[temeculaguy]

Just so you don’t think Del Mar is a ghetto, you have to look at how crime stats are calculated. The number of residents is divided by the number of crimes. The number of residents is considered the full time residents (census data). Del Mar is considered to have only 2,000 residents, yet at any one time there are more than 10k people laying their heads there. Much of what people consider as Del Mar is actually in the city of San Diego and not truly Del Mar. So the Del mar and some coastal numbers are skewed. Another think to note is 4-S is considered part of poway for arjis reporting. You skipped Ramona, the lowest crime in the county for three years, under a 13.0 per thousand last year. Ramona usually wins with the lowest stats. The funny thing is that gun ownership is probably highest in Ramona where you don’t need one and in Oceanside you not only need to have one, you need to be a good shot and have lots of ammunition.

Other than those anomolies, the numbers are accurate, Oceanside and Escondido are many times more dangerous than most, Vista not far behind, then San marcos and then Carlsbad, then Poway. If you look at the officer per thousand residents numbers it is exactly the inverse. Carlsbad has the most cops per resident, followed by poway, then San marcos. Vista , Esco and Oceanside have the fewest, it’s not rocket science, less cops=more crime. All of the cities listed are small police departments or Sheriff contracts, don’t get me started on the City of San Diego. All of the city locations have far fewer cops per resident and it’s getting worse with the city’s financial problems. If it’s crime you worry about avoid San Diego City (includes La Jolla and Scripps) because it is not going to get any better, they almost went bankrupt during the biggest economic boom of the century, how are they going to cope with the bad times?

[temeculaguy]

Just so you don’t think Del Mar is a ghetto, you have to look at how crime stats are calculated. The number of residents is divided by the number of crimes. The number of residents is considered the full time residents (census data). Del Mar is considered to have only 2,000 residents, yet at any one time there are more than 10k people laying their heads there. Much of what people consider as Del Mar is actually in the city of San Diego and not truly Del Mar. So the Del mar and some coastal numbers are skewed. Another think to note is 4-S is considered part of poway for arjis reporting. You skipped Ramona, the lowest crime in the county for three years, under a 13.0 per thousand last year. Ramona usually wins with the lowest stats. The funny thing is that gun ownership is probably highest in Ramona where you don’t need one and in Oceanside you not only need to have one, you need to be a good shot and have lots of ammunition.

Other than those anomolies, the numbers are accurate, Oceanside and Escondido are many times more dangerous than most, Vista not far behind, then San marcos and then Carlsbad, then Poway. If you look at the officer per thousand residents numbers it is exactly the inverse. Carlsbad has the most cops per resident, followed by poway, then San marcos. Vista , Esco and Oceanside have the fewest, it’s not rocket science, less cops=more crime. All of the cities listed are small police departments or Sheriff contracts, don’t get me started on the City of San Diego. All of the city locations have far fewer cops per resident and it’s getting worse with the city’s financial problems. If it’s crime you worry about avoid San Diego City (includes La Jolla and Scripps) because it is not going to get any better, they almost went bankrupt during the biggest economic boom of the century, how are they going to cope with the bad times?

[temeculaguy]

Just so you don’t think Del Mar is a ghetto, you have to look at how crime stats are calculated. The number of residents is divided by the number of crimes. The number of residents is considered the full time residents (census data). Del Mar is considered to have only 2,000 residents, yet at any one time there are more than 10k people laying their heads there. Much of what people consider as Del Mar is actually in the city of San Diego and not truly Del Mar. So the Del mar and some coastal numbers are skewed. Another think to note is 4-S is considered part of poway for arjis reporting. You skipped Ramona, the lowest crime in the county for three years, under a 13.0 per thousand last year. Ramona usually wins with the lowest stats. The funny thing is that gun ownership is probably highest in Ramona where you don’t need one and in Oceanside you not only need to have one, you need to be a good shot and have lots of ammunition.

