- This topic has 45 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 28, 2007 at 3:14 PM #126058December 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM #125805SD RealtorParticipant
Good job Jimmy.
I have a client who is buying a foreclosure in Arbor Ridge on Dabney for 230k that went for 350k two years ago.
SD Realtor
December 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM #125958SD RealtorParticipantGood job Jimmy.
I have a client who is buying a foreclosure in Arbor Ridge on Dabney for 230k that went for 350k two years ago.
SD Realtor
December 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM #125975SD RealtorParticipantGood job Jimmy.
I have a client who is buying a foreclosure in Arbor Ridge on Dabney for 230k that went for 350k two years ago.
SD Realtor
December 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM #126037SD RealtorParticipantGood job Jimmy.
I have a client who is buying a foreclosure in Arbor Ridge on Dabney for 230k that went for 350k two years ago.
SD Realtor
December 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM #126063SD RealtorParticipantGood job Jimmy.
I have a client who is buying a foreclosure in Arbor Ridge on Dabney for 230k that went for 350k two years ago.
SD Realtor
December 28, 2007 at 4:06 PM #125835DWCAPParticipantHey Jimmyle,
Really interesting. Fun facts to spead when someone says housing never goes down, or if it does, it will only be by a few percent.
Ok, to add alittle of my own information. It isnt as good as yours, but considering I am sick in bed and bored out of my mind, please forgive.
I have been noticing that alot of the price reductions are local. This is obvious on the break down of the case shiller index into high, medium and low catagories. I decided to think of a few traditional middle class/lower middle class neighborhoods that would correspond to “median” income buyer, and see what was happening with sales. (I know this has been done a few times, but I wanted to do it myself.) I left out the really nice areas, and the inner city ghetto areas, mostly because I dont want to do the work.
Ok, first the problems I have identified, then the data. I dont have all the tools available to some on this board, so I just limited myself to was was available on Signonsandiego.com homesearch. They have sales data available going back years, and a nice easy number of total sales available today in a certain zipcode/area. I used Nov. 07, and Nov. 05 as comparisons since those are the years you chose in this thread, correspond ok to peaks, and are the latest data available to me (Nov.07) There was the problem of the fact that I am comparing today’s inventory with Novembers sales. However I tried to go back and use the first week of November inventory as listed on the SDlookup page for each. However, the numbers were not too different and some were higher and some lower, so I just stuck with one source.
Here is what I got.Area Nov 05 Nov 07 %change Dec 07 Months
sales sales sales inventory inventory
MiraM. 78 30 -61.5 314 10.5
ChuVista 379 169 -55.4 1995 11.8
Esco 167 94 -43.8 1648 17.5
Poway 48 24 -50.0 239 10.0
Clarmt 37 46 +24.3 180 3.9
LindaV. 27 30 +11.1 126 4.2
Oside 241 128 -46.9 1478 11.6
RB 177 154 -13.0 718 4.7Considering that 4-6 months is traditionally considered a healthy market, this is a really mixed bag. December is usually a slow month, with low inventory and sales. The fact that Escondido (92025,6,7,9) has 17+ months on the market, in DECEMBER, spells price drops to me. But Clairmont(92117), has a very healthy market according to these numbers and sales were picking up, not going down. Since overall sales are still falling, and inventory, especially when gaged by one month in winter, is still high in alot of SD, there is no real bottom to be seen yet.
One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.December 28, 2007 at 4:06 PM #125988DWCAPParticipantHey Jimmyle,
Really interesting. Fun facts to spead when someone says housing never goes down, or if it does, it will only be by a few percent.
Ok, to add alittle of my own information. It isnt as good as yours, but considering I am sick in bed and bored out of my mind, please forgive.
I have been noticing that alot of the price reductions are local. This is obvious on the break down of the case shiller index into high, medium and low catagories. I decided to think of a few traditional middle class/lower middle class neighborhoods that would correspond to “median” income buyer, and see what was happening with sales. (I know this has been done a few times, but I wanted to do it myself.) I left out the really nice areas, and the inner city ghetto areas, mostly because I dont want to do the work.
Ok, first the problems I have identified, then the data. I dont have all the tools available to some on this board, so I just limited myself to was was available on Signonsandiego.com homesearch. They have sales data available going back years, and a nice easy number of total sales available today in a certain zipcode/area. I used Nov. 07, and Nov. 05 as comparisons since those are the years you chose in this thread, correspond ok to peaks, and are the latest data available to me (Nov.07) There was the problem of the fact that I am comparing today’s inventory with Novembers sales. However I tried to go back and use the first week of November inventory as listed on the SDlookup page for each. However, the numbers were not too different and some were higher and some lower, so I just stuck with one source.
