Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
temeculaguy
Participantgreat post bear, I was hoping you would come in and pinch hit!! My theory on acreage is similar to my theory on boats, have friends with them, be a good guest and avoid all the work. So when people ask about de luz or la cresta, etc., since my only exposure is drinking at a party, all I can say is “nice houses” that’s about it.
Bear is right, the road plans are real but they hem and haw over the specifics and haven’t really done much lately. The east end of deer hollow is going to be an engineering feat when they try to connect it, I’ve stood at the dead end of that 4 laner and it just drops into oblivian a few hundred feet. They wont be able to grade and pave, sometimes I wonder if they made a mistake and gave up. All the money they are putting into the 79 interchange and pechanga parkway, I wonder if they are really going to put in the butterfield bypass for a decade or two, the pechaga parkway expansion finally started and with the construction slowdown the bids were all well below what they budgeted so maybe we will see some movement on the anza rd plans now that it is cheaper.
Bear, your predictions are an track for the specific price points in specific neighborhoods.
Temeku, don’t lose too much sleep, Morgan will always be a nice place to live. I’ve seen the plans for the eastern bypass that was supposed to run from the 15 to Pechanga and up through Morgan on Butterfield and then Butterfield could take you all the way to winchester road, bypassing temecula entirely, so someone going to hemet or the wine country would never enter the city. The snag to that is the financial interests and sales taxes, allowing tourists to bypass the gas, retail and food on 79s and rancho cal isn’t in the city’s best interest and the chamber and others will be quietly against it. It makes sense but planners get nudges and sections don’t get finished in municipalities somehow when they will hurt revenue. It may go through but it wont be the path of least resistance so you wont end up living next to the autobahn. Ever notice how the only viable ways to travel North/South (Ynez or Margarita), both somehow twist and turn so you end up driving right by the Mall. That stuff is on purpose.
Participantgreat post bear, I was hoping you would come in and pinch hit!! My theory on acreage is similar to my theory on boats, have friends with them, be a good guest and avoid all the work. So when people ask about de luz or la cresta, etc., since my only exposure is drinking at a party, all I can say is “nice houses” that’s about it.
Bear is right, the road plans are real but they hem and haw over the specifics and haven’t really done much lately. The east end of deer hollow is going to be an engineering feat when they try to connect it, I’ve stood at the dead end of that 4 laner and it just drops into oblivian a few hundred feet. They wont be able to grade and pave, sometimes I wonder if they made a mistake and gave up. All the money they are putting into the 79 interchange and pechanga parkway, I wonder if they are really going to put in the butterfield bypass for a decade or two, the pechaga parkway expansion finally started and with the construction slowdown the bids were all well below what they budgeted so maybe we will see some movement on the anza rd plans now that it is cheaper.
Bear, your predictions are an track for the specific price points in specific neighborhoods.
Temeku, don’t lose too much sleep, Morgan will always be a nice place to live. I’ve seen the plans for the eastern bypass that was supposed to run from the 15 to Pechanga and up through Morgan on Butterfield and then Butterfield could take you all the way to winchester road, bypassing temecula entirely, so someone going to hemet or the wine country would never enter the city. The snag to that is the financial interests and sales taxes, allowing tourists to bypass the gas, retail and food on 79s and rancho cal isn’t in the city’s best interest and the chamber and others will be quietly against it. It makes sense but planners get nudges and sections don’t get finished in municipalities somehow when they will hurt revenue. It may go through but it wont be the path of least resistance so you wont end up living next to the autobahn. Ever notice how the only viable ways to travel North/South (Ynez or Margarita), both somehow twist and turn so you end up driving right by the Mall. That stuff is on purpose.
Participantgreat post bear, I was hoping you would come in and pinch hit!! My theory on acreage is similar to my theory on boats, have friends with them, be a good guest and avoid all the work. So when people ask about de luz or la cresta, etc., since my only exposure is drinking at a party, all I can say is “nice houses” that’s about it.
