[temeculaguy]

ditto what snail said, did anyone go? I have 6 properties that I’d like to know what they sold for just out of curiosity.

I did find out today about another property not in this auction that was one of those super low list priced jobs that sparked a bidding war, it ended up selling for 16k over the list price and the list price was 100k below anything comparable for sale, so I’m curious if these auctions will bring in much over the opening bid.

[temeculaguy]

ditto what snail said, did anyone go? I have 6 properties that I’d like to know what they sold for just out of curiosity.

I did find out today about another property not in this auction that was one of those super low list priced jobs that sparked a bidding war, it ended up selling for 16k over the list price and the list price was 100k below anything comparable for sale, so I’m curious if these auctions will bring in much over the opening bid.

[temeculaguy]

ditto what snail said, did anyone go? I have 6 properties that I’d like to know what they sold for just out of curiosity.

I did find out today about another property not in this auction that was one of those super low list priced jobs that sparked a bidding war, it ended up selling for 16k over the list price and the list price was 100k below anything comparable for sale, so I’m curious if these auctions will bring in much over the opening bid.

[temeculaguy]

ditto what snail said, did anyone go? I have 6 properties that I’d like to know what they sold for just out of curiosity.

I did find out today about another property not in this auction that was one of those super low list priced jobs that sparked a bidding war, it ended up selling for 16k over the list price and the list price was 100k below anything comparable for sale, so I’m curious if these auctions will bring in much over the opening bid.

[temeculaguy]

Here are the rules according to TG (actively dating, while raising two teens). These only apply to divorced people, widows/widower is a different dynamic that I haven’t put enough thought into.

1. I’d never date someone without children again, they have too much free time that I can’t match and they don’t get the next rule.

2. I’m never meeting her children in person and she’s never meeting mine unil they are old enough to vote or at least drive, but voting age is preferable.

That’s it, that’s all you need to do to raise completely healthy kids. All opposite sex adults are a threat to their time and love from their parent. Grown up, divorced parents have one priority in life, if they seek a diversion or physical contact then discretion and privacy is the only way they can accomplish it. Most divorced parents share custody equally these days so it’s easy to have two lives and keep them apart, having to confine all of your affection, adult companionship and sex into two or three days a week is completely workable and most married couples do that anyway. The best single mother’s I’ve met share this philosiphy and the mother’s that want to move in together/merge families/meet each other’s kids aren’t very good mothers anyways and end up not being the type of women I’d want my kids to meet. I’ve met a number of women over the years who seem to move in with a new guy every year or so and bring the kids along, having to move out when there is a fight or they realize they don’t like each other. That’s no way to establish the comfortable, solid place that a child calls “home.”

[temeculaguy]

Here are the rules according to TG (actively dating, while raising two teens). These only apply to divorced people, widows/widower is a different dynamic that I haven’t put enough thought into.

1. I’d never date someone without children again, they have too much free time that I can’t match and they don’t get the next rule.

2. I’m never meeting her children in person and she’s never meeting mine unil they are old enough to vote or at least drive, but voting age is preferable.

That’s it, that’s all you need to do to raise completely healthy kids. All opposite sex adults are a threat to their time and love from their parent. Grown up, divorced parents have one priority in life, if they seek a diversion or physical contact then discretion and privacy is the only way they can accomplish it. Most divorced parents share custody equally these days so it’s easy to have two lives and keep them apart, having to confine all of your affection, adult companionship and sex into two or three days a week is completely workable and most married couples do that anyway. The best single mother’s I’ve met share this philosiphy and the mother’s that want to move in together/merge families/meet each other’s kids aren’t very good mothers anyways and end up not being the type of women I’d want my kids to meet. I’ve met a number of women over the years who seem to move in with a new guy every year or so and bring the kids along, having to move out when there is a fight or they realize they don’t like each other. That’s no way to establish the comfortable, solid place that a child calls “home.”

[temeculaguy]

Here are the rules according to TG (actively dating, while raising two teens). These only apply to divorced people, widows/widower is a different dynamic that I haven’t put enough thought into.

1. I’d never date someone without children again, they have too much free time that I can’t match and they don’t get the next rule.

2. I’m never meeting her children in person and she’s never meeting mine unil they are old enough to vote or at least drive, but voting age is preferable.

