[NotCranky]

Esmith,
Interesting. The target seems reasonable enough to me.

“The big time trouble is, the market will probably undershoot that level; perhaps by a substantial . Longer term buyer won’t then worry so much though for they can wait for the knife to bounce!”

At least some areas are going to overshoot the target esmith has proposed even if we don’t have an extreme recession. That is already self evident.
I think there are some areas from the middle tier,for instance Poway’s housing stock that meets middle tier criteria and perhaps most “Fortress” zones that will not overshoot or not by so much, dependent on the economic resiliency or lack of in San diego going forward.

[NotCranky]

Nice graphs and map esmith.
From your second graph on the link…are you interpreting the picture that you paint there to mean that lower and middle tiers are about to overshoot what you consider a reasonable target, given current interest rate environment?
Thanks

[NotCranky]

Nice graphs and map esmith.
From your second graph on the link…are you interpreting the picture that you paint there to mean that lower and middle tiers are about to overshoot what you consider a reasonable target, given current interest rate environment?
Thanks

[NotCranky]

Nice graphs and map esmith.
From your second graph on the link…are you interpreting the picture that you paint there to mean that lower and middle tiers are about to overshoot what you consider a reasonable target, given current interest rate environment?
Thanks

[NotCranky]

Nice graphs and map esmith.
From your second graph on the link…are you interpreting the picture that you paint there to mean that lower and middle tiers are about to overshoot what you consider a reasonable target, given current interest rate environment?
Thanks

[NotCranky]

Nice graphs and map esmith.
From your second graph on the link…are you interpreting the picture that you paint there to mean that lower and middle tiers are about to overshoot what you consider a reasonable target, given current interest rate environment?
Thanks

[NotCranky]

“It’s ironic that I started this post by bashing people for clinging to fantasies and finished it by suggesting that we can tap into a free source of electricity – oh well, it isn’t easy being a wacko nutjob!”

That was really good actually.

I thought to myself, who needs breakfast after reading such edifying stuff?Then it occurred to me a bowl of “wacko nutjob cereal” would be great to go with it. Maybe you could make your own cereal and put that post on you first edition “wacko cereal” box? ” “Stimulates Nerd Fantasys” “Piggingtonians Eat It Too!” “Free Tin Foil Hat in Every Box!”

[NotCranky]

“It’s ironic that I started this post by bashing people for clinging to fantasies and finished it by suggesting that we can tap into a free source of electricity – oh well, it isn’t easy being a wacko nutjob!”

That was really good actually.

I thought to myself, who needs breakfast after reading such edifying stuff?Then it occurred to me a bowl of “wacko nutjob cereal” would be great to go with it. Maybe you could make your own cereal and put that post on you first edition “wacko cereal” box? ” “Stimulates Nerd Fantasys” “Piggingtonians Eat It Too!” “Free Tin Foil Hat in Every Box!”

[NotCranky]

“It’s ironic that I started this post by bashing people for clinging to fantasies and finished it by suggesting that we can tap into a free source of electricity – oh well, it isn’t easy being a wacko nutjob!”

That was really good actually.

I thought to myself, who needs breakfast after reading such edifying stuff?Then it occurred to me a bowl of “wacko nutjob cereal” would be great to go with it. Maybe you could make your own cereal and put that post on you first edition “wacko cereal” box? ” “Stimulates Nerd Fantasys” “Piggingtonians Eat It Too!” “Free Tin Foil Hat in Every Box!”

[NotCranky]

“It’s ironic that I started this post by bashing people for clinging to fantasies and finished it by suggesting that we can tap into a free source of electricity – oh well, it isn’t easy being a wacko nutjob!”

That was really good actually.

I thought to myself, who needs breakfast after reading such edifying stuff?Then it occurred to me a bowl of “wacko nutjob cereal” would be great to go with it. Maybe you could make your own cereal and put that post on you first edition “wacko cereal” box? ” “Stimulates Nerd Fantasys” “Piggingtonians Eat It Too!” “Free Tin Foil Hat in Every Box!”

