Gov’t giving you $4500 to trade in your old car,

[DWCAP]

[quote=flu]
I use to not care about the government…But I really fvcking hate this administration making a mockery about personal responsibility, whatever is left of that concept.
(Breath in, breath out, breath in, breath out….)[/quote]

Now come on flu, didnt you know that not loan moding, stimuluating, or flat out subsidizing the American people with rich/future people’s money is akin to being a traitor? What kinda world do you wanna live in anyways? Shouldnt a nice house, nice new car, all you can consume health care, guarenteed job no matter how bad you are, and a 50″ Plasma in every room be every Americans right? If you cannt afford it, shouldnt the government subsidize you until you can! This is America damn it, no one should ever have to suffer the indignity of wanting for anything, weither or not they new they needed it 15 seconds ago or not!

[Zeitgeist]

While Congress scrambles to plug more money into the “cash for clunkers” program, an Obama administration official said today the popular trade-in program is still running.

The House of Representatives will vote today on a measure to add $2 billion from federal stimulus funds to the “cash for clunkers” program, according to the office of U.S. Rep. Bruce Braley. The Waterloo Democrat is an original co-sponsor of the legislation creating the program.

The Senate is expected to take up the measure next week, a spokesman, Jeff Giertz, said.

The “cash for clunkers” initiative, officially called the Car Allowance Rebate System, or CARS, has proved popular with the public.

http://www.qctimes.com/news/local/article_e4a9a922-7de8-11de-ae9d-001cc4c03286.html

[Zeitgeist]

While Congress scrambles to plug more money into the “cash for clunkers” program, an Obama administration official said today the popular trade-in program is still running.

The House of Representatives will vote today on a measure to add $2 billion from federal stimulus funds to the “cash for clunkers” program, according to the office of U.S. Rep. Bruce Braley. The Waterloo Democrat is an original co-sponsor of the legislation creating the program.

The Senate is expected to take up the measure next week, a spokesman, Jeff Giertz, said.

The “cash for clunkers” initiative, officially called the Car Allowance Rebate System, or CARS, has proved popular with the public.

http://www.qctimes.com/news/local/article_e4a9a922-7de8-11de-ae9d-001cc4c03286.html

[Zeitgeist]

While Congress scrambles to plug more money into the “cash for clunkers” program, an Obama administration official said today the popular trade-in program is still running.

The House of Representatives will vote today on a measure to add $2 billion from federal stimulus funds to the “cash for clunkers” program, according to the office of U.S. Rep. Bruce Braley. The Waterloo Democrat is an original co-sponsor of the legislation creating the program.

The Senate is expected to take up the measure next week, a spokesman, Jeff Giertz, said.

The “cash for clunkers” initiative, officially called the Car Allowance Rebate System, or CARS, has proved popular with the public.

http://www.qctimes.com/news/local/article_e4a9a922-7de8-11de-ae9d-001cc4c03286.html

[Zeitgeist]

While Congress scrambles to plug more money into the “cash for clunkers” program, an Obama administration official said today the popular trade-in program is still running.

The House of Representatives will vote today on a measure to add $2 billion from federal stimulus funds to the “cash for clunkers” program, according to the office of U.S. Rep. Bruce Braley. The Waterloo Democrat is an original co-sponsor of the legislation creating the program.

The Senate is expected to take up the measure next week, a spokesman, Jeff Giertz, said.

The “cash for clunkers” initiative, officially called the Car Allowance Rebate System, or CARS, has proved popular with the public.

http://www.qctimes.com/news/local/article_e4a9a922-7de8-11de-ae9d-001cc4c03286.html

[Zeitgeist]

While Congress scrambles to plug more money into the “cash for clunkers” program, an Obama administration official said today the popular trade-in program is still running.

The House of Representatives will vote today on a measure to add $2 billion from federal stimulus funds to the “cash for clunkers” program, according to the office of U.S. Rep. Bruce Braley. The Waterloo Democrat is an original co-sponsor of the legislation creating the program.

The Senate is expected to take up the measure next week, a spokesman, Jeff Giertz, said.

The “cash for clunkers” initiative, officially called the Car Allowance Rebate System, or CARS, has proved popular with the public.

http://www.qctimes.com/news/local/article_e4a9a922-7de8-11de-ae9d-001cc4c03286.html

[briansd1]

[quote=bsrsharma]If it is legal, is there a problem writing it in a contract and may be get it notarized. Perhaps a friendly lawyer can draft the text. Once a boilerplate contract is posted, others can copy it.[/quote]

I don’t think that it’s illegal… But the problem are the sales taxes and use taxes.

When you transfer cars between unrelated individuals, you have to pay use taxes all over again.

I’m all for doing everything that is legal. But I don’t advocate lying to avoid taxes.

[briansd1]

[quote=bsrsharma]If it is legal, is there a problem writing it in a contract and may be get it notarized. Perhaps a friendly lawyer can draft the text. Once a boilerplate contract is posted, others can copy it.[/quote]

I don’t think that it’s illegal… But the problem are the sales taxes and use taxes.

When you transfer cars between unrelated individuals, you have to pay use taxes all over again.

I’m all for doing everything that is legal. But I don’t advocate lying to avoid taxes.

[briansd1]

[quote=bsrsharma]If it is legal, is there a problem writing it in a contract and may be get it notarized. Perhaps a friendly lawyer can draft the text. Once a boilerplate contract is posted, others can copy it.[/quote]

I don’t think that it’s illegal… But the problem are the sales taxes and use taxes.

When you transfer cars between unrelated individuals, you have to pay use taxes all over again.

I’m all for doing everything that is legal. But I don’t advocate lying to avoid taxes.

[briansd1]

[quote=bsrsharma]If it is legal, is there a problem writing it in a contract and may be get it notarized. Perhaps a friendly lawyer can draft the text. Once a boilerplate contract is posted, others can copy it.[/quote]

I don’t think that it’s illegal… But the problem are the sales taxes and use taxes.

When you transfer cars between unrelated individuals, you have to pay use taxes all over again.

I’m all for doing everything that is legal. But I don’t advocate lying to avoid taxes.

[briansd1]

[quote=bsrsharma]If it is legal, is there a problem writing it in a contract and may be get it notarized. Perhaps a friendly lawyer can draft the text. Once a boilerplate contract is posted, others can copy it.[/quote]

I don’t think that it’s illegal… But the problem are the sales taxes and use taxes.

When you transfer cars between unrelated individuals, you have to pay use taxes all over again.

I’m all for doing everything that is legal. But I don’t advocate lying to avoid taxes.

[sdrealtor]

Just saw a report that the offer is pretty much done because they have exhausted all the funds they set aside for it.

Piggs might not have used them but apparently other folks have in massive numbers.

[sdrealtor]

Just saw a report that the offer is pretty much done because they have exhausted all the funds they set aside for it.

Piggs might not have used them but apparently other folks have in massive numbers.

[sdrealtor]

Just saw a report that the offer is pretty much done because they have exhausted all the funds they set aside for it.

Piggs might not have used them but apparently other folks have in massive numbers.

[sdrealtor]

Just saw a report that the offer is pretty much done because they have exhausted all the funds they set aside for it.

Piggs might not have used them but apparently other folks have in massive numbers.

[Author]

Posts