Home › Forums › Housing › Fed empties the Armory, expends all ammo, housing has bottomed. SD RE will cost more in August of 09 than it does now.
- This topic has 470 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 16, 2008 at 6:50 PM #316924December 16, 2008 at 6:54 PM #316446The OC ScamParticipant
[quote=XBoxBoy][quote=OC Scam]But seriously what makes you think the Treasury will not default on those bonds at some point soon? Maybe you think the AMERO will save us?[/quote]
I’m not sure how someone who owns the printing press defaults on bonds denominated in dollars. The fed, can always add more dollars to their ledger and then spend them buying treasuries, which gives the treasury dept money to spend. I fail to see why or how they would default as long as they continued to do that. That’s the beauty of a fiat currency. Those who control the printing presses can make as much of it as they want.
If by default, you mean to imply that at some point in time the fed will not be able to get anyone to take the dollars they drop out of the helicopter, then I suppose you could call that a default. But I don’t see that happening anytime soon. China and lots of other foreigners are still buying up dollars to manipulate their currencies, and I don’t think that game ends anytime soon.
Or maybe you mean by default that at some point deflation will cease to be a concern, and inflation will come back, and then the fed will have to face the music. I could easily see that happening, but just not any time soon.
If by default, you mean the traditional definition, ie. the treasury simply refuses to pay back the bonds they have issued, I don’t see why they would do that. Care to explain what they would gain by doing that?
XBoxBoy
[/quote]I was concerned before about the treasury being able to sell bonds to the already over sold world. But I am more concerned as of late, referring to the debate concerning treasury bonds defaulting and legitimacy of UStreasury bonds. I have recently been reading about the failures to deliver UStreasurys to be a precursor to a actual default and that maybe we are seeing a redux of counterfeit issuance of USTBonds in order to satisfy unprecedented demand.
Could the failures to deliver USTreasurys, as shown in the alarming graphic below, be a precursor to actual default?
[img_assist|nid=9825|title=US treasury settlement failure|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=50]
December 16, 2008 at 6:54 PM #316797The OC ScamParticipant[quote=XBoxBoy][quote=OC Scam]But seriously what makes you think the Treasury will not default on those bonds at some point soon? Maybe you think the AMERO will save us?[/quote]
I’m not sure how someone who owns the printing press defaults on bonds denominated in dollars. The fed, can always add more dollars to their ledger and then spend them buying treasuries, which gives the treasury dept money to spend. I fail to see why or how they would default as long as they continued to do that. That’s the beauty of a fiat currency. Those who control the printing presses can make as much of it as they want.
If by default, you mean to imply that at some point in time the fed will not be able to get anyone to take the dollars they drop out of the helicopter, then I suppose you could call that a default. But I don’t see that happening anytime soon. China and lots of other foreigners are still buying up dollars to manipulate their currencies, and I don’t think that game ends anytime soon.
Or maybe you mean by default that at some point deflation will cease to be a concern, and inflation will come back, and then the fed will have to face the music. I could easily see that happening, but just not any time soon.
If by default, you mean the traditional definition, ie. the treasury simply refuses to pay back the bonds they have issued, I don’t see why they would do that. Care to explain what they would gain by doing that?
XBoxBoy
[/quote]I was concerned before about the treasury being able to sell bonds to the already over sold world. But I am more concerned as of late, referring to the debate concerning treasury bonds defaulting and legitimacy of UStreasury bonds. I have recently been reading about the failures to deliver UStreasurys to be a precursor to a actual default and that maybe we are seeing a redux of counterfeit issuance of USTBonds in order to satisfy unprecedented demand.
Could the failures to deliver USTreasurys, as shown in the alarming graphic below, be a precursor to actual default?
[img_assist|nid=9825|title=US treasury settlement failure|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=50]
December 16, 2008 at 6:54 PM #316839The OC ScamParticipant[quote=XBoxBoy][quote=OC Scam]But seriously what makes you think the Treasury will not default on those bonds at some point soon? Maybe you think the AMERO will save us?[/quote]
I’m not sure how someone who owns the printing press defaults on bonds denominated in dollars. The fed, can always add more dollars to their ledger and then spend them buying treasuries, which gives the treasury dept money to spend. I fail to see why or how they would default as long as they continued to do that. That’s the beauty of a fiat currency. Those who control the printing presses can make as much of it as they want.
If by default, you mean to imply that at some point in time the fed will not be able to get anyone to take the dollars they drop out of the helicopter, then I suppose you could call that a default. But I don’t see that happening anytime soon. China and lots of other foreigners are still buying up dollars to manipulate their currencies, and I don’t think that game ends anytime soon.
Or maybe you mean by default that at some point deflation will cease to be a concern, and inflation will come back, and then the fed will have to face the music. I could easily see that happening, but just not any time soon.