Other than those anomolies, the numbers are accurate, Oceanside and Escondido are many times more dangerous than most, Vista not far behind, then San marcos and then Carlsbad, then Poway. If you look at the officer per thousand residents numbers it is exactly the inverse. Carlsbad has the most cops per resident, followed by poway, then San marcos. Vista , Esco and Oceanside have the fewest, it’s not rocket science, less cops=more crime. All of the cities listed are small police departments or Sheriff contracts, don’t get me started on the City of San Diego. All of the city locations have far fewer cops per resident and it’s getting worse with the city’s financial problems. If it’s crime you worry about avoid San Diego City (includes La Jolla and Scripps) because it is not going to get any better, they almost went bankrupt during the biggest economic boom of the century, how are they going to cope with the bad times?

[temeculaguy]

Just so you don’t think Del Mar is a ghetto, you have to look at how crime stats are calculated. The number of residents is divided by the number of crimes. The number of residents is considered the full time residents (census data). Del Mar is considered to have only 2,000 residents, yet at any one time there are more than 10k people laying their heads there. Much of what people consider as Del Mar is actually in the city of San Diego and not truly Del Mar. So the Del mar and some coastal numbers are skewed. Another think to note is 4-S is considered part of poway for arjis reporting. You skipped Ramona, the lowest crime in the county for three years, under a 13.0 per thousand last year. Ramona usually wins with the lowest stats. The funny thing is that gun ownership is probably highest in Ramona where you don’t need one and in Oceanside you not only need to have one, you need to be a good shot and have lots of ammunition.

Other than those anomolies, the numbers are accurate, Oceanside and Escondido are many times more dangerous than most, Vista not far behind, then San marcos and then Carlsbad, then Poway. If you look at the officer per thousand residents numbers it is exactly the inverse. Carlsbad has the most cops per resident, followed by poway, then San marcos. Vista , Esco and Oceanside have the fewest, it’s not rocket science, less cops=more crime. All of the cities listed are small police departments or Sheriff contracts, don’t get me started on the City of San Diego. All of the city locations have far fewer cops per resident and it’s getting worse with the city’s financial problems. If it’s crime you worry about avoid San Diego City (includes La Jolla and Scripps) because it is not going to get any better, they almost went bankrupt during the biggest economic boom of the century, how are they going to cope with the bad times?

[temeculaguy]

Just so you don’t think Del Mar is a ghetto, you have to look at how crime stats are calculated. The number of residents is divided by the number of crimes. The number of residents is considered the full time residents (census data). Del Mar is considered to have only 2,000 residents, yet at any one time there are more than 10k people laying their heads there. Much of what people consider as Del Mar is actually in the city of San Diego and not truly Del Mar. So the Del mar and some coastal numbers are skewed. Another think to note is 4-S is considered part of poway for arjis reporting. You skipped Ramona, the lowest crime in the county for three years, under a 13.0 per thousand last year. Ramona usually wins with the lowest stats. The funny thing is that gun ownership is probably highest in Ramona where you don’t need one and in Oceanside you not only need to have one, you need to be a good shot and have lots of ammunition.

Other than those anomolies, the numbers are accurate, Oceanside and Escondido are many times more dangerous than most, Vista not far behind, then San marcos and then Carlsbad, then Poway. If you look at the officer per thousand residents numbers it is exactly the inverse. Carlsbad has the most cops per resident, followed by poway, then San marcos. Vista , Esco and Oceanside have the fewest, it’s not rocket science, less cops=more crime. All of the cities listed are small police departments or Sheriff contracts, don’t get me started on the City of San Diego. All of the city locations have far fewer cops per resident and it’s getting worse with the city’s financial problems. If it’s crime you worry about avoid San Diego City (includes La Jolla and Scripps) because it is not going to get any better, they almost went bankrupt during the biggest economic boom of the century, how are they going to cope with the bad times?

