Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Don’t worry… over time the thread will get hijacked by
a) football conversation
b) political mudslinging
c) end of the world as we know it talk[/quote]Was that a request? I pick “a”, without further ado, allan, how bout your raiders over sdrealtors iggles, nice work? What do you think SD, the patsies look like they got it going on again, I’m almost o.k with denver taking tomorrow night and the division, it’s our only hope to end the norv tuner era and get “chucky” for next year.
This is now the second request this week to take on an exchange person, the other one was from my kids school to take a korean male teacher who will be teaching at my kids school (the two female teachers are already taken, so no moral dilemma there). I thought about that for a bit, I need a wingman and korea needs a little hedonism, he’s gonna hate my “donger needs food” t-shirt but other than that, it could work. I’ll sleep on it.
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Don’t worry… over time the thread will get hijacked by
a) football conversation
b) political mudslinging
c) end of the world as we know it talk[/quote]Was that a request? I pick “a”, without further ado, allan, how bout your raiders over sdrealtors iggles, nice work? What do you think SD, the patsies look like they got it going on again, I’m almost o.k with denver taking tomorrow night and the division, it’s our only hope to end the norv tuner era and get “chucky” for next year.
This is now the second request this week to take on an exchange person, the other one was from my kids school to take a korean male teacher who will be teaching at my kids school (the two female teachers are already taken, so no moral dilemma there). I thought about that for a bit, I need a wingman and korea needs a little hedonism, he’s gonna hate my “donger needs food” t-shirt but other than that, it could work. I’ll sleep on it.
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Don’t worry… over time the thread will get hijacked by
a) football conversation
b) political mudslinging
c) end of the world as we know it talk[/quote]Was that a request? I pick “a”, without further ado, allan, how bout your raiders over sdrealtors iggles, nice work? What do you think SD, the patsies look like they got it going on again, I’m almost o.k with denver taking tomorrow night and the division, it’s our only hope to end the norv tuner era and get “chucky” for next year.
This is now the second request this week to take on an exchange person, the other one was from my kids school to take a korean male teacher who will be teaching at my kids school (the two female teachers are already taken, so no moral dilemma there). I thought about that for a bit, I need a wingman and korea needs a little hedonism, he’s gonna hate my “donger needs food” t-shirt but other than that, it could work. I’ll sleep on it.
temeculaguy
ParticipantThen you are failing to see the math. It had a better rent multiplier and appreciated more during the bubble, it breaks from conventional wisdom but it’s true. It’s not about relocating here but needing to live here and wanting a particular type of housing that is in short supply in the immediate area. It’s also about looking to target a rental demographic, not a relocating purchasing demographic. When I rented in that development, most of my neighbors actually owned, most were young grandparents in their 50’s and 60’s who wanted to live by their kids and grandkids, there were also a chunk fo divorcees. I’m low 40’s so I felt a little young at cocktail parties, but they made great neighbors. With about 20k kids in the zip code and about 200 total housing units where you don’t have to do a lot of of landscape maintenence, it’s a niche that exists but is unfilled. About half had decent sized back yards, not too big, maybe 30×40 but certainly more than that a traditional condo courtyard, I rented one with a nice back lawn. The dog size restrictions of under 25 or 30 lbs made the ladies with their lap dogs happy, they could walk them within the gates adn not have to have leash wars with big dogs, in the early evening it was a lap dog parade.
And this might interest you paramount, far less criminal activity compared to small, older sfr tracts, so don’t hate cause it’s got the word “townhouse” in the name, trust the math, everything else is just opinion.
temeculaguy
ParticipantThen you are failing to see the math. It had a better rent multiplier and appreciated more during the bubble, it breaks from conventional wisdom but it’s true. It’s not about relocating here but needing to live here and wanting a particular type of housing that is in short supply in the immediate area. It’s also about looking to target a rental demographic, not a relocating purchasing demographic. When I rented in that development, most of my neighbors actually owned, most were young grandparents in their 50’s and 60’s who wanted to live by their kids and grandkids, there were also a chunk fo divorcees. I’m low 40’s so I felt a little young at cocktail parties, but they made great neighbors. With about 20k kids in the zip code and about 200 total housing units where you don’t have to do a lot of of landscape maintenence, it’s a niche that exists but is unfilled. About half had decent sized back yards, not too big, maybe 30×40 but certainly more than that a traditional condo courtyard, I rented one with a nice back lawn. The dog size restrictions of under 25 or 30 lbs made the ladies with their lap dogs happy, they could walk them within the gates adn not have to have leash wars with big dogs, in the early evening it was a lap dog parade.
