Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
pepsi
ParticipantAN, I think you are lucky that you are not sick enough to drop out of workforce.
Once you are very sick (like having cancer) for over 6 months, would you still have the insurance that you think is “affordable” ?I don’t know why we are comparing US and Canada (2nd worst in the world) ? Why not compare it with Japan or Taiwan ?
ParticipantAN, I think you are lucky that you are not sick enough to drop out of workforce.
Once you are very sick (like having cancer) for over 6 months, would you still have the insurance that you think is “affordable” ?I don’t know why we are comparing US and Canada (2nd worst in the world) ? Why not compare it with Japan or Taiwan ?
ParticipantAN, I think you are lucky that you are not sick enough to drop out of workforce.
Once you are very sick (like having cancer) for over 6 months, would you still have the insurance that you think is “affordable” ?I don’t know why we are comparing US and Canada (2nd worst in the world) ? Why not compare it with Japan or Taiwan ?
ParticipantAN, I think you are lucky that you are not sick enough to drop out of workforce.
Once you are very sick (like having cancer) for over 6 months, would you still have the insurance that you think is “affordable” ?I don’t know why we are comparing US and Canada (2nd worst in the world) ? Why not compare it with Japan or Taiwan ?
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I was listening Dennis Prager interview a doctor. To shorten what the doc said; You are more likely to lose your savings here in the USA and more likely to die from a major illness in the more socialized systems.
I asked a nurse practitioner if she agreed with that assessment and she said yes.
Any docs here in the house? Do you agree or disagree?
[/quote]
I would agree to this one:
You are likely to lose your saving (first) in USA , and to die (first) from a major illness in other system.
Participant[quote=patb]
Dean Janis, a Southern California lawyer who bought a $950,000 home in 2004, will see his interest-only loan reset in December. He calculates that will send his payments up a minimum of 27 percent, to $3,726. A rise in rates could eventually push it as high as $6,700.
[/quote]$6700 for a lawyer ? that is 30 hours of work.
Come on, just pay off your debt.Participant[quote=patb]
Dean Janis, a Southern California lawyer who bought a $950,000 home in 2004, will see his interest-only loan reset in December. He calculates that will send his payments up a minimum of 27 percent, to $3,726. A rise in rates could eventually push it as high as $6,700.
[/quote]$6700 for a lawyer ? that is 30 hours of work.
Come on, just pay off your debt.Participant[quote=patb]
Dean Janis, a Southern California lawyer who bought a $950,000 home in 2004, will see his interest-only loan reset in December. He calculates that will send his payments up a minimum of 27 percent, to $3,726. A rise in rates could eventually push it as high as $6,700.
[/quote]$6700 for a lawyer ? that is 30 hours of work.
Come on, just pay off your debt.Participant[quote=patb]
Dean Janis, a Southern California lawyer who bought a $950,000 home in 2004, will see his interest-only loan reset in December. He calculates that will send his payments up a minimum of 27 percent, to $3,726. A rise in rates could eventually push it as high as $6,700.
[/quote]$6700 for a lawyer ? that is 30 hours of work.
Come on, just pay off your debt.Participant[quote=patb]
Dean Janis, a Southern California lawyer who bought a $950,000 home in 2004, will see his interest-only loan reset in December. He calculates that will send his payments up a minimum of 27 percent, to $3,726. A rise in rates could eventually push it as high as $6,700.
[/quote]$6700 for a lawyer ? that is 30 hours of work.
Come on, just pay off your debt. -
AuthorPosts