Freedom of speech??

[Anonymous]

[quote=meadandale]Funny, the first amendment says nothing about the first amendment right to free speech applying to ‘humans’ as opposed to corporations.[/quote]

There were no corporations when the Constitution was written.

There were some entities similar to modern corporations in other parts of the world, (e.g. East India Company), but nothing like these existed in the US.

The corporation is a relatively modern concept. Even younger than our country.

[sdduuuude]

The simplest way to eliminate special interests is by limiting what the government can do and limiting the number of things on which they can spend money.

[sdduuuude]

The simplest way to eliminate special interests is by limiting what the government can do and limiting the number of things on which they can spend money.

[sdduuuude]

The simplest way to eliminate special interests is by limiting what the government can do and limiting the number of things on which they can spend money.

[sdduuuude]

The simplest way to eliminate special interests is by limiting what the government can do and limiting the number of things on which they can spend money.

[sdduuuude]

The simplest way to eliminate special interests is by limiting what the government can do and limiting the number of things on which they can spend money.

[Arraya]

The extreme accumulation of wealth ultimately and intrinsically becomes the distortion within the economy. Wealth is power and that power is the capacity to bend a socio-economic system (to one degree or another) to the will of a select few. Capitalism breeds those who destroy its theorized idealistic state by creating the means to do so. Quite the paradox.

[Arraya]

The extreme accumulation of wealth ultimately and intrinsically becomes the distortion within the economy. Wealth is power and that power is the capacity to bend a socio-economic system (to one degree or another) to the will of a select few. Capitalism breeds those who destroy its theorized idealistic state by creating the means to do so. Quite the paradox.

[Arraya]

The extreme accumulation of wealth ultimately and intrinsically becomes the distortion within the economy. Wealth is power and that power is the capacity to bend a socio-economic system (to one degree or another) to the will of a select few. Capitalism breeds those who destroy its theorized idealistic state by creating the means to do so. Quite the paradox.

[Arraya]

The extreme accumulation of wealth ultimately and intrinsically becomes the distortion within the economy. Wealth is power and that power is the capacity to bend a socio-economic system (to one degree or another) to the will of a select few. Capitalism breeds those who destroy its theorized idealistic state by creating the means to do so. Quite the paradox.

[Arraya]

The extreme accumulation of wealth ultimately and intrinsically becomes the distortion within the economy. Wealth is power and that power is the capacity to bend a socio-economic system (to one degree or another) to the will of a select few. Capitalism breeds those who destroy its theorized idealistic state by creating the means to do so. Quite the paradox.

[briansd1]

Arraya, you rail against Capitalism, but what’s the alternative?

Arraya, capitalism is still much more meritocratic than previous absolute rule based on heredity. Capitalism is what brought about the French and American revolutions (because capital weakened the ruling class and provided means to revolutionaries)

Capital eases friction in commerce and creates wealth.

I see the paradox you’re talking about but I can’t think of an alternative.

Capital and our large markets made America rich and powerful. We should be thankful.

The Chinese are now accumulating capital and their voices are much stronger. Eventually their markets will get so large that they will create enormous amounts of capital and wealth. #1 auto market, #1 telecom market, #1 internet market, etc…

In my view, America needs to keep-up by allowing nearly free immigration so we can grow our population and our economy. Sure, our existing citizens will have more competition, but we will bring wealth and liberty to millions while strengthening our financial (and military) wherewithal to spread our ideals.

[briansd1]

Arraya, you rail against Capitalism, but what’s the alternative?

Arraya, capitalism is still much more meritocratic than previous absolute rule based on heredity. Capitalism is what brought about the French and American revolutions (because capital weakened the ruling class and provided means to revolutionaries)

Capital eases friction in commerce and creates wealth.

I see the paradox you’re talking about but I can’t think of an alternative.

Capital and our large markets made America rich and powerful. We should be thankful.

The Chinese are now accumulating capital and their voices are much stronger. Eventually their markets will get so large that they will create enormous amounts of capital and wealth. #1 auto market, #1 telecom market, #1 internet market, etc…

In my view, America needs to keep-up by allowing nearly free immigration so we can grow our population and our economy. Sure, our existing citizens will have more competition, but we will bring wealth and liberty to millions while strengthening our financial (and military) wherewithal to spread our ideals.

[briansd1]

Arraya, you rail against Capitalism, but what’s the alternative?

Arraya, capitalism is still much more meritocratic than previous absolute rule based on heredity. Capitalism is what brought about the French and American revolutions (because capital weakened the ruling class and provided means to revolutionaries)

Capital eases friction in commerce and creates wealth.

I see the paradox you’re talking about but I can’t think of an alternative.

Capital and our large markets made America rich and powerful. We should be thankful.

The Chinese are now accumulating capital and their voices are much stronger. Eventually their markets will get so large that they will create enormous amounts of capital and wealth. #1 auto market, #1 telecom market, #1 internet market, etc…

In my view, America needs to keep-up by allowing nearly free immigration so we can grow our population and our economy. Sure, our existing citizens will have more competition, but we will bring wealth and liberty to millions while strengthening our financial (and military) wherewithal to spread our ideals.

[briansd1]

Arraya, you rail against Capitalism, but what’s the alternative?

Arraya, capitalism is still much more meritocratic than previous absolute rule based on heredity. Capitalism is what brought about the French and American revolutions (because capital weakened the ruling class and provided means to revolutionaries)

Capital eases friction in commerce and creates wealth.

I see the paradox you’re talking about but I can’t think of an alternative.

Capital and our large markets made America rich and powerful. We should be thankful.

The Chinese are now accumulating capital and their voices are much stronger. Eventually their markets will get so large that they will create enormous amounts of capital and wealth. #1 auto market, #1 telecom market, #1 internet market, etc…

In my view, America needs to keep-up by allowing nearly free immigration so we can grow our population and our economy. Sure, our existing citizens will have more competition, but we will bring wealth and liberty to millions while strengthening our financial (and military) wherewithal to spread our ideals.

[Author]

Posts