Wikileaks to out a major US Bank

[Arraya]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-zogby/israel-using-wikileaks-to_b_792009.html

From the day the first batch of WikiLeaks appeared in the international press, the Israelis were crowing “this is good for us”. Seizing on documents demonstrating that some Arab leaders bear ill-will toward Iran, the Israeli spin machine went into action. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu boasted that “Our region has been hostage to a narrative that is the result of 60 years of propaganda, which paints Israel as the greatest threat”, claiming that Iran had, in fact, eclipsed the Palestinian issue as the number one concern of the Arab World. Another prominent Israeli official gloated that “Iran was now ten times more important than Palestine” and that it was now time to shelve the “peace effort” and focus attention on Iran.

My first reaction was “how silly, yet predictable”. My second was “how dangerous”.

[GH]

Me thinks WikiLeaks should have chosen their battles and fought the ones they could win. Having gone after a superpower they are being spanked and I doubt they will be outing anyone. A shame, because I suspect the bank info would have had a lot more relevance to us than some foreign policy stuff, none of which is particularly damning! I would love to see some really incriminating material published about a major bank published. Chase would be my preference since I have always had good experiences with BOFA, but then…

[GH]

Me thinks WikiLeaks should have chosen their battles and fought the ones they could win. Having gone after a superpower they are being spanked and I doubt they will be outing anyone. A shame, because I suspect the bank info would have had a lot more relevance to us than some foreign policy stuff, none of which is particularly damning! I would love to see some really incriminating material published about a major bank published. Chase would be my preference since I have always had good experiences with BOFA, but then…

[GH]

Me thinks WikiLeaks should have chosen their battles and fought the ones they could win. Having gone after a superpower they are being spanked and I doubt they will be outing anyone. A shame, because I suspect the bank info would have had a lot more relevance to us than some foreign policy stuff, none of which is particularly damning! I would love to see some really incriminating material published about a major bank published. Chase would be my preference since I have always had good experiences with BOFA, but then…

[GH]

Me thinks WikiLeaks should have chosen their battles and fought the ones they could win. Having gone after a superpower they are being spanked and I doubt they will be outing anyone. A shame, because I suspect the bank info would have had a lot more relevance to us than some foreign policy stuff, none of which is particularly damning! I would love to see some really incriminating material published about a major bank published. Chase would be my preference since I have always had good experiences with BOFA, but then…

[GH]

Me thinks WikiLeaks should have chosen their battles and fought the ones they could win. Having gone after a superpower they are being spanked and I doubt they will be outing anyone. A shame, because I suspect the bank info would have had a lot more relevance to us than some foreign policy stuff, none of which is particularly damning! I would love to see some really incriminating material published about a major bank published. Chase would be my preference since I have always had good experiences with BOFA, but then…

[moneymaker]

I pretty much agree with everything pri_dk has stated. Makes me want to logon to Wikileaks just so that I can find out who’s got better spy skills the government or my employer. Pretty sure the government will be 2nd to the info. Here goes, I’m doing it now.Damn can’t find it.

[moneymaker]

I pretty much agree with everything pri_dk has stated. Makes me want to logon to Wikileaks just so that I can find out who’s got better spy skills the government or my employer. Pretty sure the government will be 2nd to the info. Here goes, I’m doing it now.Damn can’t find it.

[moneymaker]

I pretty much agree with everything pri_dk has stated. Makes me want to logon to Wikileaks just so that I can find out who’s got better spy skills the government or my employer. Pretty sure the government will be 2nd to the info. Here goes, I’m doing it now.Damn can’t find it.

[moneymaker]

I pretty much agree with everything pri_dk has stated. Makes me want to logon to Wikileaks just so that I can find out who’s got better spy skills the government or my employer. Pretty sure the government will be 2nd to the info. Here goes, I’m doing it now.Damn can’t find it.

[moneymaker]

I pretty much agree with everything pri_dk has stated. Makes me want to logon to Wikileaks just so that I can find out who’s got better spy skills the government or my employer. Pretty sure the government will be 2nd to the info. Here goes, I’m doing it now.Damn can’t find it.

[Arraya]

Is AIPAC a Wikileaks Operation?
http://www.juancole.com/
Rosen has now launched a $20 million wrongful terminatio n suit against AIPAC. He maintains that his action of delivering the classified document to the Israeli embassy was standard operating procedure in AIPAC, and that he did nothing out of the ordinary, and that he should not have been fired. He is also threatenin g to name details of this routine spying.

Rosen, ironically , was hired by Daniel Pipes’ so-called ‘Middle East Forum.’ Pipes runs Campus Watch, which is a neo-McCart hyite attempt to intimate US college professors into toeing the Likud Party line whenever they talk about Israel and Palestine. So it is only natural that an indicted spy for Israel, Rosen, should be on staff and energetica lly using dirty tricks to smear the reputation s of patriotic Americans.

What Steven Rosen is alleging is that AIPAC, which arranges for millions to go to the campaigns of American politician s, is in essence a Wikileaks operation, only instead of posting the ferreted-o ut classified material to the Web, they channel it to the Israeli government . (Of course, the Israeli government sometimes acts as a Wikileaks as well; Seymour Hersh was told by US intelligen ce officials that Israel shared with the Soviets some of the intel it got from spy Jonathan Pollard.)

Whether the allegations about AIPAC routine spying are true or not, Rosen and Weissman certainly did exactly the same thing Julian Assange did, and yet they are free men.

Rep. Pete King (R-NY), who wants Eric Holder to prosecute Julian Assange of Wikileaks, hasn’t objected to the cases against Rosen and Weissman being dropped, and hasn’t asked for an investigation of AIPAC. One of the problems congressmen like this will have in crafting anti-Wikileaks legislation is that they may well be driving a nail into AIPAC’s coffin, as well. King, who keeps accusing Americans of being terrorists, is also known as a long-time supporter of the Irish Republican Army.

