Home › Forums › Housing › Fed empties the Armory, expends all ammo, housing has bottomed. SD RE will cost more in August of 09 than it does now.
- This topic has 470 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 18, 2008 at 10:27 PM #318225December 19, 2008 at 12:22 PM #318037Mark HolmesParticipant
However they figured the statistics in my linked SignOnSanDiego article – I think both. You’re on. But I’m betting you are hoping I win.
December 19, 2008 at 12:22 PM #318386Mark HolmesParticipantHowever they figured the statistics in my linked SignOnSanDiego article – I think both. You’re on. But I’m betting you are hoping I win.
December 19, 2008 at 12:22 PM #318428Mark HolmesParticipantHowever they figured the statistics in my linked SignOnSanDiego article – I think both. You’re on. But I’m betting you are hoping I win.
December 19, 2008 at 12:22 PM #318448Mark HolmesParticipantHowever they figured the statistics in my linked SignOnSanDiego article – I think both. You’re on. But I’m betting you are hoping I win.
December 19, 2008 at 12:22 PM #318527Mark HolmesParticipantHowever they figured the statistics in my linked SignOnSanDiego article – I think both. You’re on. But I’m betting you are hoping I win.
December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM #318087danthedartParticipantNet operating income on rentals nationwide usually come in at 55% of gross.
55% of $2000 is only $1100.
Considering higher interest rates on investment properties and higher downpayment requirements, it might not be such a great investment.
December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM #318435danthedartParticipantNet operating income on rentals nationwide usually come in at 55% of gross.
55% of $2000 is only $1100.
Considering higher interest rates on investment properties and higher downpayment requirements, it might not be such a great investment.
December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM #318478danthedartParticipantNet operating income on rentals nationwide usually come in at 55% of gross.
55% of $2000 is only $1100.
Considering higher interest rates on investment properties and higher downpayment requirements, it might not be such a great investment.
December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM #318499danthedartParticipantNet operating income on rentals nationwide usually come in at 55% of gross.
55% of $2000 is only $1100.
Considering higher interest rates on investment properties and higher downpayment requirements, it might not be such a great investment.
December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM #318577danthedartParticipantNet operating income on rentals nationwide usually come in at 55% of gross.
55% of $2000 is only $1100.
Considering higher interest rates on investment properties and higher downpayment requirements, it might not be such a great investment.
December 19, 2008 at 2:43 PM #318107sdduuuudeParticipantNaw. Not really. I have a house and hope to buy a different one in about 5 years. The median has gotten killed. Another 25% would really be bad news. I’m more concerned w/ staying employed than housing prices at this point.
Plus, I’m relying on a statistical anomaly to win. I think price reductions at the low end are just about done, and suspect the future damage will be done in properties above the median which will have little affect on the median at all.
Note how in the early days of the crash, the low end was getting killed. In fact, it bumped up as low-end sales reduced. We all saw it, but the median barely moved. Then, as it hit middle ground, the median collapsed. As it moves past the median, I suspect the movement of the median will slow dramatically even as some neighborhoods get creamed. Sales reductions on the high end, though, will push it down a bit.
Not sure I’d take the “under 25%” position if it were Case-Schiller. Maybe I would. Yeah. I think I would.
So the magic number is 228,750.
Can anyone clarify what median measure was $305K in Nov ? Was it all sales or resales ?
December 19, 2008 at 2:43 PM #318455sdduuuudeParticipantNaw. Not really. I have a house and hope to buy a different one in about 5 years. The median has gotten killed. Another 25% would really be bad news. I’m more concerned w/ staying employed than housing prices at this point.
Plus, I’m relying on a statistical anomaly to win. I think price reductions at the low end are just about done, and suspect the future damage will be done in properties above the median which will have little affect on the median at all.
Note how in the early days of the crash, the low end was getting killed. In fact, it bumped up as low-end sales reduced. We all saw it, but the median barely moved. Then, as it hit middle ground, the median collapsed. As it moves past the median, I suspect the movement of the median will slow dramatically even as some neighborhoods get creamed. Sales reductions on the high end, though, will push it down a bit.
Not sure I’d take the “under 25%” position if it were Case-Schiller. Maybe I would. Yeah. I think I would.
So the magic number is 228,750.
Can anyone clarify what median measure was $305K in Nov ? Was it all sales or resales ?
December 19, 2008 at 2:43 PM #318498sdduuuudeParticipantNaw. Not really. I have a house and hope to buy a different one in about 5 years. The median has gotten killed. Another 25% would really be bad news. I’m more concerned w/ staying employed than housing prices at this point.
Plus, I’m relying on a statistical anomaly to win. I think price reductions at the low end are just about done, and suspect the future damage will be done in properties above the median which will have little affect on the median at all.
Note how in the early days of the crash, the low end was getting killed. In fact, it bumped up as low-end sales reduced. We all saw it, but the median barely moved. Then, as it hit middle ground, the median collapsed. As it moves past the median, I suspect the movement of the median will slow dramatically even as some neighborhoods get creamed. Sales reductions on the high end, though, will push it down a bit.
Not sure I’d take the “under 25%” position if it were Case-Schiller. Maybe I would. Yeah. I think I would.
So the magic number is 228,750.
Can anyone clarify what median measure was $305K in Nov ? Was it all sales or resales ?
December 19, 2008 at 2:43 PM #318518sdduuuudeParticipantNaw. Not really. I have a house and hope to buy a different one in about 5 years. The median has gotten killed. Another 25% would really be bad news. I’m more concerned w/ staying employed than housing prices at this point.
Plus, I’m relying on a statistical anomaly to win. I think price reductions at the low end are just about done, and suspect the future damage will be done in properties above the median which will have little affect on the median at all.
Note how in the early days of the crash, the low end was getting killed. In fact, it bumped up as low-end sales reduced. We all saw it, but the median barely moved. Then, as it hit middle ground, the median collapsed. As it moves past the median, I suspect the movement of the median will slow dramatically even as some neighborhoods get creamed. Sales reductions on the high end, though, will push it down a bit.
Not sure I’d take the “under 25%” position if it were Case-Schiller. Maybe I would. Yeah. I think I would.
So the magic number is 228,750.
Can anyone clarify what median measure was $305K in Nov ? Was it all sales or resales ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.