- This topic has 275 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by dbapig.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 28, 2008 at 6:17 PM #230571June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM #230393bsrsharmaParticipant
A little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM #230515bsrsharmaParticipantA little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM #230525bsrsharmaParticipantA little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM #230560bsrsharmaParticipantA little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM #230575bsrsharmaParticipantA little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
June 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM #230403afx114Participant[quote=jficquette]Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.[/quote]
Typical nutjob, missing the entire point of my post. I was pointing out the absurdity of both claims and the fact that they are both proven bunk if you do your own research rather than relying on a few paragraphs written by a few “journalists”. The Internets(tm) are big enough and The Googles(tm) are powerful enough that anyone can find any “evidence” to support any position.
June 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM #230526afx114Participant[quote=jficquette]Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.[/quote]
Typical nutjob, missing the entire point of my post. I was pointing out the absurdity of both claims and the fact that they are both proven bunk if you do your own research rather than relying on a few paragraphs written by a few “journalists”. The Internets(tm) are big enough and The Googles(tm) are powerful enough that anyone can find any “evidence” to support any position.
June 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM #230535afx114Participant[quote=jficquette]Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.[/quote]
Typical nutjob, missing the entire point of my post. I was pointing out the absurdity of both claims and the fact that they are both proven bunk if you do your own research rather than relying on a few paragraphs written by a few “journalists”. The Internets(tm) are big enough and The Googles(tm) are powerful enough that anyone can find any “evidence” to support any position.
June 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM #230570afx114Participant[quote=jficquette]Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.[/quote]
Typical nutjob, missing the entire point of my post. I was pointing out the absurdity of both claims and the fact that they are both proven bunk if you do your own research rather than relying on a few paragraphs written by a few “journalists”. The Internets(tm) are big enough and The Googles(tm) are powerful enough that anyone can find any “evidence” to support any position.
June 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM #230586afx114Participant[quote=jficquette]Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.[/quote]
Typical nutjob, missing the entire point of my post. I was pointing out the absurdity of both claims and the fact that they are both proven bunk if you do your own research rather than relying on a few paragraphs written by a few “journalists”. The Internets(tm) are big enough and The Googles(tm) are powerful enough that anyone can find any “evidence” to support any position.
June 28, 2008 at 7:27 PM #230408afx114Participant[quote=gandalf]This jfiq guy has been posting for a couple of months now. Not much about real estate, mostly partisan political garbage like this. I think he’s some sort of political party operative, infiltrating the Piggs… One of those college republican types too, no time in the service but attacks dems for being weak on defense and not wearing flag pins and such.[/quote]
He’s a 4-star General in the 101st Fighting Keyboarders. He’s probably getting “points” on MyMcCain.com for every BS thread he starts all over The Internets(tm).
June 28, 2008 at 7:27 PM #230531afx114Participant[quote=gandalf]This jfiq guy has been posting for a couple of months now. Not much about real estate, mostly partisan political garbage like this. I think he’s some sort of political party operative, infiltrating the Piggs… One of those college republican types too, no time in the service but attacks dems for being weak on defense and not wearing flag pins and such.[/quote]
He’s a 4-star General in the 101st Fighting Keyboarders. He’s probably getting “points” on MyMcCain.com for every BS thread he starts all over The Internets(tm).
June 28, 2008 at 7:27 PM #230541afx114Participant[quote=gandalf]This jfiq guy has been posting for a couple of months now. Not much about real estate, mostly partisan political garbage like this. I think he’s some sort of political party operative, infiltrating the Piggs… One of those college republican types too, no time in the service but attacks dems for being weak on defense and not wearing flag pins and such.[/quote]
He’s a 4-star General in the 101st Fighting Keyboarders. He’s probably getting “points” on MyMcCain.com for every BS thread he starts all over The Internets(tm).
June 28, 2008 at 7:27 PM #230576afx114Participant[quote=gandalf]This jfiq guy has been posting for a couple of months now. Not much about real estate, mostly partisan political garbage like this. I think he’s some sort of political party operative, infiltrating the Piggs… One of those college republican types too, no time in the service but attacks dems for being weak on defense and not wearing flag pins and such.[/quote]
He’s a 4-star General in the 101st Fighting Keyboarders. He’s probably getting “points” on MyMcCain.com for every BS thread he starts all over The Internets(tm).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.