That’s it, that’s all you need to do to raise completely healthy kids. All opposite sex adults are a threat to their time and love from their parent. Grown up, divorced parents have one priority in life, if they seek a diversion or physical contact then discretion and privacy is the only way they can accomplish it. Most divorced parents share custody equally these days so it’s easy to have two lives and keep them apart, having to confine all of your affection, adult companionship and sex into two or three days a week is completely workable and most married couples do that anyway. The best single mother’s I’ve met share this philosiphy and the mother’s that want to move in together/merge families/meet each other’s kids aren’t very good mothers anyways and end up not being the type of women I’d want my kids to meet. I’ve met a number of women over the years who seem to move in with a new guy every year or so and bring the kids along, having to move out when there is a fight or they realize they don’t like each other. That’s no way to establish the comfortable, solid place that a child calls “home.”

[temeculaguy]

Here are the rules according to TG (actively dating, while raising two teens). These only apply to divorced people, widows/widower is a different dynamic that I haven’t put enough thought into.

1. I’d never date someone without children again, they have too much free time that I can’t match and they don’t get the next rule.

2. I’m never meeting her children in person and she’s never meeting mine unil they are old enough to vote or at least drive, but voting age is preferable.

That’s it, that’s all you need to do to raise completely healthy kids. All opposite sex adults are a threat to their time and love from their parent. Grown up, divorced parents have one priority in life, if they seek a diversion or physical contact then discretion and privacy is the only way they can accomplish it. Most divorced parents share custody equally these days so it’s easy to have two lives and keep them apart, having to confine all of your affection, adult companionship and sex into two or three days a week is completely workable and most married couples do that anyway. The best single mother’s I’ve met share this philosiphy and the mother’s that want to move in together/merge families/meet each other’s kids aren’t very good mothers anyways and end up not being the type of women I’d want my kids to meet. I’ve met a number of women over the years who seem to move in with a new guy every year or so and bring the kids along, having to move out when there is a fight or they realize they don’t like each other. That’s no way to establish the comfortable, solid place that a child calls “home.”

[temeculaguy]

Here are the rules according to TG (actively dating, while raising two teens). These only apply to divorced people, widows/widower is a different dynamic that I haven’t put enough thought into.

1. I’d never date someone without children again, they have too much free time that I can’t match and they don’t get the next rule.

2. I’m never meeting her children in person and she’s never meeting mine unil they are old enough to vote or at least drive, but voting age is preferable.

That’s it, that’s all you need to do to raise completely healthy kids. All opposite sex adults are a threat to their time and love from their parent. Grown up, divorced parents have one priority in life, if they seek a diversion or physical contact then discretion and privacy is the only way they can accomplish it. Most divorced parents share custody equally these days so it’s easy to have two lives and keep them apart, having to confine all of your affection, adult companionship and sex into two or three days a week is completely workable and most married couples do that anyway. The best single mother’s I’ve met share this philosiphy and the mother’s that want to move in together/merge families/meet each other’s kids aren’t very good mothers anyways and end up not being the type of women I’d want my kids to meet. I’ve met a number of women over the years who seem to move in with a new guy every year or so and bring the kids along, having to move out when there is a fight or they realize they don’t like each other. That’s no way to establish the comfortable, solid place that a child calls “home.”

[temeculaguy]

It pains me to say this, if fact I vomitted a little bit in my mouth just thinking about it, but I agree with matt. Just rent for a year, sfr’s are coming down, you’ll be able to get a 1500 sq fter in paloma or vail ranch by summers end at that price that wont be a fixer.

Where matt is completely wrong is telling someone who is commuting South to live in harveston, matt you hate it there anyway, I’ll give you the fact that you have costco and harry’s pacific grill is filled with hotties every day, other than that, there’s no reason to go north of rancho cal. The traffic for the 7 or 8 miles from Rainbow canyon road to Winchester will double your commute, it always sucks but the ride to the rainbow exit is usually 70 mph and since he is driving to fallbrook he only has to go on the freeway for one offramp (mission to rainbow canyon) that’s hardly a commute. I could go into a diatribe about the quality of the people in the north vs south debate and how I’ve spent years on both sides but I’ll just put it to you this way, who would you live by? TG or Matt? End of debate.

[temeculaguy]

It pains me to say this, if fact I vomitted a little bit in my mouth just thinking about it, but I agree with matt. Just rent for a year, sfr’s are coming down, you’ll be able to get a 1500 sq fter in paloma or vail ranch by summers end at that price that wont be a fixer.