Here is what I got.Area Nov 05 Nov 07 %change Dec 07 Months
sales sales sales inventory inventory
MiraM. 78 30 -61.5 314 10.5
ChuVista 379 169 -55.4 1995 11.8
Esco 167 94 -43.8 1648 17.5
Poway 48 24 -50.0 239 10.0
Clarmt 37 46 +24.3 180 3.9
LindaV. 27 30 +11.1 126 4.2
Oside 241 128 -46.9 1478 11.6
RB 177 154 -13.0 718 4.7Considering that 4-6 months is traditionally considered a healthy market, this is a really mixed bag. December is usually a slow month, with low inventory and sales. The fact that Escondido (92025,6,7,9) has 17+ months on the market, in DECEMBER, spells price drops to me. But Clairmont(92117), has a very healthy market according to these numbers and sales were picking up, not going down. Since overall sales are still falling, and inventory, especially when gaged by one month in winter, is still high in alot of SD, there is no real bottom to be seen yet.
One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.December 28, 2007 at 4:06 PM #126006DWCAPParticipantHey Jimmyle,
Really interesting. Fun facts to spead when someone says housing never goes down, or if it does, it will only be by a few percent.
Ok, to add alittle of my own information. It isnt as good as yours, but considering I am sick in bed and bored out of my mind, please forgive.
I have been noticing that alot of the price reductions are local. This is obvious on the break down of the case shiller index into high, medium and low catagories. I decided to think of a few traditional middle class/lower middle class neighborhoods that would correspond to “median” income buyer, and see what was happening with sales. (I know this has been done a few times, but I wanted to do it myself.) I left out the really nice areas, and the inner city ghetto areas, mostly because I dont want to do the work.
Ok, first the problems I have identified, then the data. I dont have all the tools available to some on this board, so I just limited myself to was was available on Signonsandiego.com homesearch. They have sales data available going back years, and a nice easy number of total sales available today in a certain zipcode/area. I used Nov. 07, and Nov. 05 as comparisons since those are the years you chose in this thread, correspond ok to peaks, and are the latest data available to me (Nov.07) There was the problem of the fact that I am comparing today’s inventory with Novembers sales. However I tried to go back and use the first week of November inventory as listed on the SDlookup page for each. However, the numbers were not too different and some were higher and some lower, so I just stuck with one source.
Here is what I got.Area Nov 05 Nov 07 %change Dec 07 Months
sales sales sales inventory inventory
MiraM. 78 30 -61.5 314 10.5
ChuVista 379 169 -55.4 1995 11.8
Esco 167 94 -43.8 1648 17.5
Poway 48 24 -50.0 239 10.0
Clarmt 37 46 +24.3 180 3.9
LindaV. 27 30 +11.1 126 4.2
Oside 241 128 -46.9 1478 11.6
RB 177 154 -13.0 718 4.7Considering that 4-6 months is traditionally considered a healthy market, this is a really mixed bag. December is usually a slow month, with low inventory and sales. The fact that Escondido (92025,6,7,9) has 17+ months on the market, in DECEMBER, spells price drops to me. But Clairmont(92117), has a very healthy market according to these numbers and sales were picking up, not going down. Since overall sales are still falling, and inventory, especially when gaged by one month in winter, is still high in alot of SD, there is no real bottom to be seen yet.
One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.December 28, 2007 at 4:06 PM #126067DWCAPParticipantHey Jimmyle,
Really interesting. Fun facts to spead when someone says housing never goes down, or if it does, it will only be by a few percent.
Ok, to add alittle of my own information. It isnt as good as yours, but considering I am sick in bed and bored out of my mind, please forgive.
I have been noticing that alot of the price reductions are local. This is obvious on the break down of the case shiller index into high, medium and low catagories. I decided to think of a few traditional middle class/lower middle class neighborhoods that would correspond to “median” income buyer, and see what was happening with sales. (I know this has been done a few times, but I wanted to do it myself.) I left out the really nice areas, and the inner city ghetto areas, mostly because I dont want to do the work.