[NotCranky]

“It’s ironic that I started this post by bashing people for clinging to fantasies and finished it by suggesting that we can tap into a free source of electricity – oh well, it isn’t easy being a wacko nutjob!”

That was really good actually.

I thought to myself, who needs breakfast after reading such edifying stuff?Then it occurred to me a bowl of “wacko nutjob cereal” would be great to go with it. Maybe you could make your own cereal and put that post on you first edition “wacko cereal” box? ” “Stimulates Nerd Fantasys” “Piggingtonians Eat It Too!” “Free Tin Foil Hat in Every Box!”

[NotCranky]

I am not sure about the permits, but I believe they trickled in for the last fire.

the insurance company does not comp the house out they “adjust it” using a pet hired contractor who use software. The Homeowner can wait for the insurance companies offer and let their contractor repair the house or they can argue the numbers indepentdently or hirer an adjuster to scope out and estimate the loss. If an agreement can’t be reached they go to a neutral third party called a referee in an arbitration process called “appraisal” and the referee makes the decision. This is all under state law.

The terms of the policy absolutely affect the results. In the last fires the insurance commissioner and the courts took the side of the under insured and blamed the coverage deficiency on insurance on the agent. I know several companies under insure to keep rates competitive and deal with it on a case by case basis in big losses. They usually have pretty high extended coverage by implementing a rider into the contract but the insured could likely end up fighting like crazy to get into the extended coverage area.

[NotCranky]

I am not sure about the permits, but I believe they trickled in for the last fire.

the insurance company does not comp the house out they “adjust it” using a pet hired contractor who use software. The Homeowner can wait for the insurance companies offer and let their contractor repair the house or they can argue the numbers indepentdently or hirer an adjuster to scope out and estimate the loss. If an agreement can’t be reached they go to a neutral third party called a referee in an arbitration process called “appraisal” and the referee makes the decision. This is all under state law.

The terms of the policy absolutely affect the results. In the last fires the insurance commissioner and the courts took the side of the under insured and blamed the coverage deficiency on insurance on the agent. I know several companies under insure to keep rates competitive and deal with it on a case by case basis in big losses. They usually have pretty high extended coverage by implementing a rider into the contract but the insured could likely end up fighting like crazy to get into the extended coverage area.

[NotCranky]

I am not sure about the permits, but I believe they trickled in for the last fire.

the insurance company does not comp the house out they “adjust it” using a pet hired contractor who use software. The Homeowner can wait for the insurance companies offer and let their contractor repair the house or they can argue the numbers indepentdently or hirer an adjuster to scope out and estimate the loss. If an agreement can’t be reached they go to a neutral third party called a referee in an arbitration process called “appraisal” and the referee makes the decision. This is all under state law.

The terms of the policy absolutely affect the results. In the last fires the insurance commissioner and the courts took the side of the under insured and blamed the coverage deficiency on insurance on the agent. I know several companies under insure to keep rates competitive and deal with it on a case by case basis in big losses. They usually have pretty high extended coverage by implementing a rider into the contract but the insured could likely end up fighting like crazy to get into the extended coverage area.

[NotCranky]

I am not sure about the permits, but I believe they trickled in for the last fire.

the insurance company does not comp the house out they “adjust it” using a pet hired contractor who use software. The Homeowner can wait for the insurance companies offer and let their contractor repair the house or they can argue the numbers indepentdently or hirer an adjuster to scope out and estimate the loss. If an agreement can’t be reached they go to a neutral third party called a referee in an arbitration process called “appraisal” and the referee makes the decision. This is all under state law.

The terms of the policy absolutely affect the results. In the last fires the insurance commissioner and the courts took the side of the under insured and blamed the coverage deficiency on insurance on the agent. I know several companies under insure to keep rates competitive and deal with it on a case by case basis in big losses. They usually have pretty high extended coverage by implementing a rider into the contract but the insured could likely end up fighting like crazy to get into the extended coverage area.

[Author]

Posts