Freedom of speech??

[Arraya]

Lewis Black said it best a few years ago. He said that it used to be that the government and the corporations were screwing each other, but they kept it out of sight, like hotel sex. You knew somebody was screwing, but you didn’t know where.

Now, they do right out in the open like two dogs that are permanently attached to one another

[scaredyclassic]

i like it better out in the open.

[scaredyclassic]

i like it better out in the open.

[scaredyclassic]

i like it better out in the open.

[scaredyclassic]

i like it better out in the open.

[scaredyclassic]

i like it better out in the open.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[Author]

Posts