Bear is right, the road plans are real but they hem and haw over the specifics and haven’t really done much lately. The east end of deer hollow is going to be an engineering feat when they try to connect it, I’ve stood at the dead end of that 4 laner and it just drops into oblivian a few hundred feet. They wont be able to grade and pave, sometimes I wonder if they made a mistake and gave up. All the money they are putting into the 79 interchange and pechanga parkway, I wonder if they are really going to put in the butterfield bypass for a decade or two, the pechaga parkway expansion finally started and with the construction slowdown the bids were all well below what they budgeted so maybe we will see some movement on the anza rd plans now that it is cheaper.
Bear, your predictions are an track for the specific price points in specific neighborhoods.
Temeku, don’t lose too much sleep, Morgan will always be a nice place to live. I’ve seen the plans for the eastern bypass that was supposed to run from the 15 to Pechanga and up through Morgan on Butterfield and then Butterfield could take you all the way to winchester road, bypassing temecula entirely, so someone going to hemet or the wine country would never enter the city. The snag to that is the financial interests and sales taxes, allowing tourists to bypass the gas, retail and food on 79s and rancho cal isn’t in the city’s best interest and the chamber and others will be quietly against it. It makes sense but planners get nudges and sections don’t get finished in municipalities somehow when they will hurt revenue. It may go through but it wont be the path of least resistance so you wont end up living next to the autobahn. Ever notice how the only viable ways to travel North/South (Ynez or Margarita), both somehow twist and turn so you end up driving right by the Mall. That stuff is on purpose.
ParticipantYes this is the third time in the last few years it’s been there, we are a few bad days from a new recent low. The last couple of times there were screams for the fed to act but the fed is out of bullets and may be going the other way as far as rates. The warnings of bailing out wallstreet on the backs of consumers and inflation are now a reality, felt at the pumps and the grocery store. I think things will head lower because there is nobody to save it, we will just have to wait and see. I can’t brag about how much I’ve lost or made, I shred my statements before opening them these days, I’d prefer not to know right now but even I can tell the index funds aren’t doing well. Thank god for dollar cost averaging.
ParticipantYes this is the third time in the last few years it’s been there, we are a few bad days from a new recent low. The last couple of times there were screams for the fed to act but the fed is out of bullets and may be going the other way as far as rates. The warnings of bailing out wallstreet on the backs of consumers and inflation are now a reality, felt at the pumps and the grocery store. I think things will head lower because there is nobody to save it, we will just have to wait and see. I can’t brag about how much I’ve lost or made, I shred my statements before opening them these days, I’d prefer not to know right now but even I can tell the index funds aren’t doing well. Thank god for dollar cost averaging.
ParticipantYes this is the third time in the last few years it’s been there, we are a few bad days from a new recent low. The last couple of times there were screams for the fed to act but the fed is out of bullets and may be going the other way as far as rates. The warnings of bailing out wallstreet on the backs of consumers and inflation are now a reality, felt at the pumps and the grocery store. I think things will head lower because there is nobody to save it, we will just have to wait and see. I can’t brag about how much I’ve lost or made, I shred my statements before opening them these days, I’d prefer not to know right now but even I can tell the index funds aren’t doing well. Thank god for dollar cost averaging.
ParticipantYes this is the third time in the last few years it’s been there, we are a few bad days from a new recent low. The last couple of times there were screams for the fed to act but the fed is out of bullets and may be going the other way as far as rates. The warnings of bailing out wallstreet on the backs of consumers and inflation are now a reality, felt at the pumps and the grocery store. I think things will head lower because there is nobody to save it, we will just have to wait and see. I can’t brag about how much I’ve lost or made, I shred my statements before opening them these days, I’d prefer not to know right now but even I can tell the index funds aren’t doing well. Thank god for dollar cost averaging.