And this might interest you paramount, far less criminal activity compared to small, older sfr tracts, so don’t hate cause it’s got the word “townhouse” in the name, trust the math, everything else is just opinion.
temeculaguy
ParticipantThen you are failing to see the math. It had a better rent multiplier and appreciated more during the bubble, it breaks from conventional wisdom but it’s true. It’s not about relocating here but needing to live here and wanting a particular type of housing that is in short supply in the immediate area. It’s also about looking to target a rental demographic, not a relocating purchasing demographic. When I rented in that development, most of my neighbors actually owned, most were young grandparents in their 50’s and 60’s who wanted to live by their kids and grandkids, there were also a chunk fo divorcees. I’m low 40’s so I felt a little young at cocktail parties, but they made great neighbors. With about 20k kids in the zip code and about 200 total housing units where you don’t have to do a lot of of landscape maintenence, it’s a niche that exists but is unfilled. About half had decent sized back yards, not too big, maybe 30×40 but certainly more than that a traditional condo courtyard, I rented one with a nice back lawn. The dog size restrictions of under 25 or 30 lbs made the ladies with their lap dogs happy, they could walk them within the gates adn not have to have leash wars with big dogs, in the early evening it was a lap dog parade.
And this might interest you paramount, far less criminal activity compared to small, older sfr tracts, so don’t hate cause it’s got the word “townhouse” in the name, trust the math, everything else is just opinion.
temeculaguy
ParticipantThen you are failing to see the math. It had a better rent multiplier and appreciated more during the bubble, it breaks from conventional wisdom but it’s true. It’s not about relocating here but needing to live here and wanting a particular type of housing that is in short supply in the immediate area. It’s also about looking to target a rental demographic, not a relocating purchasing demographic. When I rented in that development, most of my neighbors actually owned, most were young grandparents in their 50’s and 60’s who wanted to live by their kids and grandkids, there were also a chunk fo divorcees. I’m low 40’s so I felt a little young at cocktail parties, but they made great neighbors. With about 20k kids in the zip code and about 200 total housing units where you don’t have to do a lot of of landscape maintenence, it’s a niche that exists but is unfilled. About half had decent sized back yards, not too big, maybe 30×40 but certainly more than that a traditional condo courtyard, I rented one with a nice back lawn. The dog size restrictions of under 25 or 30 lbs made the ladies with their lap dogs happy, they could walk them within the gates adn not have to have leash wars with big dogs, in the early evening it was a lap dog parade.
And this might interest you paramount, far less criminal activity compared to small, older sfr tracts, so don’t hate cause it’s got the word “townhouse” in the name, trust the math, everything else is just opinion.
temeculaguy
ParticipantThen you are failing to see the math. It had a better rent multiplier and appreciated more during the bubble, it breaks from conventional wisdom but it’s true. It’s not about relocating here but needing to live here and wanting a particular type of housing that is in short supply in the immediate area. It’s also about looking to target a rental demographic, not a relocating purchasing demographic. When I rented in that development, most of my neighbors actually owned, most were young grandparents in their 50’s and 60’s who wanted to live by their kids and grandkids, there were also a chunk fo divorcees. I’m low 40’s so I felt a little young at cocktail parties, but they made great neighbors. With about 20k kids in the zip code and about 200 total housing units where you don’t have to do a lot of of landscape maintenence, it’s a niche that exists but is unfilled. About half had decent sized back yards, not too big, maybe 30×40 but certainly more than that a traditional condo courtyard, I rented one with a nice back lawn. The dog size restrictions of under 25 or 30 lbs made the ladies with their lap dogs happy, they could walk them within the gates adn not have to have leash wars with big dogs, in the early evening it was a lap dog parade.
And this might interest you paramount, far less criminal activity compared to small, older sfr tracts, so don’t hate cause it’s got the word “townhouse” in the name, trust the math, everything else is just opinion.
temeculaguy
ParticipantRich, the tin foil hat crowd isn’t gonna like what you just did. You just redirected the focus to understanding the market dynamics as if the market is mindless and if all the data were available, somewhat accurate predictions could be made.
