- This topic has 300 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 2, 2009 at 12:34 PM #392416May 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM #391789
scaredyclassic
Participantextreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. the bull seems less mean-spirited because supposedly all he wants is for everyone to become rich, to bring others into the ponzi scheme, and to enlighten others about the easy way to make money. the cheerleading bear, on the other hand, is trying to potentially profit off of others mistakes and misery, to bring down the value of the whole system, to basically make us all “poorer”. but really, the bull is just as much trying to profit off of other’s misery and mistakes.
May 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM #392052Participantextreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. the bull seems less mean-spirited because supposedly all he wants is for everyone to become rich, to bring others into the ponzi scheme, and to enlighten others about the easy way to make money. the cheerleading bear, on the other hand, is trying to potentially profit off of others mistakes and misery, to bring down the value of the whole system, to basically make us all “poorer”. but really, the bull is just as much trying to profit off of other’s misery and mistakes.
May 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM #392264Participantextreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. the bull seems less mean-spirited because supposedly all he wants is for everyone to become rich, to bring others into the ponzi scheme, and to enlighten others about the easy way to make money. the cheerleading bear, on the other hand, is trying to potentially profit off of others mistakes and misery, to bring down the value of the whole system, to basically make us all “poorer”. but really, the bull is just as much trying to profit off of other’s misery and mistakes.
May 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM #392315Participantextreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. the bull seems less mean-spirited because supposedly all he wants is for everyone to become rich, to bring others into the ponzi scheme, and to enlighten others about the easy way to make money. the cheerleading bear, on the other hand, is trying to potentially profit off of others mistakes and misery, to bring down the value of the whole system, to basically make us all “poorer”. but really, the bull is just as much trying to profit off of other’s misery and mistakes.
May 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM #392457Participantextreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. the bull seems less mean-spirited because supposedly all he wants is for everyone to become rich, to bring others into the ponzi scheme, and to enlighten others about the easy way to make money. the cheerleading bear, on the other hand, is trying to potentially profit off of others mistakes and misery, to bring down the value of the whole system, to basically make us all “poorer”. but really, the bull is just as much trying to profit off of other’s misery and mistakes.
May 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM #391811NotCranky
Participant[quote=scaredycat]extreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. [/quote]
Good point, but I think the bears have a lot more reason to be skeptical. Some of them might be misguided,or end up wrong in any case, but they can’t generally be accused of having blatant self-interest at heart. They won’t suffer much from being wrong because they will just say “I would have been right if this or that didn’t happen”.
The main problem I see possibly coming for some super bears is that they could come to find that they have deluded themselves into thinking they would be able to buy a lot more than reality allows for.
May 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM #392074Participant[quote=scaredycat]extreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. [/quote]
Good point, but I think the bears have a lot more reason to be skeptical. Some of them might be misguided,or end up wrong in any case, but they can’t generally be accused of having blatant self-interest at heart. They won’t suffer much from being wrong because they will just say “I would have been right if this or that didn’t happen”.
The main problem I see possibly coming for some super bears is that they could come to find that they have deluded themselves into thinking they would be able to buy a lot more than reality allows for.
May 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM #392284Participant[quote=scaredycat]extreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. [/quote]
Good point, but I think the bears have a lot more reason to be skeptical. Some of them might be misguided,or end up wrong in any case, but they can’t generally be accused of having blatant self-interest at heart. They won’t suffer much from being wrong because they will just say “I would have been right if this or that didn’t happen”.
The main problem I see possibly coming for some super bears is that they could come to find that they have deluded themselves into thinking they would be able to buy a lot more than reality allows for.
May 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM #392337Participant[quote=scaredycat]extreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. [/quote]
Good point, but I think the bears have a lot more reason to be skeptical. Some of them might be misguided,or end up wrong in any case, but they can’t generally be accused of having blatant self-interest at heart. They won’t suffer much from being wrong because they will just say “I would have been right if this or that didn’t happen”.
The main problem I see possibly coming for some super bears is that they could come to find that they have deluded themselves into thinking they would be able to buy a lot more than reality allows for.
May 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM #392478Participant[quote=scaredycat]extreme obnoxiousness seems to go with real estate, at least on the bullish side. i recall smugness certainty, and condescension from real estate cheerleaders, no w ay tor ationally discuss issues. it seems much more obnoxious to be an in-your-face, watch out for the next 40% chunk, real estate bear. each side is kind of irritating in its own way. [/quote]
Good point, but I think the bears have a lot more reason to be skeptical. Some of them might be misguided,or end up wrong in any case, but they can’t generally be accused of having blatant self-interest at heart. They won’t suffer much from being wrong because they will just say “I would have been right if this or that didn’t happen”.
The main problem I see possibly coming for some super bears is that they could come to find that they have deluded themselves into thinking they would be able to buy a lot more than reality allows for.
May 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM #391904Participantdoesnt sound like a very dangerous delusion; sitting on the sidelines and not being able toget as great a deal as you’d hoped but still better than before. seems like the delusion of riches is more dangerous to your wealth.
May 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM #392167Participantdoesnt sound like a very dangerous delusion; sitting on the sidelines and not being able toget as great a deal as you’d hoped but still better than before. seems like the delusion of riches is more dangerous to your wealth.
May 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM #392378Participantdoesnt sound like a very dangerous delusion; sitting on the sidelines and not being able toget as great a deal as you’d hoped but still better than before. seems like the delusion of riches is more dangerous to your wealth.
May 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM #392430Participantdoesnt sound like a very dangerous delusion; sitting on the sidelines and not being able toget as great a deal as you’d hoped but still better than before. seems like the delusion of riches is more dangerous to your wealth.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.