ParticipantYes this is the third time in the last few years it’s been there, we are a few bad days from a new recent low. The last couple of times there were screams for the fed to act but the fed is out of bullets and may be going the other way as far as rates. The warnings of bailing out wallstreet on the backs of consumers and inflation are now a reality, felt at the pumps and the grocery store. I think things will head lower because there is nobody to save it, we will just have to wait and see. I can’t brag about how much I’ve lost or made, I shred my statements before opening them these days, I’d prefer not to know right now but even I can tell the index funds aren’t doing well. Thank god for dollar cost averaging.
ParticipantHaving already been down this road once, here is what I did differently this time and so far so good. The following things were all done online for free on public websites and I only know how to do them in Riverside county, not sure if the info is available online or in person in other counties.
1. Ran the property for NOD’s (not always effective because how late in the game nods are filed)
2. Looked at the purchase date (2003 and older)
3. Ran the owner in the grantee search for nods/nots on other properties, refi’s and cash out
4. Ran the owner in the criminal and civil court superior court website, checked for small claims, lawsuits, etc.
5. Only rented a place that had been a rental for years, not a “new” rental that the owner was moving out of, huge red flag and what happened the first time.
6. When it came time to fill out the application, I explained the previous rental repo’d for why I was moving and I just asked them if they were in a position to keep the rental for at least a year in the future and made sure the lease did not require that allow showing to buyers during the lease but would allow future renters to inspect the property during my final 30 days and of course landlord inspections that were scheduled (renting a place in the mls sucks).
7. Finally, wehn it was time to pay for the credit check, I asked if I could pay double and run their credit, I’ll show you mine if you show me yours, since we were both taking a blind risk on a stranger, they agreed, but then I didn’t do it because the fact that they would was good enough for me.Thats the best you can do or all that I could think of. Caveat Emptor
ParticipantHaving already been down this road once, here is what I did differently this time and so far so good. The following things were all done online for free on public websites and I only know how to do them in Riverside county, not sure if the info is available online or in person in other counties.
1. Ran the property for NOD’s (not always effective because how late in the game nods are filed)
2. Looked at the purchase date (2003 and older)
3. Ran the owner in the grantee search for nods/nots on other properties, refi’s and cash out
4. Ran the owner in the criminal and civil court superior court website, checked for small claims, lawsuits, etc.
5. Only rented a place that had been a rental for years, not a “new” rental that the owner was moving out of, huge red flag and what happened the first time.
6. When it came time to fill out the application, I explained the previous rental repo’d for why I was moving and I just asked them if they were in a position to keep the rental for at least a year in the future and made sure the lease did not require that allow showing to buyers during the lease but would allow future renters to inspect the property during my final 30 days and of course landlord inspections that were scheduled (renting a place in the mls sucks).
7. Finally, wehn it was time to pay for the credit check, I asked if I could pay double and run their credit, I’ll show you mine if you show me yours, since we were both taking a blind risk on a stranger, they agreed, but then I didn’t do it because the fact that they would was good enough for me.Thats the best you can do or all that I could think of. Caveat Emptor
ParticipantHaving already been down this road once, here is what I did differently this time and so far so good. The following things were all done online for free on public websites and I only know how to do them in Riverside county, not sure if the info is available online or in person in other counties.
1. Ran the property for NOD’s (not always effective because how late in the game nods are filed)
2. Looked at the purchase date (2003 and older)
3. Ran the owner in the grantee search for nods/nots on other properties, refi’s and cash out
4. Ran the owner in the criminal and civil court superior court website, checked for small claims, lawsuits, etc.
5. Only rented a place that had been a rental for years, not a “new” rental that the owner was moving out of, huge red flag and what happened the first time.
6. When it came time to fill out the application, I explained the previous rental repo’d for why I was moving and I just asked them if they were in a position to keep the rental for at least a year in the future and made sure the lease did not require that allow showing to buyers during the lease but would allow future renters to inspect the property during my final 30 days and of course landlord inspections that were scheduled (renting a place in the mls sucks).