[Arraya]

Is AIPAC a Wikileaks Operation?
http://www.juancole.com/
Rosen has now launched a $20 million wrongful terminatio n suit against AIPAC. He maintains that his action of delivering the classified document to the Israeli embassy was standard operating procedure in AIPAC, and that he did nothing out of the ordinary, and that he should not have been fired. He is also threatenin g to name details of this routine spying.

Rosen, ironically , was hired by Daniel Pipes’ so-called ‘Middle East Forum.’ Pipes runs Campus Watch, which is a neo-McCart hyite attempt to intimate US college professors into toeing the Likud Party line whenever they talk about Israel and Palestine. So it is only natural that an indicted spy for Israel, Rosen, should be on staff and energetica lly using dirty tricks to smear the reputation s of patriotic Americans.

What Steven Rosen is alleging is that AIPAC, which arranges for millions to go to the campaigns of American politician s, is in essence a Wikileaks operation, only instead of posting the ferreted-o ut classified material to the Web, they channel it to the Israeli government . (Of course, the Israeli government sometimes acts as a Wikileaks as well; Seymour Hersh was told by US intelligen ce officials that Israel shared with the Soviets some of the intel it got from spy Jonathan Pollard.)

Whether the allegations about AIPAC routine spying are true or not, Rosen and Weissman certainly did exactly the same thing Julian Assange did, and yet they are free men.

Rep. Pete King (R-NY), who wants Eric Holder to prosecute Julian Assange of Wikileaks, hasn’t objected to the cases against Rosen and Weissman being dropped, and hasn’t asked for an investigation of AIPAC. One of the problems congressmen like this will have in crafting anti-Wikileaks legislation is that they may well be driving a nail into AIPAC’s coffin, as well. King, who keeps accusing Americans of being terrorists, is also known as a long-time supporter of the Irish Republican Army.

[Arraya]

Is AIPAC a Wikileaks Operation?
http://www.juancole.com/
Rosen has now launched a $20 million wrongful terminatio n suit against AIPAC. He maintains that his action of delivering the classified document to the Israeli embassy was standard operating procedure in AIPAC, and that he did nothing out of the ordinary, and that he should not have been fired. He is also threatenin g to name details of this routine spying.

Rosen, ironically , was hired by Daniel Pipes’ so-called ‘Middle East Forum.’ Pipes runs Campus Watch, which is a neo-McCart hyite attempt to intimate US college professors into toeing the Likud Party line whenever they talk about Israel and Palestine. So it is only natural that an indicted spy for Israel, Rosen, should be on staff and energetica lly using dirty tricks to smear the reputation s of patriotic Americans.

What Steven Rosen is alleging is that AIPAC, which arranges for millions to go to the campaigns of American politician s, is in essence a Wikileaks operation, only instead of posting the ferreted-o ut classified material to the Web, they channel it to the Israeli government . (Of course, the Israeli government sometimes acts as a Wikileaks as well; Seymour Hersh was told by US intelligen ce officials that Israel shared with the Soviets some of the intel it got from spy Jonathan Pollard.)

Whether the allegations about AIPAC routine spying are true or not, Rosen and Weissman certainly did exactly the same thing Julian Assange did, and yet they are free men.

Rep. Pete King (R-NY), who wants Eric Holder to prosecute Julian Assange of Wikileaks, hasn’t objected to the cases against Rosen and Weissman being dropped, and hasn’t asked for an investigation of AIPAC. One of the problems congressmen like this will have in crafting anti-Wikileaks legislation is that they may well be driving a nail into AIPAC’s coffin, as well. King, who keeps accusing Americans of being terrorists, is also known as a long-time supporter of the Irish Republican Army.

[Arraya]

Is AIPAC a Wikileaks Operation?
http://www.juancole.com/
Rosen has now launched a $20 million wrongful terminatio n suit against AIPAC. He maintains that his action of delivering the classified document to the Israeli embassy was standard operating procedure in AIPAC, and that he did nothing out of the ordinary, and that he should not have been fired. He is also threatenin g to name details of this routine spying.

Rosen, ironically , was hired by Daniel Pipes’ so-called ‘Middle East Forum.’ Pipes runs Campus Watch, which is a neo-McCart hyite attempt to intimate US college professors into toeing the Likud Party line whenever they talk about Israel and Palestine. So it is only natural that an indicted spy for Israel, Rosen, should be on staff and energetica lly using dirty tricks to smear the reputation s of patriotic Americans.

What Steven Rosen is alleging is that AIPAC, which arranges for millions to go to the campaigns of American politician s, is in essence a Wikileaks operation, only instead of posting the ferreted-o ut classified material to the Web, they channel it to the Israeli government . (Of course, the Israeli government sometimes acts as a Wikileaks as well; Seymour Hersh was told by US intelligen ce officials that Israel shared with the Soviets some of the intel it got from spy Jonathan Pollard.)

Whether the allegations about AIPAC routine spying are true or not, Rosen and Weissman certainly did exactly the same thing Julian Assange did, and yet they are free men.

Rep. Pete King (R-NY), who wants Eric Holder to prosecute Julian Assange of Wikileaks, hasn’t objected to the cases against Rosen and Weissman being dropped, and hasn’t asked for an investigation of AIPAC. One of the problems congressmen like this will have in crafting anti-Wikileaks legislation is that they may well be driving a nail into AIPAC’s coffin, as well. King, who keeps accusing Americans of being terrorists, is also known as a long-time supporter of the Irish Republican Army.

[Author]

Posts