Where matt is completely wrong is telling someone who is commuting South to live in harveston, matt you hate it there anyway, I’ll give you the fact that you have costco and harry’s pacific grill is filled with hotties every day, other than that, there’s no reason to go north of rancho cal. The traffic for the 7 or 8 miles from Rainbow canyon road to Winchester will double your commute, it always sucks but the ride to the rainbow exit is usually 70 mph and since he is driving to fallbrook he only has to go on the freeway for one offramp (mission to rainbow canyon) that’s hardly a commute. I could go into a diatribe about the quality of the people in the north vs south debate and how I’ve spent years on both sides but I’ll just put it to you this way, who would you live by? TG or Matt? End of debate.

[temeculaguy]

It pains me to say this, if fact I vomitted a little bit in my mouth just thinking about it, but I agree with matt. Just rent for a year, sfr’s are coming down, you’ll be able to get a 1500 sq fter in paloma or vail ranch by summers end at that price that wont be a fixer.

Where matt is completely wrong is telling someone who is commuting South to live in harveston, matt you hate it there anyway, I’ll give you the fact that you have costco and harry’s pacific grill is filled with hotties every day, other than that, there’s no reason to go north of rancho cal. The traffic for the 7 or 8 miles from Rainbow canyon road to Winchester will double your commute, it always sucks but the ride to the rainbow exit is usually 70 mph and since he is driving to fallbrook he only has to go on the freeway for one offramp (mission to rainbow canyon) that’s hardly a commute. I could go into a diatribe about the quality of the people in the north vs south debate and how I’ve spent years on both sides but I’ll just put it to you this way, who would you live by? TG or Matt? End of debate.

[temeculaguy]

It pains me to say this, if fact I vomitted a little bit in my mouth just thinking about it, but I agree with matt. Just rent for a year, sfr’s are coming down, you’ll be able to get a 1500 sq fter in paloma or vail ranch by summers end at that price that wont be a fixer.

Where matt is completely wrong is telling someone who is commuting South to live in harveston, matt you hate it there anyway, I’ll give you the fact that you have costco and harry’s pacific grill is filled with hotties every day, other than that, there’s no reason to go north of rancho cal. The traffic for the 7 or 8 miles from Rainbow canyon road to Winchester will double your commute, it always sucks but the ride to the rainbow exit is usually 70 mph and since he is driving to fallbrook he only has to go on the freeway for one offramp (mission to rainbow canyon) that’s hardly a commute. I could go into a diatribe about the quality of the people in the north vs south debate and how I’ve spent years on both sides but I’ll just put it to you this way, who would you live by? TG or Matt? End of debate.

[temeculaguy]

It pains me to say this, if fact I vomitted a little bit in my mouth just thinking about it, but I agree with matt. Just rent for a year, sfr’s are coming down, you’ll be able to get a 1500 sq fter in paloma or vail ranch by summers end at that price that wont be a fixer.

Where matt is completely wrong is telling someone who is commuting South to live in harveston, matt you hate it there anyway, I’ll give you the fact that you have costco and harry’s pacific grill is filled with hotties every day, other than that, there’s no reason to go north of rancho cal. The traffic for the 7 or 8 miles from Rainbow canyon road to Winchester will double your commute, it always sucks but the ride to the rainbow exit is usually 70 mph and since he is driving to fallbrook he only has to go on the freeway for one offramp (mission to rainbow canyon) that’s hardly a commute. I could go into a diatribe about the quality of the people in the north vs south debate and how I’ve spent years on both sides but I’ll just put it to you this way, who would you live by? TG or Matt? End of debate.

[temeculaguy]

Matt, The taxes I quoted was based on the posted taxes, 2006 $6037 based on a tax valuation of 436k. 220k is close to half, thus resetting the taxes to the new sale price, probably about 3600 or 300 a month, insurance being no more than 100 a month on a 220k property. On zillow it listed the taxes at 3000 in 2004, with a valuation of 175 for the first 9 months of the year and then jumped to 6000 for 2005 because it sold for 415k at the end of august 2004. I very much doubt the taxes would be 4800 a year for a 220k sales price, 3600 is a much better estimate, the 3k on 175 included 1750 for the 1% and the add ons that are mostly fixed per lot, adding 45k to the sales price should add 450 a year plus another 150 for the value based add ons, making 3600 damn close.

Nobody said you had to pay full price and even if it goes for that, there are so many more coming available with great prices that they wont be exeptional, but rather the norm, the original reason for this thread.

[Author]

Posts