- This topic has 275 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by dbapig.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 28, 2008 at 3:37 PM #230430June 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM #230238NotCrankyParticipant
John, did you know that if you write Obama backwards it spells Amabo?
June 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM #230360NotCrankyParticipantJohn, did you know that if you write Obama backwards it spells Amabo?
June 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM #230367NotCrankyParticipantJohn, did you know that if you write Obama backwards it spells Amabo?
June 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM #230404NotCrankyParticipantJohn, did you know that if you write Obama backwards it spells Amabo?
June 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM #230421NotCrankyParticipantJohn, did you know that if you write Obama backwards it spells Amabo?
June 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM #230276jficquetteParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to play that ridiculous card, let me show you my hand:
“McCain’s citizenship called into question
Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as ‘natural born'”http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23415028/
Really.. is that all we have on these guys? Their ‘OMG PHOTOSHOP’ birth certificates? Give me a break. Both of these claims are ridiculous and grasping at straws. Stop with the tabloid BS and lets talk issues.[/quote]
Here is a passage from your article.
“Sen. McCain is undoubtedly a citizen. He was born on Aug. 29, 1936, in the Panama Canal Zone, and Congress has specifically provided that anyone born there of U.S. parents, as he was, is a citizen. Indeed, the general rule is that anyone born of U.S. parents outside the United States is a citizen.”
Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.
I doubt if you even read anything in the article I posted.
June 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM #230396jficquetteParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to play that ridiculous card, let me show you my hand:
“McCain’s citizenship called into question
Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as ‘natural born'”http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23415028/
Really.. is that all we have on these guys? Their ‘OMG PHOTOSHOP’ birth certificates? Give me a break. Both of these claims are ridiculous and grasping at straws. Stop with the tabloid BS and lets talk issues.[/quote]
Here is a passage from your article.
“Sen. McCain is undoubtedly a citizen. He was born on Aug. 29, 1936, in the Panama Canal Zone, and Congress has specifically provided that anyone born there of U.S. parents, as he was, is a citizen. Indeed, the general rule is that anyone born of U.S. parents outside the United States is a citizen.”
Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.
I doubt if you even read anything in the article I posted.
June 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM #230402jficquetteParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to play that ridiculous card, let me show you my hand:
“McCain’s citizenship called into question
Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as ‘natural born'”http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23415028/
Really.. is that all we have on these guys? Their ‘OMG PHOTOSHOP’ birth certificates? Give me a break. Both of these claims are ridiculous and grasping at straws. Stop with the tabloid BS and lets talk issues.[/quote]
Here is a passage from your article.
“Sen. McCain is undoubtedly a citizen. He was born on Aug. 29, 1936, in the Panama Canal Zone, and Congress has specifically provided that anyone born there of U.S. parents, as he was, is a citizen. Indeed, the general rule is that anyone born of U.S. parents outside the United States is a citizen.”
Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.
I doubt if you even read anything in the article I posted.
June 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM #230441jficquetteParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to play that ridiculous card, let me show you my hand:
“McCain’s citizenship called into question
Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as ‘natural born'”http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23415028/
Really.. is that all we have on these guys? Their ‘OMG PHOTOSHOP’ birth certificates? Give me a break. Both of these claims are ridiculous and grasping at straws. Stop with the tabloid BS and lets talk issues.[/quote]
Here is a passage from your article.
“Sen. McCain is undoubtedly a citizen. He was born on Aug. 29, 1936, in the Panama Canal Zone, and Congress has specifically provided that anyone born there of U.S. parents, as he was, is a citizen. Indeed, the general rule is that anyone born of U.S. parents outside the United States is a citizen.”
Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.
I doubt if you even read anything in the article I posted.
June 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM #230455jficquetteParticipant[quote=afx114]If you’re going to play that ridiculous card, let me show you my hand:
“McCain’s citizenship called into question
Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as ‘natural born'”http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23415028/
Really.. is that all we have on these guys? Their ‘OMG PHOTOSHOP’ birth certificates? Give me a break. Both of these claims are ridiculous and grasping at straws. Stop with the tabloid BS and lets talk issues.[/quote]
Here is a passage from your article.
