Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › 2005-2007 price comparison for Mira Mesa and Chula Vista

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 46 total)
1 2 3 4
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 28, 2007 at 1:09 PM #11346
    jimmyle
    Participant

    Using sdlookups.com I compared houses that was sold in 2005 and houses that were closed in Oct-Dec of 2005.

    December 28, 2007 at 1:17 PM #125735
    jimmyle
    Participant

    [img_assist|nid=5984|title=Mira Mesa-Chula Vista 2005-2007 price comparison|desc=image attached|link=node|align=left|width=283|height=500]

    Note that all houses in the two areas that were sold in 2005 and were again closed in Oct-Dec 2005 are included.

    December 28, 2007 at 1:17 PM #125994
    jimmyle
    Participant

    [img_assist|nid=5984|title=Mira Mesa-Chula Vista 2005-2007 price comparison|desc=image attached|link=node|align=left|width=283|height=500]

    Note that all houses in the two areas that were sold in 2005 and were again closed in Oct-Dec 2005 are included.

    December 28, 2007 at 1:17 PM #125967
    jimmyle
    Participant

    [img_assist|nid=5984|title=Mira Mesa-Chula Vista 2005-2007 price comparison|desc=image attached|link=node|align=left|width=283|height=500]

    Note that all houses in the two areas that were sold in 2005 and were again closed in Oct-Dec 2005 are included.

    December 28, 2007 at 1:17 PM #125888
    jimmyle
    Participant

    [img_assist|nid=5984|title=Mira Mesa-Chula Vista 2005-2007 price comparison|desc=image attached|link=node|align=left|width=283|height=500]

    Note that all houses in the two areas that were sold in 2005 and were again closed in Oct-Dec 2005 are included.

    December 28, 2007 at 1:17 PM #125906
    jimmyle
    Participant

    [img_assist|nid=5984|title=Mira Mesa-Chula Vista 2005-2007 price comparison|desc=image attached|link=node|align=left|width=283|height=500]

    Note that all houses in the two areas that were sold in 2005 and were again closed in Oct-Dec 2005 are included.

    December 28, 2007 at 2:56 PM #126043
    nostradamus
    Participant

    Good job, that seems right. I live in a condo which, at the height, was going for $400k but recent sales are around $300k so 24% is spot on, at least in my case.

    December 28, 2007 at 2:56 PM #126017
    nostradamus
    Participant

    Good job, that seems right. I live in a condo which, at the height, was going for $400k but recent sales are around $300k so 24% is spot on, at least in my case.

    December 28, 2007 at 2:56 PM #125954
    nostradamus
    Participant

    Good job, that seems right. I live in a condo which, at the height, was going for $400k but recent sales are around $300k so 24% is spot on, at least in my case.

    December 28, 2007 at 2:56 PM #125938
    nostradamus
    Participant

    Good job, that seems right. I live in a condo which, at the height, was going for $400k but recent sales are around $300k so 24% is spot on, at least in my case.

    December 28, 2007 at 2:56 PM #125785
    nostradamus
    Participant

    Good job, that seems right. I live in a condo which, at the height, was going for $400k but recent sales are around $300k so 24% is spot on, at least in my case.

    December 28, 2007 at 3:14 PM #125953
    jimmyle
    Participant

    I meant closed in Oct-Dec 2007.

    December 28, 2007 at 3:14 PM #126032
    jimmyle
    Participant

    I meant closed in Oct-Dec 2007.

    December 28, 2007 at 3:14 PM #126058
    jimmyle
    Participant

    I meant closed in Oct-Dec 2007.

    December 28, 2007 at 3:14 PM #125970
    jimmyle
    Participant

    I meant closed in Oct-Dec 2007.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 46 total)
1 2 3 4
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.