[cooperthedog]

Marion, some of your statements are contradictions.

You are simultaneously old-fashioned, wanting the man to lead/pay for dates, yet you’re independent and NEED to be financially self-reliant, but require joint-accounts when married (though you wouldn’t want to buy a house with someone again), even though you infer that your net worth is higher than your mate. You don’t like stinginess, yet you don’t pay for the dates, and don’t appear to be receiptive to the (great) idea other posters had about you taking control of the next date…

???

[cooperthedog]

Marion, some of your statements are contradictions.

You are simultaneously old-fashioned, wanting the man to lead/pay for dates, yet you’re independent and NEED to be financially self-reliant, but require joint-accounts when married (though you wouldn’t want to buy a house with someone again), even though you infer that your net worth is higher than your mate. You don’t like stinginess, yet you don’t pay for the dates, and don’t appear to be receiptive to the (great) idea other posters had about you taking control of the next date…

???

[cooperthedog]

Marion, some of your statements are contradictions.

You are simultaneously old-fashioned, wanting the man to lead/pay for dates, yet you’re independent and NEED to be financially self-reliant, but require joint-accounts when married (though you wouldn’t want to buy a house with someone again), even though you infer that your net worth is higher than your mate. You don’t like stinginess, yet you don’t pay for the dates, and don’t appear to be receiptive to the (great) idea other posters had about you taking control of the next date…

???

[cooperthedog]

Marion, some of your statements are contradictions.

You are simultaneously old-fashioned, wanting the man to lead/pay for dates, yet you’re independent and NEED to be financially self-reliant, but require joint-accounts when married (though you wouldn’t want to buy a house with someone again), even though you infer that your net worth is higher than your mate. You don’t like stinginess, yet you don’t pay for the dates, and don’t appear to be receiptive to the (great) idea other posters had about you taking control of the next date…

???

[cooperthedog]

Marion, some of your statements are contradictions.

You are simultaneously old-fashioned, wanting the man to lead/pay for dates, yet you’re independent and NEED to be financially self-reliant, but require joint-accounts when married (though you wouldn’t want to buy a house with someone again), even though you infer that your net worth is higher than your mate. You don’t like stinginess, yet you don’t pay for the dates, and don’t appear to be receiptive to the (great) idea other posters had about you taking control of the next date…

???

[cooperthedog]

SureFIRE method! .

Materials: Gasoline, matches, verifiable alibi.

1) Douse entire house with gasoline (or incendiary of your choice).

2) Strike match, toss, run.

3) Collect insurance payout at last comp, sell raw land (after smoldering stops).

Alternative method –

Materials: 5 drums of crude oil, shovel, day labor

1) Dig large hole in backyard

2) Pour oil into hole, cover loosely with dirt

3) During open house, begrudingly disclose “problem” of black gunk seeping out of the ground, offer small discount to potential buyers as a landscaping credit…

[cooperthedog]

SureFIRE method! .

Materials: Gasoline, matches, verifiable alibi.

1) Douse entire house with gasoline (or incendiary of your choice).

2) Strike match, toss, run.

3) Collect insurance payout at last comp, sell raw land (after smoldering stops).

Alternative method –

Materials: 5 drums of crude oil, shovel, day labor

1) Dig large hole in backyard

2) Pour oil into hole, cover loosely with dirt

3) During open house, begrudingly disclose “problem” of black gunk seeping out of the ground, offer small discount to potential buyers as a landscaping credit…

[cooperthedog]

SureFIRE method! .

Materials: Gasoline, matches, verifiable alibi.

1) Douse entire house with gasoline (or incendiary of your choice).

2) Strike match, toss, run.

3) Collect insurance payout at last comp, sell raw land (after smoldering stops).

Alternative method –

Materials: 5 drums of crude oil, shovel, day labor

1) Dig large hole in backyard

2) Pour oil into hole, cover loosely with dirt

3) During open house, begrudingly disclose “problem” of black gunk seeping out of the ground, offer small discount to potential buyers as a landscaping credit…

[cooperthedog]

SureFIRE method! .

Materials: Gasoline, matches, verifiable alibi.

1) Douse entire house with gasoline (or incendiary of your choice).

2) Strike match, toss, run.

3) Collect insurance payout at last comp, sell raw land (after smoldering stops).

Alternative method –

Materials: 5 drums of crude oil, shovel, day labor

1) Dig large hole in backyard

2) Pour oil into hole, cover loosely with dirt

3) During open house, begrudingly disclose “problem” of black gunk seeping out of the ground, offer small discount to potential buyers as a landscaping credit…

[cooperthedog]

SureFIRE method! .

Materials: Gasoline, matches, verifiable alibi.

1) Douse entire house with gasoline (or incendiary of your choice).

2) Strike match, toss, run.

3) Collect insurance payout at last comp, sell raw land (after smoldering stops).

Alternative method –

Materials: 5 drums of crude oil, shovel, day labor

1) Dig large hole in backyard

2) Pour oil into hole, cover loosely with dirt

3) During open house, begrudingly disclose “problem” of black gunk seeping out of the ground, offer small discount to potential buyers as a landscaping credit…

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[Author]

Posts