[EconProf]

My point was that while the rest of the nation comes to its senses about government spending and big government, CA moves to the left in electing its local, state, and federal politicians. Boxer is the most prominent example.

[EconProf]

My point was that while the rest of the nation comes to its senses about government spending and big government, CA moves to the left in electing its local, state, and federal politicians. Boxer is the most prominent example.

[EconProf]

My point was that while the rest of the nation comes to its senses about government spending and big government, CA moves to the left in electing its local, state, and federal politicians. Boxer is the most prominent example.

[EconProf]

My point was that while the rest of the nation comes to its senses about government spending and big government, CA moves to the left in electing its local, state, and federal politicians. Boxer is the most prominent example.

[EconProf]

We in California have done this to ourselves. The leftward lurch in this state that has lavished pay and benefits on state and local workers was just reinforced by the recent election. While the rest of the nation wakes up to the folly of big government, CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate while other states boot her type out.
There is little hope for change, since our demographic trends are to repel our middle class taxpayers and attract the tax users from other states and countries. We are doomed.

[EconProf]

We in California have done this to ourselves. The leftward lurch in this state that has lavished pay and benefits on state and local workers was just reinforced by the recent election. While the rest of the nation wakes up to the folly of big government, CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate while other states boot her type out.
There is little hope for change, since our demographic trends are to repel our middle class taxpayers and attract the tax users from other states and countries. We are doomed.

[EconProf]

We in California have done this to ourselves. The leftward lurch in this state that has lavished pay and benefits on state and local workers was just reinforced by the recent election. While the rest of the nation wakes up to the folly of big government, CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate while other states boot her type out.
There is little hope for change, since our demographic trends are to repel our middle class taxpayers and attract the tax users from other states and countries. We are doomed.

[EconProf]

We in California have done this to ourselves. The leftward lurch in this state that has lavished pay and benefits on state and local workers was just reinforced by the recent election. While the rest of the nation wakes up to the folly of big government, CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate while other states boot her type out.
There is little hope for change, since our demographic trends are to repel our middle class taxpayers and attract the tax users from other states and countries. We are doomed.

[EconProf]

We in California have done this to ourselves. The leftward lurch in this state that has lavished pay and benefits on state and local workers was just reinforced by the recent election. While the rest of the nation wakes up to the folly of big government, CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate while other states boot her type out.
There is little hope for change, since our demographic trends are to repel our middle class taxpayers and attract the tax users from other states and countries. We are doomed.

[EconProf]

Having grown up in St. Paul, I can understand your decision to chose the environment of a small CA city over the bustle and impersonal nature of a coastal big city. A lot more people and businesses are chosing to leave CA for other states, and the recent election results will succeed in pushing more taxpayers out. While you are not actually leaving the state, you are moving to a place that is tourist-based, so should do all right as the rest of CA withers.

[EconProf]

Having grown up in St. Paul, I can understand your decision to chose the environment of a small CA city over the bustle and impersonal nature of a coastal big city. A lot more people and businesses are chosing to leave CA for other states, and the recent election results will succeed in pushing more taxpayers out. While you are not actually leaving the state, you are moving to a place that is tourist-based, so should do all right as the rest of CA withers.

[EconProf]

Having grown up in St. Paul, I can understand your decision to chose the environment of a small CA city over the bustle and impersonal nature of a coastal big city. A lot more people and businesses are chosing to leave CA for other states, and the recent election results will succeed in pushing more taxpayers out. While you are not actually leaving the state, you are moving to a place that is tourist-based, so should do all right as the rest of CA withers.

[EconProf]

Having grown up in St. Paul, I can understand your decision to chose the environment of a small CA city over the bustle and impersonal nature of a coastal big city. A lot more people and businesses are chosing to leave CA for other states, and the recent election results will succeed in pushing more taxpayers out. While you are not actually leaving the state, you are moving to a place that is tourist-based, so should do all right as the rest of CA withers.

[EconProf]

Having grown up in St. Paul, I can understand your decision to chose the environment of a small CA city over the bustle and impersonal nature of a coastal big city. A lot more people and businesses are chosing to leave CA for other states, and the recent election results will succeed in pushing more taxpayers out. While you are not actually leaving the state, you are moving to a place that is tourist-based, so should do all right as the rest of CA withers.

[EconProf]

Barnaby, an increase in hiring could occur across the board in most all businesses, provided the lame duck congress does not chose to go out with a bang and enact more of their looney agenda or not extend the Bush tax cuts.
Most recessions have a “snap-back” phase after bottoming, where businesses replenish their inventories, consumers make long-delayed purchases of vehicles, clothing, etc., and the recovery gains strength as it feeds on itself. That obviously hasn’t happened yet, and I believe it is partly because of the pessimism about our future business costs, taxes, etc.

[Author]

Posts