If by default, you mean the traditional definition, ie. the treasury simply refuses to pay back the bonds they have issued, I don’t see why they would do that. Care to explain what they would gain by doing that?
XBoxBoy
[/quote]I was concerned before about the treasury being able to sell bonds to the already over sold world. But I am more concerned as of late, referring to the debate concerning treasury bonds defaulting and legitimacy of UStreasury bonds. I have recently been reading about the failures to deliver UStreasurys to be a precursor to a actual default and that maybe we are seeing a redux of counterfeit issuance of USTBonds in order to satisfy unprecedented demand.
Could the failures to deliver USTreasurys, as shown in the alarming graphic below, be a precursor to actual default?
[img_assist|nid=9825|title=US treasury settlement failure|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=50]
December 16, 2008 at 6:54 PM #316860The OC ScamParticipant[quote=XBoxBoy][quote=OC Scam]But seriously what makes you think the Treasury will not default on those bonds at some point soon? Maybe you think the AMERO will save us?[/quote]
I’m not sure how someone who owns the printing press defaults on bonds denominated in dollars. The fed, can always add more dollars to their ledger and then spend them buying treasuries, which gives the treasury dept money to spend. I fail to see why or how they would default as long as they continued to do that. That’s the beauty of a fiat currency. Those who control the printing presses can make as much of it as they want.
If by default, you mean to imply that at some point in time the fed will not be able to get anyone to take the dollars they drop out of the helicopter, then I suppose you could call that a default. But I don’t see that happening anytime soon. China and lots of other foreigners are still buying up dollars to manipulate their currencies, and I don’t think that game ends anytime soon.
Or maybe you mean by default that at some point deflation will cease to be a concern, and inflation will come back, and then the fed will have to face the music. I could easily see that happening, but just not any time soon.
If by default, you mean the traditional definition, ie. the treasury simply refuses to pay back the bonds they have issued, I don’t see why they would do that. Care to explain what they would gain by doing that?
XBoxBoy
[/quote]I was concerned before about the treasury being able to sell bonds to the already over sold world. But I am more concerned as of late, referring to the debate concerning treasury bonds defaulting and legitimacy of UStreasury bonds. I have recently been reading about the failures to deliver UStreasurys to be a precursor to a actual default and that maybe we are seeing a redux of counterfeit issuance of USTBonds in order to satisfy unprecedented demand.
Could the failures to deliver USTreasurys, as shown in the alarming graphic below, be a precursor to actual default?
[img_assist|nid=9825|title=US treasury settlement failure|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=50]
December 16, 2008 at 6:54 PM #316933The OC ScamParticipant[quote=XBoxBoy][quote=OC Scam]But seriously what makes you think the Treasury will not default on those bonds at some point soon? Maybe you think the AMERO will save us?[/quote]
I’m not sure how someone who owns the printing press defaults on bonds denominated in dollars. The fed, can always add more dollars to their ledger and then spend them buying treasuries, which gives the treasury dept money to spend. I fail to see why or how they would default as long as they continued to do that. That’s the beauty of a fiat currency. Those who control the printing presses can make as much of it as they want.
If by default, you mean to imply that at some point in time the fed will not be able to get anyone to take the dollars they drop out of the helicopter, then I suppose you could call that a default. But I don’t see that happening anytime soon. China and lots of other foreigners are still buying up dollars to manipulate their currencies, and I don’t think that game ends anytime soon.
Or maybe you mean by default that at some point deflation will cease to be a concern, and inflation will come back, and then the fed will have to face the music. I could easily see that happening, but just not any time soon.
If by default, you mean the traditional definition, ie. the treasury simply refuses to pay back the bonds they have issued, I don’t see why they would do that. Care to explain what they would gain by doing that?
XBoxBoy
[/quote]I was concerned before about the treasury being able to sell bonds to the already over sold world. But I am more concerned as of late, referring to the debate concerning treasury bonds defaulting and legitimacy of UStreasury bonds. I have recently been reading about the failures to deliver UStreasurys to be a precursor to a actual default and that maybe we are seeing a redux of counterfeit issuance of USTBonds in order to satisfy unprecedented demand.
Could the failures to deliver USTreasurys, as shown in the alarming graphic below, be a precursor to actual default?
[img_assist|nid=9825|title=US treasury settlement failure|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=50]
December 16, 2008 at 7:00 PM #316451Running BearParticipantSchizo,
You are the one that doesn’t understand it. What is the difference between 20% more decline in housing prices or 20% drop in housing value because you devalue the currency. The end result is still the same. The problem with this strategy is it makes everything we have to import more expensive.
Do you think wages are going to go up in this environment?