It’s more fun for them to imagine a room full of fat old bankers conspiring to screw the little guy, to control prices, to keep them from making accurate predictions. Once they are awakened to the secrets of the powers that be, they can outsmart them.
Placing emphasis on supply and demand instead of conspiracy, the “sexy” just goes away.
On a serious note, the ups and downs of the distressed pipeline do happen, but the capacity of the system to process those properties takes the gyrations out of it and the inventory is delivered at a measured pace. I don’t think the system has the ability to flood anything, a steady stream is about all they can provide and that doesn’t cause huge fluxuations in prices unless the buyers stop. It’s the only conclusion I can come to as to why the holders of distressed properties wouldn’t have tried to get everything out on the market while it’s being snapped up in hours and while rates are low, who knows how long this little “short term sellers market within a longer term buyers market” will last.
temeculaguy
ParticipantRich, the tin foil hat crowd isn’t gonna like what you just did. You just redirected the focus to understanding the market dynamics as if the market is mindless and if all the data were available, somewhat accurate predictions could be made.
It’s more fun for them to imagine a room full of fat old bankers conspiring to screw the little guy, to control prices, to keep them from making accurate predictions. Once they are awakened to the secrets of the powers that be, they can outsmart them.
Placing emphasis on supply and demand instead of conspiracy, the “sexy” just goes away.
On a serious note, the ups and downs of the distressed pipeline do happen, but the capacity of the system to process those properties takes the gyrations out of it and the inventory is delivered at a measured pace. I don’t think the system has the ability to flood anything, a steady stream is about all they can provide and that doesn’t cause huge fluxuations in prices unless the buyers stop. It’s the only conclusion I can come to as to why the holders of distressed properties wouldn’t have tried to get everything out on the market while it’s being snapped up in hours and while rates are low, who knows how long this little “short term sellers market within a longer term buyers market” will last.
temeculaguy
ParticipantRich, the tin foil hat crowd isn’t gonna like what you just did. You just redirected the focus to understanding the market dynamics as if the market is mindless and if all the data were available, somewhat accurate predictions could be made.
It’s more fun for them to imagine a room full of fat old bankers conspiring to screw the little guy, to control prices, to keep them from making accurate predictions. Once they are awakened to the secrets of the powers that be, they can outsmart them.
Placing emphasis on supply and demand instead of conspiracy, the “sexy” just goes away.
On a serious note, the ups and downs of the distressed pipeline do happen, but the capacity of the system to process those properties takes the gyrations out of it and the inventory is delivered at a measured pace. I don’t think the system has the ability to flood anything, a steady stream is about all they can provide and that doesn’t cause huge fluxuations in prices unless the buyers stop. It’s the only conclusion I can come to as to why the holders of distressed properties wouldn’t have tried to get everything out on the market while it’s being snapped up in hours and while rates are low, who knows how long this little “short term sellers market within a longer term buyers market” will last.
temeculaguy
ParticipantRich, the tin foil hat crowd isn’t gonna like what you just did. You just redirected the focus to understanding the market dynamics as if the market is mindless and if all the data were available, somewhat accurate predictions could be made.
It’s more fun for them to imagine a room full of fat old bankers conspiring to screw the little guy, to control prices, to keep them from making accurate predictions. Once they are awakened to the secrets of the powers that be, they can outsmart them.
Placing emphasis on supply and demand instead of conspiracy, the “sexy” just goes away.
On a serious note, the ups and downs of the distressed pipeline do happen, but the capacity of the system to process those properties takes the gyrations out of it and the inventory is delivered at a measured pace. I don’t think the system has the ability to flood anything, a steady stream is about all they can provide and that doesn’t cause huge fluxuations in prices unless the buyers stop. It’s the only conclusion I can come to as to why the holders of distressed properties wouldn’t have tried to get everything out on the market while it’s being snapped up in hours and while rates are low, who knows how long this little “short term sellers market within a longer term buyers market” will last.
temeculaguy
ParticipantRich, the tin foil hat crowd isn’t gonna like what you just did. You just redirected the focus to understanding the market dynamics as if the market is mindless and if all the data were available, somewhat accurate predictions could be made.