“Sen. McCain is undoubtedly a citizen. He was born on Aug. 29, 1936, in the Panama Canal Zone, and Congress has specifically provided that anyone born there of U.S. parents, as he was, is a citizen. Indeed, the general rule is that anyone born of U.S. parents outside the United States is a citizen.”
Typical Lib, just post the part you want other to see and ignore the rest even when it contradicts the info posted.
I doubt if you even read anything in the article I posted.
June 28, 2008 at 4:25 PM #230271jficquetteParticipant[quote=LA_Renter]The National Review online (a very conservative publication) pretty much poo poohs this.
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTIzMDE2OTJiOTkwNmE3MTQwOWZiODYyZTBiMzdhMmI=
“I spoke to Ms. Okubo late Wednesday afternoon, and she said she had seen the version of Obama’s certificate of live birth posted on the sites. While her office cannot verify the information on a form without the permission of the certificate holder (Obama), she said “the form is exactly the same” and it has “all the components of a birth certificate” record issued by the state. In other words, she sees no reason to think the version posted on Obama’s web site and Daily Kos is not genuine.
The “embossed seal” in question is, she said, probably on the back of the document provided to Daily Kos, but not visible (as in another certificate posted on Israel Insider for contrast). She thinks the difference in visibility can be attributed to the pressure used when applying the seal.
I know I was one of the guys who wondered if there was something there when Obama initially refused to provide his birth certificate to PolitiFact. It seems many people continue to think that they will uncover something that will prove Obama was born in Kenya and is therefore ineligible for office of the presidency. As I wrote in the initial post, this scenario is “rather unlikely, as it would require everyone in his family to lie about this in every interview and discussion with those outside the family since young Obama appeared on the scene.” I would add this would require Obama to lie about his birthplace in every interview going back to Harvard Law.”[/quote]
That information is the same as I linked. I don’t see your point.
The point is Hawaii can’t verify the one online as authentic and Obama refuses to release the orginial. What his he hiding??
Here is an interesting exchange between Russert and Obama.
MR. RUSSERT: You talked about Senator Clinton having records released from the Clinton Library regarding her experience as first lady, and yet when you were asked about, “What about eight years in the state senate of Illinois,” you said, “I don’t know.” Where, where are the—where are your records?
SEN. OBAMA: Tim, we did not keep those records. I…
MR. RUSSERT: Are they gone?
SEN. OBAMA: Well, let’s be clear. In the state senate, every single piece of information, every document related to state government was kept by the state of Illinois and has been disclosed and is available and has been gone through with a fine-toothed comb by news outlets in Illinois.* The, the stuff that I did not keep has to do with, for example, my schedule. I didn’t have a schedule. I was a state senator. I wasn’t intending to have the Barack Obama State Senate Library. I didn’t have 50 or 500 people to, to help me archive these issues. So…
MR. RUSSERT: But your meetings with lobbyists and so forth, there’s no record of that?
SEN. OBAMA: I did not have a scheduler, but, as I said, every document related to my interactions with government is available right now. And, as I said, news outlets have already looked at them.
MR. RUSSERT: Is your schedule available anywhere? Are—the records exist?
SEN. OBAMA: I—Tim, I kept my own schedule. I didn’t have a scheduler.
Obama doesn’t have any records of his activites??? What a joke and an obvious lie. I guess when one keeps the company of terriosts, criminals and racists posing as Preachers then one needs to do hide it if they want to be president.
June 28, 2008 at 4:25 PM #230391jficquetteParticipant[quote=LA_Renter]The National Review online (a very conservative publication) pretty much poo poohs this.
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTIzMDE2OTJiOTkwNmE3MTQwOWZiODYyZTBiMzdhMmI=
“I spoke to Ms. Okubo late Wednesday afternoon, and she said she had seen the version of Obama’s certificate of live birth posted on the sites. While her office cannot verify the information on a form without the permission of the certificate holder (Obama), she said “the form is exactly the same” and it has “all the components of a birth certificate” record issued by the state. In other words, she sees no reason to think the version posted on Obama’s web site and Daily Kos is not genuine.