7. Finally, wehn it was time to pay for the credit check, I asked if I could pay double and run their credit, I’ll show you mine if you show me yours, since we were both taking a blind risk on a stranger, they agreed, but then I didn’t do it because the fact that they would was good enough for me.Thats the best you can do or all that I could think of. Caveat Emptor
ParticipantHaving already been down this road once, here is what I did differently this time and so far so good. The following things were all done online for free on public websites and I only know how to do them in Riverside county, not sure if the info is available online or in person in other counties.
1. Ran the property for NOD’s (not always effective because how late in the game nods are filed)
2. Looked at the purchase date (2003 and older)
3. Ran the owner in the grantee search for nods/nots on other properties, refi’s and cash out
4. Ran the owner in the criminal and civil court superior court website, checked for small claims, lawsuits, etc.
5. Only rented a place that had been a rental for years, not a “new” rental that the owner was moving out of, huge red flag and what happened the first time.
6. When it came time to fill out the application, I explained the previous rental repo’d for why I was moving and I just asked them if they were in a position to keep the rental for at least a year in the future and made sure the lease did not require that allow showing to buyers during the lease but would allow future renters to inspect the property during my final 30 days and of course landlord inspections that were scheduled (renting a place in the mls sucks).
7. Finally, wehn it was time to pay for the credit check, I asked if I could pay double and run their credit, I’ll show you mine if you show me yours, since we were both taking a blind risk on a stranger, they agreed, but then I didn’t do it because the fact that they would was good enough for me.Thats the best you can do or all that I could think of. Caveat Emptor
ParticipantHaving already been down this road once, here is what I did differently this time and so far so good. The following things were all done online for free on public websites and I only know how to do them in Riverside county, not sure if the info is available online or in person in other counties.
1. Ran the property for NOD’s (not always effective because how late in the game nods are filed)
2. Looked at the purchase date (2003 and older)
3. Ran the owner in the grantee search for nods/nots on other properties, refi’s and cash out
4. Ran the owner in the criminal and civil court superior court website, checked for small claims, lawsuits, etc.
5. Only rented a place that had been a rental for years, not a “new” rental that the owner was moving out of, huge red flag and what happened the first time.
6. When it came time to fill out the application, I explained the previous rental repo’d for why I was moving and I just asked them if they were in a position to keep the rental for at least a year in the future and made sure the lease did not require that allow showing to buyers during the lease but would allow future renters to inspect the property during my final 30 days and of course landlord inspections that were scheduled (renting a place in the mls sucks).
7. Finally, wehn it was time to pay for the credit check, I asked if I could pay double and run their credit, I’ll show you mine if you show me yours, since we were both taking a blind risk on a stranger, they agreed, but then I didn’t do it because the fact that they would was good enough for me.Thats the best you can do or all that I could think of. Caveat Emptor
ParticipantThis country values human life and personal rights over property, always will. That is why the punishment for theft, burglary and robbery are different. If someone sneaks into walmart at night and steals $100 worth of stuff vs. sneaking into your home while you are at work and steals $100 worth of stuff vs. pointing a gun in your face and making you hand over $100 (or even just threatening to beat you). Three different penalties with the one done with a threat to your person being the harshest and the one done at a business or a vehicle being lower than the residence. If the law is designed to discourage certain behaviors more than others, I would prefer not being present if I were to have $100 stolen. And if I could pick between having my car ransacked or my house, I’d prefer the car. Another example is if a theif steals your car from a parking lot, the crime is not eligible for 3 strikes, if they steal it with you and your kids in it (carjacking), the penaly is harsher and it is 3 strikes eligible, take my car, leave me and my kids out of the whole transaction. If the penalties were the same there would be more carjackings and less garden variety car theft. Things are fine the way they are, if it’s my money or my life, take my money, I’ll get more.
On another note not related to criminal law 101, I am suprised we haven’t heard from coreclient or any of the people involved in the hendrix-montecastro filipino nurse murrieta church swindle that was such big news a year or so ago, local papers reported the FBI served search warrants on the big players homes in that case but I can’t find the names of those indicted to see if they were scooped up in the net.
-
AuthorPosts