[temeculaguy]

Guitar187, interesting id, you’ll have to explain guitar “murder” (the penal code 187) at a later date, I bet it’s a good story. Welcome aboard, 1st post I’ve seem from you and it was an intelligent one. Don’t let the op’s venom get to you, it had a point. Most of us could care less that that the conforming loan limit will be raised, it’s repackaging of cigarettes. Marlborro lights don’t make anyone think they are suddenly good for you, the cat is out of the bag about the negative health effects of cigarettes and the cat is also out of the bag with regards to the r/e bubble. The bounce that R/E will get will be short lived because the reason the bubble started wasn’t the rate but the liar loans made to people who lacked the ability to pay them back. No investor is going to loan 700k to someone who can’t prove their income and everyone who can prove it already has a house. The perception that R/E can’t go down fueled the bubble, that party is over for at least a decade, now people will evaluate the next ten years when buying, not the next ten months. Truth be told, a national dollar cap is absurd, we live in a different world than the rest of the country, the stimulus package is also out of whack, what homeowner makes less than 75k gross in So Cal? Nothing will deny the invisible hand, no matter how much sugar they put in the kool aid, the line to drink it will be nearly empty.

[temeculaguy]

Guitar187, interesting id, you’ll have to explain guitar “murder” (the penal code 187) at a later date, I bet it’s a good story. Welcome aboard, 1st post I’ve seem from you and it was an intelligent one. Don’t let the op’s venom get to you, it had a point. Most of us could care less that that the conforming loan limit will be raised, it’s repackaging of cigarettes. Marlborro lights don’t make anyone think they are suddenly good for you, the cat is out of the bag about the negative health effects of cigarettes and the cat is also out of the bag with regards to the r/e bubble. The bounce that R/E will get will be short lived because the reason the bubble started wasn’t the rate but the liar loans made to people who lacked the ability to pay them back. No investor is going to loan 700k to someone who can’t prove their income and everyone who can prove it already has a house. The perception that R/E can’t go down fueled the bubble, that party is over for at least a decade, now people will evaluate the next ten years when buying, not the next ten months. Truth be told, a national dollar cap is absurd, we live in a different world than the rest of the country, the stimulus package is also out of whack, what homeowner makes less than 75k gross in So Cal? Nothing will deny the invisible hand, no matter how much sugar they put in the kool aid, the line to drink it will be nearly empty.

[temeculaguy]

Guitar187, interesting id, you’ll have to explain guitar “murder” (the penal code 187) at a later date, I bet it’s a good story. Welcome aboard, 1st post I’ve seem from you and it was an intelligent one. Don’t let the op’s venom get to you, it had a point. Most of us could care less that that the conforming loan limit will be raised, it’s repackaging of cigarettes. Marlborro lights don’t make anyone think they are suddenly good for you, the cat is out of the bag about the negative health effects of cigarettes and the cat is also out of the bag with regards to the r/e bubble. The bounce that R/E will get will be short lived because the reason the bubble started wasn’t the rate but the liar loans made to people who lacked the ability to pay them back. No investor is going to loan 700k to someone who can’t prove their income and everyone who can prove it already has a house. The perception that R/E can’t go down fueled the bubble, that party is over for at least a decade, now people will evaluate the next ten years when buying, not the next ten months. Truth be told, a national dollar cap is absurd, we live in a different world than the rest of the country, the stimulus package is also out of whack, what homeowner makes less than 75k gross in So Cal? Nothing will deny the invisible hand, no matter how much sugar they put in the kool aid, the line to drink it will be nearly empty.

[temeculaguy]

Guitar187, interesting id, you’ll have to explain guitar “murder” (the penal code 187) at a later date, I bet it’s a good story. Welcome aboard, 1st post I’ve seem from you and it was an intelligent one. Don’t let the op’s venom get to you, it had a point. Most of us could care less that that the conforming loan limit will be raised, it’s repackaging of cigarettes. Marlborro lights don’t make anyone think they are suddenly good for you, the cat is out of the bag about the negative health effects of cigarettes and the cat is also out of the bag with regards to the r/e bubble. The bounce that R/E will get will be short lived because the reason the bubble started wasn’t the rate but the liar loans made to people who lacked the ability to pay them back. No investor is going to loan 700k to someone who can’t prove their income and everyone who can prove it already has a house. The perception that R/E can’t go down fueled the bubble, that party is over for at least a decade, now people will evaluate the next ten years when buying, not the next ten months. Truth be told, a national dollar cap is absurd, we live in a different world than the rest of the country, the stimulus package is also out of whack, what homeowner makes less than 75k gross in So Cal? Nothing will deny the invisible hand, no matter how much sugar they put in the kool aid, the line to drink it will be nearly empty.

