2005-2007 price comparison for Mira Mesa and Chula Vista

[VoZangre]

We are to Understand…

“One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.”

That condos are getting super-slammed, vraiment?

Voz

[jimmyle]

Wow, the change in inventory is incredible.

Yeah, condos depreciation is even worst but I think most people are more interested in houses. Here is data for Scripps Ranch which isn’t much better than Mira Mesa.[img_assist|nid=5988|title=scripps ranch|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=238]

[jimmyle]

Wow, the change in inventory is incredible.

Yeah, condos depreciation is even worst but I think most people are more interested in houses. Here is data for Scripps Ranch which isn’t much better than Mira Mesa.[img_assist|nid=5988|title=scripps ranch|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=238]

[jimmyle]

Wow, the change in inventory is incredible.

Yeah, condos depreciation is even worst but I think most people are more interested in houses. Here is data for Scripps Ranch which isn’t much better than Mira Mesa.[img_assist|nid=5988|title=scripps ranch|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=238]

[jimmyle]

Wow, the change in inventory is incredible.

Yeah, condos depreciation is even worst but I think most people are more interested in houses. Here is data for Scripps Ranch which isn’t much better than Mira Mesa.[img_assist|nid=5988|title=scripps ranch|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=238]

[jimmyle]

Wow, the change in inventory is incredible.

Yeah, condos depreciation is even worst but I think most people are more interested in houses. Here is data for Scripps Ranch which isn’t much better than Mira Mesa.[img_assist|nid=5988|title=scripps ranch|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=238]

[Eugene]

12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000

[Eugene]

12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000

[Eugene]

12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000

[Eugene]

12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000

[Eugene]

12837 Starwood Lane was purchased 03/02/2005 for $1,016,000, seems to be in escrow @ $850,000

[DWCAP]

Voz,

It wasnt that I wanted to lump condos and houses together, it was that I didnt want to do the work to seperate them and then try to gage sales. I do think condos, especially in the high inventory areas, are a gonner.
Jimmyle, I also agree that most people are looking a houses. However, I also think that if condo’s get low enough, it will drag down house prices as well.

[DWCAP]

Voz,

It wasnt that I wanted to lump condos and houses together, it was that I didnt want to do the work to seperate them and then try to gage sales. I do think condos, especially in the high inventory areas, are a gonner.
Jimmyle, I also agree that most people are looking a houses. However, I also think that if condo’s get low enough, it will drag down house prices as well.

[DWCAP]

Voz,

It wasnt that I wanted to lump condos and houses together, it was that I didnt want to do the work to seperate them and then try to gage sales. I do think condos, especially in the high inventory areas, are a gonner.
Jimmyle, I also agree that most people are looking a houses. However, I also think that if condo’s get low enough, it will drag down house prices as well.

[DWCAP]

Voz,

It wasnt that I wanted to lump condos and houses together, it was that I didnt want to do the work to seperate them and then try to gage sales. I do think condos, especially in the high inventory areas, are a gonner.
Jimmyle, I also agree that most people are looking a houses. However, I also think that if condo’s get low enough, it will drag down house prices as well.

[Author]

Posts