I don’t know about you but I have the ability to hold any currency I want and physical gold in the bank I am in. So I can easily protect my wealth from a falling dollar.
The course we are on is not a good one and time will tell whether you are as excited about this choice several years from now.
December 16, 2008 at 7:00 PM #316802Running BearParticipantSchizo,
You are the one that doesn’t understand it. What is the difference between 20% more decline in housing prices or 20% drop in housing value because you devalue the currency. The end result is still the same. The problem with this strategy is it makes everything we have to import more expensive.
Do you think wages are going to go up in this environment?
I don’t know about you but I have the ability to hold any currency I want and physical gold in the bank I am in. So I can easily protect my wealth from a falling dollar.
The course we are on is not a good one and time will tell whether you are as excited about this choice several years from now.
December 16, 2008 at 7:00 PM #316845Running BearParticipantSchizo,
You are the one that doesn’t understand it. What is the difference between 20% more decline in housing prices or 20% drop in housing value because you devalue the currency. The end result is still the same. The problem with this strategy is it makes everything we have to import more expensive.
Do you think wages are going to go up in this environment?
I don’t know about you but I have the ability to hold any currency I want and physical gold in the bank I am in. So I can easily protect my wealth from a falling dollar.
The course we are on is not a good one and time will tell whether you are as excited about this choice several years from now.
December 16, 2008 at 7:00 PM #316865Running BearParticipantSchizo,
You are the one that doesn’t understand it. What is the difference between 20% more decline in housing prices or 20% drop in housing value because you devalue the currency. The end result is still the same. The problem with this strategy is it makes everything we have to import more expensive.
Do you think wages are going to go up in this environment?
I don’t know about you but I have the ability to hold any currency I want and physical gold in the bank I am in. So I can easily protect my wealth from a falling dollar.
The course we are on is not a good one and time will tell whether you are as excited about this choice several years from now.
December 16, 2008 at 7:00 PM #316938Running BearParticipantSchizo,
You are the one that doesn’t understand it. What is the difference between 20% more decline in housing prices or 20% drop in housing value because you devalue the currency. The end result is still the same. The problem with this strategy is it makes everything we have to import more expensive.
Do you think wages are going to go up in this environment?
I don’t know about you but I have the ability to hold any currency I want and physical gold in the bank I am in. So I can easily protect my wealth from a falling dollar.
The course we are on is not a good one and time will tell whether you are as excited about this choice several years from now.
December 16, 2008 at 7:17 PM #316456The OC ScamParticipant[quote=CONCHO]Explain to me how unemployed people will:
A. Pay rent.
B. Pay mortgages.
C. Get loans.
D. Buy houses.
Silly kewp, once home prices start going up again then everyone will be working full-time as a house flipper/real estate speculator! They can just buy homes using NINJA 120% loans and live off of MEW while waiting for the proceeds from their first flip to come in. Haven’t you learned anything from the past 8 years?[/quote]
Oh God I hope your right!! If not I’m going to start buying ITEX money (www.itex.com to learn more)
December 16, 2008 at 7:17 PM #316807The OC ScamParticipant[quote=CONCHO]Explain to me how unemployed people will:
A. Pay rent.
B. Pay mortgages.
C. Get loans.
D. Buy houses.
Silly kewp, once home prices start going up again then everyone will be working full-time as a house flipper/real estate speculator! They can just buy homes using NINJA 120% loans and live off of MEW while waiting for the proceeds from their first flip to come in. Haven’t you learned anything from the past 8 years?[/quote]
Oh God I hope your right!! If not I’m going to start buying ITEX money (www.itex.com to learn more)
December 16, 2008 at 7:17 PM #316849The OC ScamParticipant[quote=CONCHO]Explain to me how unemployed people will:
A. Pay rent.
B. Pay mortgages.
C. Get loans.
D. Buy houses.
Silly kewp, once home prices start going up again then everyone will be working full-time as a house flipper/real estate speculator! They can just buy homes using NINJA 120% loans and live off of MEW while waiting for the proceeds from their first flip to come in. Haven’t you learned anything from the past 8 years?[/quote]
Oh God I hope your right!! If not I’m going to start buying ITEX money (www.itex.com to learn more)
December 16, 2008 at 7:17 PM #316870The OC ScamParticipant[quote=CONCHO]Explain to me how unemployed people will:
A. Pay rent.
B. Pay mortgages.
C. Get loans.
D. Buy houses.
Silly kewp, once home prices start going up again then everyone will be working full-time as a house flipper/real estate speculator! They can just buy homes using NINJA 120% loans and live off of MEW while waiting for the proceeds from their first flip to come in. Haven’t you learned anything from the past 8 years?[/quote]
Oh God I hope your right!! If not I’m going to start buying ITEX money (www.itex.com to learn more)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.