It’s more fun for them to imagine a room full of fat old bankers conspiring to screw the little guy, to control prices, to keep them from making accurate predictions. Once they are awakened to the secrets of the powers that be, they can outsmart them.
Placing emphasis on supply and demand instead of conspiracy, the “sexy” just goes away.
On a serious note, the ups and downs of the distressed pipeline do happen, but the capacity of the system to process those properties takes the gyrations out of it and the inventory is delivered at a measured pace. I don’t think the system has the ability to flood anything, a steady stream is about all they can provide and that doesn’t cause huge fluxuations in prices unless the buyers stop. It’s the only conclusion I can come to as to why the holders of distressed properties wouldn’t have tried to get everything out on the market while it’s being snapped up in hours and while rates are low, who knows how long this little “short term sellers market within a longer term buyers market” will last.
temeculaguy
ParticipantI’m conflicted because I haven’t acted on it and there is already too much competition, prices have jumped and inventory is low. I agree with Ren on a couple of points, especially the 1400-1700 townhouses with 2 car garages, the problem is that there are only about three in town and only in 92592. I would stay in 92592, it has the fewest rentals, there is only one apartment building in the Temecula parkway corridor and even now, while we are in the worst economic times in decades, the rental market in the South is tight. The casino employs a few thousand people who fit the rental demographic and there are limited rentals available without getting ont the freeway, once they are on the freeway, they have lots of choices. For S.D. commuters, the south is preferable as the freeway jams up going north, getting progressively worse, not that renters are commuters, but for appreciation, ppsf, etc (customs, land and other variables not included), prices go down as you travel north.
Personally, sfr’s are not the way to go up here, the rent multiplier isn’t as good and the taxes are higher. It’s not mello roos, but voter approved bond things and community assessment districts. The way they assess, sfr’s get more bite, the school tax costs each sfr lot $600 a year and each multi something like $200, there are a bunch of little add ons like that, driving the taxes for an sfr lot up a fixed dolar amount above the 1% tax rate between $100 and $300 per month, not based on value, while the townhouses/condo pretty much escape with $50 a month, so an hoa almost gets wiped out by the tax differential.
It’s hard to determine from redfin and last years taxes because they lowered them mid year, when they sell they get mid year adjustments, but the assesor web site will show the exact bill and what’s in it.The older 1000-1400 sq ft sfr’s rent for the same as 1500 or 1600 sq ft condo, has the same carry cost when you add in a gardner and water (which landlords must pay up here) but they won’t appreciate as much. The sfr’s are holding their value on the low side but don’t rise as much in the bubble.
A 3/2 1600 sq ft 2 car attached garage townhouse rents for 1500 in a heartbeat and sells for 140k, it’s bubble price was 375k and it’s prebubble 2002 price was about 200k, they are just getting beat up more because of sterotypes. A 3/2 vail ranch 1300 sq fter, rents for 1500, had a bubble price of about 350k and they killing each other to get them for 160k right now.
The demographics of the renter for that little, older place is actually much more problematic than the townhouse, especially the no hoa places, where you can have 6 cars and pack em in, or park your monster trucks and play you music loud. The upscale condos mostly have 40-60 year old without little kids, many living alone, the one I’m looking at is clean and the hoa is is finacially secure. I think ren already owns one, unfortunately none are listed right now that aren’t shorts with offers. If I say anymore, I’ll never get mine. I’m actually losing faith that I will because there the shadow inventory there already cam out of the shadows, almost all the ones bought between 2004 and 2007 have already been turned over. Alright, here’s the ones I like, who cares, it’s gonna be a while before I do anything, I might wait another year.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/33618-Emerson-Way-92592/unit-A/home/12509138
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/41315-Ashton-Cir-92592/unit-C/home/12264525
This third one is a classic low end sfr in the same price range, it’s peak price was a 100k less, it rents for about the same, probably a little less and they look like crap. The demographics are worse.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/44881-Potestas-Dr-92592/home/6246851
I think the reason why it’s different is that there are so few condos, I do not like the numbers of the dr horton ones near pechanga parkway, they are way overpriced and too small. The temecula creek little ones are 100k, they pencil well, broke 300k in the bubble, i like em, but not as mych as the townhouses.
-
AuthorPosts
