-U, which averages about 3-4% per year.

Long have the cities and municipalities forced rent control on mobile home park owners in an effort to meet their federally mandated targets for providing low-income housing. Hopefully that ends with Prop 98!

– Doug

[DoJC]

I voted YES on 98 and NO on 99. Rent control in this state is burdensome and over-regulated and most cities don’t allow for vacancy decontrol. Vacancy decontrol allows you to finally raise a rent up to market value when the person who was under rent control moves out. As long as the person stays in the place for rent, or in the case of mobile homes a relative who takes over upon the death of the family member, the rent can only be raised a very small amount each year. In San Bernardino county that is 80% of the CPI-U, which averages about 3-4% per year.

Long have the cities and municipalities forced rent control on mobile home park owners in an effort to meet their federally mandated targets for providing low-income housing. Hopefully that ends with Prop 98!

– Doug

[DoJC]

I voted YES on 98 and NO on 99. Rent control in this state is burdensome and over-regulated and most cities don’t allow for vacancy decontrol. Vacancy decontrol allows you to finally raise a rent up to market value when the person who was under rent control moves out. As long as the person stays in the place for rent, or in the case of mobile homes a relative who takes over upon the death of the family member, the rent can only be raised a very small amount each year. In San Bernardino county that is 80% of the CPI-U, which averages about 3-4% per year.

Long have the cities and municipalities forced rent control on mobile home park owners in an effort to meet their federally mandated targets for providing low-income housing. Hopefully that ends with Prop 98!

– Doug

[CAwireman]

I too agree with Esmith.

I did the same research and did the absentee ballot several weeks ago.

But any prop that rubs agaisnt the grain of seniors (rent control is a holy grain) might be destined for failure. Why the heck did they attach abolishing rent control as a rider?
It might have handily passed otherwise..

[CAwireman]

I too agree with Esmith.

I did the same research and did the absentee ballot several weeks ago.

But any prop that rubs agaisnt the grain of seniors (rent control is a holy grain) might be destined for failure. Why the heck did they attach abolishing rent control as a rider?
It might have handily passed otherwise..

[CAwireman]

I too agree with Esmith.

I did the same research and did the absentee ballot several weeks ago.

But any prop that rubs agaisnt the grain of seniors (rent control is a holy grain) might be destined for failure. Why the heck did they attach abolishing rent control as a rider?
It might have handily passed otherwise..

[CAwireman]

I too agree with Esmith.

I did the same research and did the absentee ballot several weeks ago.

But any prop that rubs agaisnt the grain of seniors (rent control is a holy grain) might be destined for failure. Why the heck did they attach abolishing rent control as a rider?
It might have handily passed otherwise..

[CAwireman]

I too agree with Esmith.

I did the same research and did the absentee ballot several weeks ago.

But any prop that rubs agaisnt the grain of seniors (rent control is a holy grain) might be destined for failure. Why the heck did they attach abolishing rent control as a rider?
It might have handily passed otherwise..

[Eugene]

Looks like 99 will pass and 98 won’t.

[Eugene]

Looks like 99 will pass and 98 won’t.

[Eugene]

Looks like 99 will pass and 98 won’t.

[Eugene]

Looks like 99 will pass and 98 won’t.

[Author]

Posts