The “embossed seal” in question is, she said, probably on the back of the document provided to Daily Kos, but not visible (as in another certificate posted on Israel Insider for contrast). She thinks the difference in visibility can be attributed to the pressure used when applying the seal.
I know I was one of the guys who wondered if there was something there when Obama initially refused to provide his birth certificate to PolitiFact. It seems many people continue to think that they will uncover something that will prove Obama was born in Kenya and is therefore ineligible for office of the presidency. As I wrote in the initial post, this scenario is “rather unlikely, as it would require everyone in his family to lie about this in every interview and discussion with those outside the family since young Obama appeared on the scene.” I would add this would require Obama to lie about his birthplace in every interview going back to Harvard Law.”[/quote]
That information is the same as I linked. I don’t see your point.
The point is Hawaii can’t verify the one online as authentic and Obama refuses to release the orginial. What his he hiding??
Here is an interesting exchange between Russert and Obama.
MR. RUSSERT: You talked about Senator Clinton having records released from the Clinton Library regarding her experience as first lady, and yet when you were asked about, “What about eight years in the state senate of Illinois,” you said, “I don’t know.” Where, where are the—where are your records?
SEN. OBAMA: Tim, we did not keep those records. I…
MR. RUSSERT: Are they gone?
SEN. OBAMA: Well, let’s be clear. In the state senate, every single piece of information, every document related to state government was kept by the state of Illinois and has been disclosed and is available and has been gone through with a fine-toothed comb by news outlets in Illinois.* The, the stuff that I did not keep has to do with, for example, my schedule. I didn’t have a schedule. I was a state senator. I wasn’t intending to have the Barack Obama State Senate Library. I didn’t have 50 or 500 people to, to help me archive these issues. So…
MR. RUSSERT: But your meetings with lobbyists and so forth, there’s no record of that?
SEN. OBAMA: I did not have a scheduler, but, as I said, every document related to my interactions with government is available right now. And, as I said, news outlets have already looked at them.
MR. RUSSERT: Is your schedule available anywhere? Are—the records exist?
SEN. OBAMA: I—Tim, I kept my own schedule. I didn’t have a scheduler.
Obama doesn’t have any records of his activites??? What a joke and an obvious lie. I guess when one keeps the company of terriosts, criminals and racists posing as Preachers then one needs to do hide it if they want to be president.
June 28, 2008 at 4:25 PM #230397jficquetteParticipant[quote=LA_Renter]The National Review online (a very conservative publication) pretty much poo poohs this.
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTIzMDE2OTJiOTkwNmE3MTQwOWZiODYyZTBiMzdhMmI=
“I spoke to Ms. Okubo late Wednesday afternoon, and she said she had seen the version of Obama’s certificate of live birth posted on the sites. While her office cannot verify the information on a form without the permission of the certificate holder (Obama), she said “the form is exactly the same” and it has “all the components of a birth certificate” record issued by the state. In other words, she sees no reason to think the version posted on Obama’s web site and Daily Kos is not genuine.
The “embossed seal” in question is, she said, probably on the back of the document provided to Daily Kos, but not visible (as in another certificate posted on Israel Insider for contrast). She thinks the difference in visibility can be attributed to the pressure used when applying the seal.
I know I was one of the guys who wondered if there was something there when Obama initially refused to provide his birth certificate to PolitiFact. It seems many people continue to think that they will uncover something that will prove Obama was born in Kenya and is therefore ineligible for office of the presidency. As I wrote in the initial post, this scenario is “rather unlikely, as it would require everyone in his family to lie about this in every interview and discussion with those outside the family since young Obama appeared on the scene.” I would add this would require Obama to lie about his birthplace in every interview going back to Harvard Law.”[/quote]
That information is the same as I linked. I don’t see your point.
The point is Hawaii can’t verify the one online as authentic and Obama refuses to release the orginial. What his he hiding??
Here is an interesting exchange between Russert and Obama.
MR. RUSSERT: You talked about Senator Clinton having records released from the Clinton Library regarding her experience as first lady, and yet when you were asked about, “What about eight years in the state senate of Illinois,” you said, “I don’t know.” Where, where are the—where are your records?