[temeculaguy]

Guitar187, interesting id, you’ll have to explain guitar “murder” (the penal code 187) at a later date, I bet it’s a good story. Welcome aboard, 1st post I’ve seem from you and it was an intelligent one. Don’t let the op’s venom get to you, it had a point. Most of us could care less that that the conforming loan limit will be raised, it’s repackaging of cigarettes. Marlborro lights don’t make anyone think they are suddenly good for you, the cat is out of the bag about the negative health effects of cigarettes and the cat is also out of the bag with regards to the r/e bubble. The bounce that R/E will get will be short lived because the reason the bubble started wasn’t the rate but the liar loans made to people who lacked the ability to pay them back. No investor is going to loan 700k to someone who can’t prove their income and everyone who can prove it already has a house. The perception that R/E can’t go down fueled the bubble, that party is over for at least a decade, now people will evaluate the next ten years when buying, not the next ten months. Truth be told, a national dollar cap is absurd, we live in a different world than the rest of the country, the stimulus package is also out of whack, what homeowner makes less than 75k gross in So Cal? Nothing will deny the invisible hand, no matter how much sugar they put in the kool aid, the line to drink it will be nearly empty.

[temeculaguy]

Tony, it’s virtually impossible for me to give the street boundaries, it’s way too confusing. I could bore you with the history and specifics but I will spare you. You can always call the HOA to find out.

http://www.redhawkcommunity.com/

or you can e-mail me at [email protected] While I am not involved in R/E or the HOA, I have this weird thing about research and I’ve been here long enough that I know every street and watched all of the tracts get built. There are a couple of fill in tracts that seem to be surrounded by Redhawk and Vail Ranch is mostly to the East but Redhawk wraps around it. It doesn’t matter because wherever you live as long as you get to drive through it on your way home it’s pretty. Bridlevale is a fill in that has it’s own HOA, even has a pool so it looks pretty good, it might as well be in redhawk. The one to watch out for is Vail, there is no HOA and in most of the tracts it is noticable, especially the smaller and cheaper ones. Some of the neighborhoods look fine but it’s a crapshoot and you have no recourse for year round holiday lighting or wacky paint jobs. Good rule of thumb, if it has an HOA that is listed as $28-$30, it is in Redhawk. All of the gated tracts other than Vail Creek are in Redhwak. Before you buy, call the HOA, so many of the realtors are carpetbaggers and have no clue who’s who in the zoo. Usually just driving by is all you need to do and it will be obvious.

[temeculaguy]

Tony, it’s virtually impossible for me to give the street boundaries, it’s way too confusing. I could bore you with the history and specifics but I will spare you. You can always call the HOA to find out.

http://www.redhawkcommunity.com/

or you can e-mail me at [email protected] While I am not involved in R/E or the HOA, I have this weird thing about research and I’ve been here long enough that I know every street and watched all of the tracts get built. There are a couple of fill in tracts that seem to be surrounded by Redhawk and Vail Ranch is mostly to the East but Redhawk wraps around it. It doesn’t matter because wherever you live as long as you get to drive through it on your way home it’s pretty. Bridlevale is a fill in that has it’s own HOA, even has a pool so it looks pretty good, it might as well be in redhawk. The one to watch out for is Vail, there is no HOA and in most of the tracts it is noticable, especially the smaller and cheaper ones. Some of the neighborhoods look fine but it’s a crapshoot and you have no recourse for year round holiday lighting or wacky paint jobs. Good rule of thumb, if it has an HOA that is listed as $28-$30, it is in Redhawk. All of the gated tracts other than Vail Creek are in Redhwak. Before you buy, call the HOA, so many of the realtors are carpetbaggers and have no clue who’s who in the zoo. Usually just driving by is all you need to do and it will be obvious.

