- This topic has 55 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by no_such_reality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 3, 2008 at 11:40 AM #216282June 3, 2008 at 11:52 AM #216136meadandaleParticipant
I’m voting no on both.
I don’t like the rent control provision in 98.
June 3, 2008 at 11:52 AM #216218meadandaleParticipantI’m voting no on both.
I don’t like the rent control provision in 98.
June 3, 2008 at 11:52 AM #216243meadandaleParticipantI’m voting no on both.
I don’t like the rent control provision in 98.
June 3, 2008 at 11:52 AM #216270meadandaleParticipantI’m voting no on both.
I don’t like the rent control provision in 98.
June 3, 2008 at 11:52 AM #216297meadandaleParticipantI’m voting no on both.
I don’t like the rent control provision in 98.
June 3, 2008 at 12:54 PM #216151blahblahblahParticipantNo on 98 and 99.
June 3, 2008 at 12:54 PM #216233blahblahblahParticipantNo on 98 and 99.
June 3, 2008 at 12:54 PM #216258blahblahblahParticipantNo on 98 and 99.
June 3, 2008 at 12:54 PM #216284blahblahblahParticipantNo on 98 and 99.
June 3, 2008 at 12:54 PM #216312blahblahblahParticipantNo on 98 and 99.
June 3, 2008 at 2:30 PM #216222no_such_realityParticipantProp 98 ends rent control, period, no grandfathring clause, nada. The same term prohibits the government from limiting what you can sell your property for, as loosely written, I wonder if that applies to the pre-agreed to purchase and government support program for low income housing. If so, it’s a crock. I wonder how it is applied to developers with LIH mandates.
Prop 98 is essentially, prop 13 for ED in it’s draconianess. Not surprising Jarvis is a sponsor.
99 is pathetic.
Together they represent what is wrong with the proposition process in California.
The misinformation was rampant.
Perhaps we should sell a few more billion dollars worth of bonds so we can have a $4/month reduction in our electric bills. That worked out great, I love paying an additional $10 a month to TTA (to pay for the bonds0 and getting my $4 mandated 10% reduction. Woohoo!! Let’s save some money!!!
June 3, 2008 at 2:30 PM #216305no_such_realityParticipantProp 98 ends rent control, period, no grandfathring clause, nada. The same term prohibits the government from limiting what you can sell your property for, as loosely written, I wonder if that applies to the pre-agreed to purchase and government support program for low income housing. If so, it’s a crock. I wonder how it is applied to developers with LIH mandates.
Prop 98 is essentially, prop 13 for ED in it’s draconianess. Not surprising Jarvis is a sponsor.
99 is pathetic.
Together they represent what is wrong with the proposition process in California.
The misinformation was rampant.
Perhaps we should sell a few more billion dollars worth of bonds so we can have a $4/month reduction in our electric bills. That worked out great, I love paying an additional $10 a month to TTA (to pay for the bonds0 and getting my $4 mandated 10% reduction. Woohoo!! Let’s save some money!!!
June 3, 2008 at 2:30 PM #216330no_such_realityParticipantProp 98 ends rent control, period, no grandfathring clause, nada. The same term prohibits the government from limiting what you can sell your property for, as loosely written, I wonder if that applies to the pre-agreed to purchase and government support program for low income housing. If so, it’s a crock. I wonder how it is applied to developers with LIH mandates.
Prop 98 is essentially, prop 13 for ED in it’s draconianess. Not surprising Jarvis is a sponsor.
99 is pathetic.
Together they represent what is wrong with the proposition process in California.
The misinformation was rampant.
Perhaps we should sell a few more billion dollars worth of bonds so we can have a $4/month reduction in our electric bills. That worked out great, I love paying an additional $10 a month to TTA (to pay for the bonds0 and getting my $4 mandated 10% reduction. Woohoo!! Let’s save some money!!!
June 3, 2008 at 2:30 PM #216353no_such_realityParticipantProp 98 ends rent control, period, no grandfathring clause, nada. The same term prohibits the government from limiting what you can sell your property for, as loosely written, I wonder if that applies to the pre-agreed to purchase and government support program for low income housing. If so, it’s a crock. I wonder how it is applied to developers with LIH mandates.
Prop 98 is essentially, prop 13 for ED in it’s draconianess. Not surprising Jarvis is a sponsor.
99 is pathetic.
Together they represent what is wrong with the proposition process in California.
The misinformation was rampant.
Perhaps we should sell a few more billion dollars worth of bonds so we can have a $4/month reduction in our electric bills. That worked out great, I love paying an additional $10 a month to TTA (to pay for the bonds0 and getting my $4 mandated 10% reduction. Woohoo!! Let’s save some money!!!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.