Ok, first the problems I have identified, then the data. I dont have all the tools available to some on this board, so I just limited myself to was was available on Signonsandiego.com homesearch. They have sales data available going back years, and a nice easy number of total sales available today in a certain zipcode/area. I used Nov. 07, and Nov. 05 as comparisons since those are the years you chose in this thread, correspond ok to peaks, and are the latest data available to me (Nov.07) There was the problem of the fact that I am comparing today’s inventory with Novembers sales. However I tried to go back and use the first week of November inventory as listed on the SDlookup page for each. However, the numbers were not too different and some were higher and some lower, so I just stuck with one source.
Here is what I got.Area Nov 05 Nov 07 %change Dec 07 Months
sales sales sales inventory inventory
MiraM. 78 30 -61.5 314 10.5
ChuVista 379 169 -55.4 1995 11.8
Esco 167 94 -43.8 1648 17.5
Poway 48 24 -50.0 239 10.0
Clarmt 37 46 +24.3 180 3.9
LindaV. 27 30 +11.1 126 4.2
Oside 241 128 -46.9 1478 11.6
RB 177 154 -13.0 718 4.7Considering that 4-6 months is traditionally considered a healthy market, this is a really mixed bag. December is usually a slow month, with low inventory and sales. The fact that Escondido (92025,6,7,9) has 17+ months on the market, in DECEMBER, spells price drops to me. But Clairmont(92117), has a very healthy market according to these numbers and sales were picking up, not going down. Since overall sales are still falling, and inventory, especially when gaged by one month in winter, is still high in alot of SD, there is no real bottom to be seen yet.
One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.December 28, 2007 at 4:06 PM #126094DWCAPParticipantHey Jimmyle,
Really interesting. Fun facts to spead when someone says housing never goes down, or if it does, it will only be by a few percent.
Ok, to add alittle of my own information. It isnt as good as yours, but considering I am sick in bed and bored out of my mind, please forgive.
I have been noticing that alot of the price reductions are local. This is obvious on the break down of the case shiller index into high, medium and low catagories. I decided to think of a few traditional middle class/lower middle class neighborhoods that would correspond to “median” income buyer, and see what was happening with sales. (I know this has been done a few times, but I wanted to do it myself.) I left out the really nice areas, and the inner city ghetto areas, mostly because I dont want to do the work.
Ok, first the problems I have identified, then the data. I dont have all the tools available to some on this board, so I just limited myself to was was available on Signonsandiego.com homesearch. They have sales data available going back years, and a nice easy number of total sales available today in a certain zipcode/area. I used Nov. 07, and Nov. 05 as comparisons since those are the years you chose in this thread, correspond ok to peaks, and are the latest data available to me (Nov.07) There was the problem of the fact that I am comparing today’s inventory with Novembers sales. However I tried to go back and use the first week of November inventory as listed on the SDlookup page for each. However, the numbers were not too different and some were higher and some lower, so I just stuck with one source.
Here is what I got.Area Nov 05 Nov 07 %change Dec 07 Months
sales sales sales inventory inventory
MiraM. 78 30 -61.5 314 10.5
ChuVista 379 169 -55.4 1995 11.8
Esco 167 94 -43.8 1648 17.5
Poway 48 24 -50.0 239 10.0
Clarmt 37 46 +24.3 180 3.9
LindaV. 27 30 +11.1 126 4.2
Oside 241 128 -46.9 1478 11.6
RB 177 154 -13.0 718 4.7Considering that 4-6 months is traditionally considered a healthy market, this is a really mixed bag. December is usually a slow month, with low inventory and sales. The fact that Escondido (92025,6,7,9) has 17+ months on the market, in DECEMBER, spells price drops to me. But Clairmont(92117), has a very healthy market according to these numbers and sales were picking up, not going down. Since overall sales are still falling, and inventory, especially when gaged by one month in winter, is still high in alot of SD, there is no real bottom to be seen yet.
One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.December 28, 2007 at 4:33 PM #125845VoZangreParticipantWe are to Understand…
“One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.”
That condos are getting super-slammed, vraiment?
Voz
December 28, 2007 at 4:33 PM #125998VoZangreParticipantWe are to Understand…
“One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.”
That condos are getting super-slammed, vraiment?
Voz
December 28, 2007 at 4:33 PM #126016VoZangreParticipantWe are to Understand…
“One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.”
That condos are getting super-slammed, vraiment?
Voz
December 28, 2007 at 4:33 PM #126077VoZangreParticipantWe are to Understand…
“One more thing, I lumped condos, new building, and resales in together. Different segments are sure to be doing differently.”
That condos are getting super-slammed, vraiment?
Voz
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.