Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
cr
ParticipantWhere are all the “raise taxes” cheerleaders now?
This is the time to lower taxes, not raise them.
When gambling revenues become an integral source of income for a state economy – so integral they decide to borrow against future revenues – it’s time to change leadership.
ParticipantWhere are all the “raise taxes” cheerleaders now?
This is the time to lower taxes, not raise them.
When gambling revenues become an integral source of income for a state economy – so integral they decide to borrow against future revenues – it’s time to change leadership.
ParticipantWhere are all the “raise taxes” cheerleaders now?
This is the time to lower taxes, not raise them.
When gambling revenues become an integral source of income for a state economy – so integral they decide to borrow against future revenues – it’s time to change leadership.
ParticipantWhere are all the “raise taxes” cheerleaders now?
This is the time to lower taxes, not raise them.
When gambling revenues become an integral source of income for a state economy – so integral they decide to borrow against future revenues – it’s time to change leadership.
ParticipantMaybe the $47B is to cover the pensions for those 47,000 layoffs.
That and the wonderful UAW.
And Scarlet, most people who come here and start insulting the intelligence of a group that is actually quite educated and insightful only end up looking like the bigger fool in the end.
That or they get banned from the sight. Might want to tone it down a bit.
ParticipantMaybe the $47B is to cover the pensions for those 47,000 layoffs.
That and the wonderful UAW.
And Scarlet, most people who come here and start insulting the intelligence of a group that is actually quite educated and insightful only end up looking like the bigger fool in the end.
That or they get banned from the sight. Might want to tone it down a bit.
ParticipantMaybe the $47B is to cover the pensions for those 47,000 layoffs.
That and the wonderful UAW.
And Scarlet, most people who come here and start insulting the intelligence of a group that is actually quite educated and insightful only end up looking like the bigger fool in the end.
That or they get banned from the sight. Might want to tone it down a bit.
ParticipantMaybe the $47B is to cover the pensions for those 47,000 layoffs.
That and the wonderful UAW.
And Scarlet, most people who come here and start insulting the intelligence of a group that is actually quite educated and insightful only end up looking like the bigger fool in the end.
That or they get banned from the sight. Might want to tone it down a bit.
ParticipantMaybe the $47B is to cover the pensions for those 47,000 layoffs.
That and the wonderful UAW.
And Scarlet, most people who come here and start insulting the intelligence of a group that is actually quite educated and insightful only end up looking like the bigger fool in the end.
That or they get banned from the sight. Might want to tone it down a bit.
ParticipantCA just received a massive loan for unemployment benefits, and has one of the highest unemployment rates in the union. (3rd according to this.
State workers drain money whether working or not. At least unemployed they’re paid less, and can eventually find a real job.
The issue should be who gets laid-off. I think they should start with councilmen, board and committee members and other wastes of space who got the budget where it is.
ParticipantCA just received a massive loan for unemployment benefits, and has one of the highest unemployment rates in the union. (3rd according to this.
State workers drain money whether working or not. At least unemployed they’re paid less, and can eventually find a real job.
The issue should be who gets laid-off. I think they should start with councilmen, board and committee members and other wastes of space who got the budget where it is.
ParticipantCA just received a massive loan for unemployment benefits, and has one of the highest unemployment rates in the union. (3rd according to this.
State workers drain money whether working or not. At least unemployed they’re paid less, and can eventually find a real job.
The issue should be who gets laid-off. I think they should start with councilmen, board and committee members and other wastes of space who got the budget where it is.
ParticipantCA just received a massive loan for unemployment benefits, and has one of the highest unemployment rates in the union. (3rd according to this.
State workers drain money whether working or not. At least unemployed they’re paid less, and can eventually find a real job.
The issue should be who gets laid-off. I think they should start with councilmen, board and committee members and other wastes of space who got the budget where it is.
ParticipantCA just received a massive loan for unemployment benefits, and has one of the highest unemployment rates in the union. (3rd according to this.
State workers drain money whether working or not. At least unemployed they’re paid less, and can eventually find a real job.
The issue should be who gets laid-off. I think they should start with councilmen, board and committee members and other wastes of space who got the budget where it is.
-
AuthorPosts