[temeculaguy]

Tony, it’s virtually impossible for me to give the street boundaries, it’s way too confusing. I could bore you with the history and specifics but I will spare you. You can always call the HOA to find out.

http://www.redhawkcommunity.com/

or you can e-mail me at [email protected] While I am not involved in R/E or the HOA, I have this weird thing about research and I’ve been here long enough that I know every street and watched all of the tracts get built. There are a couple of fill in tracts that seem to be surrounded by Redhawk and Vail Ranch is mostly to the East but Redhawk wraps around it. It doesn’t matter because wherever you live as long as you get to drive through it on your way home it’s pretty. Bridlevale is a fill in that has it’s own HOA, even has a pool so it looks pretty good, it might as well be in redhawk. The one to watch out for is Vail, there is no HOA and in most of the tracts it is noticable, especially the smaller and cheaper ones. Some of the neighborhoods look fine but it’s a crapshoot and you have no recourse for year round holiday lighting or wacky paint jobs. Good rule of thumb, if it has an HOA that is listed as $28-$30, it is in Redhawk. All of the gated tracts other than Vail Creek are in Redhwak. Before you buy, call the HOA, so many of the realtors are carpetbaggers and have no clue who’s who in the zoo. Usually just driving by is all you need to do and it will be obvious.

[temeculaguy]

Tony, it’s virtually impossible for me to give the street boundaries, it’s way too confusing. I could bore you with the history and specifics but I will spare you. You can always call the HOA to find out.

http://www.redhawkcommunity.com/

or you can e-mail me at [email protected] While I am not involved in R/E or the HOA, I have this weird thing about research and I’ve been here long enough that I know every street and watched all of the tracts get built. There are a couple of fill in tracts that seem to be surrounded by Redhawk and Vail Ranch is mostly to the East but Redhawk wraps around it. It doesn’t matter because wherever you live as long as you get to drive through it on your way home it’s pretty. Bridlevale is a fill in that has it’s own HOA, even has a pool so it looks pretty good, it might as well be in redhawk. The one to watch out for is Vail, there is no HOA and in most of the tracts it is noticable, especially the smaller and cheaper ones. Some of the neighborhoods look fine but it’s a crapshoot and you have no recourse for year round holiday lighting or wacky paint jobs. Good rule of thumb, if it has an HOA that is listed as $28-$30, it is in Redhawk. All of the gated tracts other than Vail Creek are in Redhwak. Before you buy, call the HOA, so many of the realtors are carpetbaggers and have no clue who’s who in the zoo. Usually just driving by is all you need to do and it will be obvious.

[temeculaguy]

Tony, it’s virtually impossible for me to give the street boundaries, it’s way too confusing. I could bore you with the history and specifics but I will spare you. You can always call the HOA to find out.

http://www.redhawkcommunity.com/

or you can e-mail me at [email protected] While I am not involved in R/E or the HOA, I have this weird thing about research and I’ve been here long enough that I know every street and watched all of the tracts get built. There are a couple of fill in tracts that seem to be surrounded by Redhawk and Vail Ranch is mostly to the East but Redhawk wraps around it. It doesn’t matter because wherever you live as long as you get to drive through it on your way home it’s pretty. Bridlevale is a fill in that has it’s own HOA, even has a pool so it looks pretty good, it might as well be in redhawk. The one to watch out for is Vail, there is no HOA and in most of the tracts it is noticable, especially the smaller and cheaper ones. Some of the neighborhoods look fine but it’s a crapshoot and you have no recourse for year round holiday lighting or wacky paint jobs. Good rule of thumb, if it has an HOA that is listed as $28-$30, it is in Redhawk. All of the gated tracts other than Vail Creek are in Redhwak. Before you buy, call the HOA, so many of the realtors are carpetbaggers and have no clue who’s who in the zoo. Usually just driving by is all you need to do and it will be obvious.

[Author]

Posts