SEN. OBAMA: Tim, we did not keep those records. I…
MR. RUSSERT: Are they gone?
SEN. OBAMA: Well, let’s be clear. In the state senate, every single piece of information, every document related to state government was kept by the state of Illinois and has been disclosed and is available and has been gone through with a fine-toothed comb by news outlets in Illinois.* The, the stuff that I did not keep has to do with, for example, my schedule. I didn’t have a schedule. I was a state senator. I wasn’t intending to have the Barack Obama State Senate Library. I didn’t have 50 or 500 people to, to help me archive these issues. So…
MR. RUSSERT: But your meetings with lobbyists and so forth, there’s no record of that?
SEN. OBAMA: I did not have a scheduler, but, as I said, every document related to my interactions with government is available right now. And, as I said, news outlets have already looked at them.
MR. RUSSERT: Is your schedule available anywhere? Are—the records exist?
SEN. OBAMA: I—Tim, I kept my own schedule. I didn’t have a scheduler.
Obama doesn’t have any records of his activites??? What a joke and an obvious lie. I guess when one keeps the company of terriosts, criminals and racists posing as Preachers then one needs to do hide it if they want to be president.
June 28, 2008 at 4:25 PM #230436jficquetteParticipant[quote=LA_Renter]The National Review online (a very conservative publication) pretty much poo poohs this.
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTIzMDE2OTJiOTkwNmE3MTQwOWZiODYyZTBiMzdhMmI=
“I spoke to Ms. Okubo late Wednesday afternoon, and she said she had seen the version of Obama’s certificate of live birth posted on the sites. While her office cannot verify the information on a form without the permission of the certificate holder (Obama), she said “the form is exactly the same” and it has “all the components of a birth certificate” record issued by the state. In other words, she sees no reason to think the version posted on Obama’s web site and Daily Kos is not genuine.
The “embossed seal” in question is, she said, probably on the back of the document provided to Daily Kos, but not visible (as in another certificate posted on Israel Insider for contrast). She thinks the difference in visibility can be attributed to the pressure used when applying the seal.
I know I was one of the guys who wondered if there was something there when Obama initially refused to provide his birth certificate to PolitiFact. It seems many people continue to think that they will uncover something that will prove Obama was born in Kenya and is therefore ineligible for office of the presidency. As I wrote in the initial post, this scenario is “rather unlikely, as it would require everyone in his family to lie about this in every interview and discussion with those outside the family since young Obama appeared on the scene.” I would add this would require Obama to lie about his birthplace in every interview going back to Harvard Law.”[/quote]
That information is the same as I linked. I don’t see your point.
The point is Hawaii can’t verify the one online as authentic and Obama refuses to release the orginial. What his he hiding??
Here is an interesting exchange between Russert and Obama.
MR. RUSSERT: You talked about Senator Clinton having records released from the Clinton Library regarding her experience as first lady, and yet when you were asked about, “What about eight years in the state senate of Illinois,” you said, “I don’t know.” Where, where are the—where are your records?
SEN. OBAMA: Tim, we did not keep those records. I…
MR. RUSSERT: Are they gone?
SEN. OBAMA: Well, let’s be clear. In the state senate, every single piece of information, every document related to state government was kept by the state of Illinois and has been disclosed and is available and has been gone through with a fine-toothed comb by news outlets in Illinois.* The, the stuff that I did not keep has to do with, for example, my schedule. I didn’t have a schedule. I was a state senator. I wasn’t intending to have the Barack Obama State Senate Library. I didn’t have 50 or 500 people to, to help me archive these issues. So…
MR. RUSSERT: But your meetings with lobbyists and so forth, there’s no record of that?
SEN. OBAMA: I did not have a scheduler, but, as I said, every document related to my interactions with government is available right now. And, as I said, news outlets have already looked at them.
MR. RUSSERT: Is your schedule available anywhere? Are—the records exist?
SEN. OBAMA: I—Tim, I kept my own schedule. I didn’t have a scheduler.
Obama doesn’t have any records of his activites??? What a joke and an obvious lie. I guess when one keeps the company of terriosts, criminals and racists posing as Preachers then one needs to do hide it if they want to be president.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.