Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Eugene
ParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
December 28, 2007 at 5:49 PM in reply to: 2005-2007 price comparison for Mira Mesa and Chula Vista #125895Participant12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000
December 28, 2007 at 5:49 PM in reply to: 2005-2007 price comparison for Mira Mesa and Chula Vista #126049Participant12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000
December 28, 2007 at 5:49 PM in reply to: 2005-2007 price comparison for Mira Mesa and Chula Vista #126065Participant12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000
December 28, 2007 at 5:49 PM in reply to: 2005-2007 price comparison for Mira Mesa and Chula Vista #126127Participant12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000
December 28, 2007 at 5:49 PM in reply to: 2005-2007 price comparison for Mira Mesa and Chula Vista #126155Participant12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000
ParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kDecember 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM in reply to: California to end the mortgage interest deduction? #125028ParticipantI understand this as making mortgage interest non-deductible as far as state tax is concerned. California can’t possibly eliminate federal interest deduction, it’s out of their jurisdiction.
December 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM in reply to: California to end the mortgage interest deduction? #125179ParticipantI understand this as making mortgage interest non-deductible as far as state tax is concerned. California can’t possibly eliminate federal interest deduction, it’s out of their jurisdiction.
December 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM in reply to: California to end the mortgage interest deduction? #125198ParticipantI understand this as making mortgage interest non-deductible as far as state tax is concerned. California can’t possibly eliminate federal interest deduction, it’s out of their jurisdiction.
-
AuthorPosts
