Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
JPJonesParticipantAll of Palin’s answers were canned and lacked any substance. It was sad, really. At the very least, some of the analysis of her debate strategy was worth a good laugh:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/3/43222/8057/718/618653
JPJonesParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Bad parenting?
JPJones, if you are hoping a kindergarten sex ed class will protect your three year old son from the bad people of the world you need to wake up.
A kindergarten sex ed class will NOT adequately prepare him or her to defend against sexual predators. THAT IS YOUR JOB!!! YOU MUST NEVER ALLOW YOUR KINDERGARTEN AGE CHILD TO BE IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY BECOME THE TARGET OF A SEXUAL ADVANCE.
What is wrong with you people?
Please, be a good parent. Take responsibility for your kids and don’t think the government is going to protect them for you. The government can not do that, no matter how hard they try.[/quote]
You’re absolutely right. It is my responsibility to protect and help reinforce the education my child gets. I wasn’t saying that the material in question is the end-all be-all that is going to keep my kid safe. You’re making assumptions about my view of parenting that are grossly inaccurate.JPJonesParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Bad parenting?
JPJones, if you are hoping a kindergarten sex ed class will protect your three year old son from the bad people of the world you need to wake up.
A kindergarten sex ed class will NOT adequately prepare him or her to defend against sexual predators. THAT IS YOUR JOB!!! YOU MUST NEVER ALLOW YOUR KINDERGARTEN AGE CHILD TO BE IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY BECOME THE TARGET OF A SEXUAL ADVANCE.
What is wrong with you people?
Please, be a good parent. Take responsibility for your kids and don’t think the government is going to protect them for you. The government can not do that, no matter how hard they try.[/quote]
You’re absolutely right. It is my responsibility to protect and help reinforce the education my child gets. I wasn’t saying that the material in question is the end-all be-all that is going to keep my kid safe. You’re making assumptions about my view of parenting that are grossly inaccurate.JPJonesParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Bad parenting?
JPJones, if you are hoping a kindergarten sex ed class will protect your three year old son from the bad people of the world you need to wake up.
A kindergarten sex ed class will NOT adequately prepare him or her to defend against sexual predators. THAT IS YOUR JOB!!! YOU MUST NEVER ALLOW YOUR KINDERGARTEN AGE CHILD TO BE IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY BECOME THE TARGET OF A SEXUAL ADVANCE.
What is wrong with you people?
Please, be a good parent. Take responsibility for your kids and don’t think the government is going to protect them for you. The government can not do that, no matter how hard they try.[/quote]
You’re absolutely right. It is my responsibility to protect and help reinforce the education my child gets. I wasn’t saying that the material in question is the end-all be-all that is going to keep my kid safe. You’re making assumptions about my view of parenting that are grossly inaccurate.JPJonesParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Bad parenting?
JPJones, if you are hoping a kindergarten sex ed class will protect your three year old son from the bad people of the world you need to wake up.
A kindergarten sex ed class will NOT adequately prepare him or her to defend against sexual predators. THAT IS YOUR JOB!!! YOU MUST NEVER ALLOW YOUR KINDERGARTEN AGE CHILD TO BE IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY BECOME THE TARGET OF A SEXUAL ADVANCE.
What is wrong with you people?
Please, be a good parent. Take responsibility for your kids and don’t think the government is going to protect them for you. The government can not do that, no matter how hard they try.[/quote]
You’re absolutely right. It is my responsibility to protect and help reinforce the education my child gets. I wasn’t saying that the material in question is the end-all be-all that is going to keep my kid safe. You’re making assumptions about my view of parenting that are grossly inaccurate.JPJonesParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Bad parenting?
JPJones, if you are hoping a kindergarten sex ed class will protect your three year old son from the bad people of the world you need to wake up.
A kindergarten sex ed class will NOT adequately prepare him or her to defend against sexual predators. THAT IS YOUR JOB!!! YOU MUST NEVER ALLOW YOUR KINDERGARTEN AGE CHILD TO BE IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY BECOME THE TARGET OF A SEXUAL ADVANCE.
What is wrong with you people?
Please, be a good parent. Take responsibility for your kids and don’t think the government is going to protect them for you. The government can not do that, no matter how hard they try.[/quote]
You’re absolutely right. It is my responsibility to protect and help reinforce the education my child gets. I wasn’t saying that the material in question is the end-all be-all that is going to keep my kid safe. You’re making assumptions about my view of parenting that are grossly inaccurate.JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
JPJonesParticipantThe “age appropriate” “sex ed” is intended to teach children how to defend themselves against sexual predators, not how to do the ol’ in-out. Slapping a blanket label on the whole subject doesn’t work.
As to your comment on Obama’s wife speaking to their daughters about same-sex marriage, I think it would be pretty far-fetched to assume that the discussion was about the mechanics of the situation.
JPJonesParticipantThe “age appropriate” “sex ed” is intended to teach children how to defend themselves against sexual predators, not how to do the ol’ in-out. Slapping a blanket label on the whole subject doesn’t work.
As to your comment on Obama’s wife speaking to their daughters about same-sex marriage, I think it would be pretty far-fetched to assume that the discussion was about the mechanics of the situation.
JPJonesParticipantThe “age appropriate” “sex ed” is intended to teach children how to defend themselves against sexual predators, not how to do the ol’ in-out. Slapping a blanket label on the whole subject doesn’t work.
As to your comment on Obama’s wife speaking to their daughters about same-sex marriage, I think it would be pretty far-fetched to assume that the discussion was about the mechanics of the situation.
-
AuthorPosts
