Freedom of speech??

[dbapig]

[quote=pri_dk]I’m pretty sure this decision is universally unpopular with members of both parties (with the exception of incumbent politicians, CEOs, union leaders, etc.)

It offers nothing to Joe public, regardless of his political viewpoint.

Perhaps a Constitutional amendment is in order?

It’s been a while since we had one…[/quote]

I’m for it. It’s such an obvious concept, a human being =! corporation. And Free Speech is for human beings.

I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.

[dbapig]

Starting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.

“No taxation without representation”

With this new ruling here’s the new chant.

“Real Representation only with $$$$$”

Awesome, it’s getting better and better.

[dbapig]

Starting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.

“No taxation without representation”

With this new ruling here’s the new chant.

“Real Representation only with $$$$$”

Awesome, it’s getting better and better.

[dbapig]

Starting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.

“No taxation without representation”

With this new ruling here’s the new chant.

“Real Representation only with $$$$$”

Awesome, it’s getting better and better.

[dbapig]

Starting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.

“No taxation without representation”

With this new ruling here’s the new chant.

“Real Representation only with $$$$$”

Awesome, it’s getting better and better.

[dbapig]

Starting in 1750, whites in the 13 colonies chose to separate from UK with this chant.

“No taxation without representation”

With this new ruling here’s the new chant.

“Real Representation only with $$$$$”

Awesome, it’s getting better and better.

[briansd1]

[quote=dbapig]
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.[/quote]

I’m surprised that conservatives who are so afraid of the United Nations, world government and black helicopters aren’t up in arms over this.

[briansd1]

[quote=dbapig]
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.[/quote]

I’m surprised that conservatives who are so afraid of the United Nations, world government and black helicopters aren’t up in arms over this.

[briansd1]

[quote=dbapig]
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.[/quote]

I’m surprised that conservatives who are so afraid of the United Nations, world government and black helicopters aren’t up in arms over this.

[briansd1]

[quote=dbapig]
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.[/quote]

I’m surprised that conservatives who are so afraid of the United Nations, world government and black helicopters aren’t up in arms over this.

[briansd1]

[quote=dbapig]
I’m not a lawyer but with this, a foreign govt can set up a corporation in USA and support a specific candidate. Not that it will happen openly (although it happens secretly now), now there is no legal argument that can make that illegal.[/quote]

I’m surprised that conservatives who are so afraid of the United Nations, world government and black helicopters aren’t up in arms over this.

[Arraya]

Lewis Black said it best a few years ago. He said that it used to be that the government and the corporations were screwing each other, but they kept it out of sight, like hotel sex. You knew somebody was screwing, but you didn’t know where.

Now, they do right out in the open like two dogs that are permanently attached to one another

[Arraya]

Lewis Black said it best a few years ago. He said that it used to be that the government and the corporations were screwing each other, but they kept it out of sight, like hotel sex. You knew somebody was screwing, but you didn’t know where.

Now, they do right out in the open like two dogs that are permanently attached to one another

[Arraya]

Lewis Black said it best a few years ago. He said that it used to be that the government and the corporations were screwing each other, but they kept it out of sight, like hotel sex. You knew somebody was screwing, but you didn’t know where.

Now, they do right out in the open like two dogs that are permanently attached to one another

[Arraya]

Lewis Black said it best a few years ago. He said that it used to be that the government and the corporations were screwing each other, but they kept it out of sight, like hotel sex. You knew somebody was screwing, but you didn’t know where.

Now, they do right out in the open like two dogs that are permanently attached to one another

[Author]

Posts