Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › What am I missing? Is that a train coming at me or am I Chicken Little?
- This topic has 176 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by jonnycsd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 21, 2008 at 1:19 PM #174800March 21, 2008 at 1:23 PM #174362drunkleParticipant
echo:
i’ve already made the suggestion that you park your money in treasuries. if your 401k fund does not have a pure treasury option, take your pick on the bond funds. odds are, the bond values will be propped up by the fed/gov or at least, the values will not drop as hard as the equity funds. but cross your fingers just in case.
March 21, 2008 at 1:23 PM #174707drunkleParticipantecho:
i’ve already made the suggestion that you park your money in treasuries. if your 401k fund does not have a pure treasury option, take your pick on the bond funds. odds are, the bond values will be propped up by the fed/gov or at least, the values will not drop as hard as the equity funds. but cross your fingers just in case.
March 21, 2008 at 1:23 PM #174713drunkleParticipantecho:
i’ve already made the suggestion that you park your money in treasuries. if your 401k fund does not have a pure treasury option, take your pick on the bond funds. odds are, the bond values will be propped up by the fed/gov or at least, the values will not drop as hard as the equity funds. but cross your fingers just in case.
March 21, 2008 at 1:23 PM #174722drunkleParticipantecho:
i’ve already made the suggestion that you park your money in treasuries. if your 401k fund does not have a pure treasury option, take your pick on the bond funds. odds are, the bond values will be propped up by the fed/gov or at least, the values will not drop as hard as the equity funds. but cross your fingers just in case.
March 21, 2008 at 1:23 PM #174810drunkleParticipantecho:
i’ve already made the suggestion that you park your money in treasuries. if your 401k fund does not have a pure treasury option, take your pick on the bond funds. odds are, the bond values will be propped up by the fed/gov or at least, the values will not drop as hard as the equity funds. but cross your fingers just in case.
March 21, 2008 at 1:44 PM #174371DWCAPParticipantHAHAHAHAHAHA, (ghasp) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Beany baby market! Perfect. Thank you for that. I needed to laugh today. What better symbol is there for an entire market built on the idea that everyone else is doing it, so I should too!
Also, I agreed with alot of what jonny said, but not all. But what I really have to disagree with was the real estate as a hedge against inflation second comment. Not that he isnt correct, but that we should look to tradition. This is the most untraditional downturn since 1929. Real estate and its bubble popping are the real problem. So much capital was blown on non-productive investment that it is killing us. You can recycle a machine or use a store as a resturant, you can switch from Cotton to corn to soybeans, but you cant go from housing to Ag or industrial. The idea that the best way to invest is to follow tradition in an untraditional market is retarded.
Dont expect your rapidly depreciating house to be a good hedge against inflation. If anything, you should wait, as both your dollars and that house will be cheaper in the future.March 21, 2008 at 1:44 PM #174718DWCAPParticipantHAHAHAHAHAHA, (ghasp) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Beany baby market! Perfect. Thank you for that. I needed to laugh today. What better symbol is there for an entire market built on the idea that everyone else is doing it, so I should too!
Also, I agreed with alot of what jonny said, but not all. But what I really have to disagree with was the real estate as a hedge against inflation second comment. Not that he isnt correct, but that we should look to tradition. This is the most untraditional downturn since 1929. Real estate and its bubble popping are the real problem. So much capital was blown on non-productive investment that it is killing us. You can recycle a machine or use a store as a resturant, you can switch from Cotton to corn to soybeans, but you cant go from housing to Ag or industrial. The idea that the best way to invest is to follow tradition in an untraditional market is retarded.
Dont expect your rapidly depreciating house to be a good hedge against inflation. If anything, you should wait, as both your dollars and that house will be cheaper in the future.March 21, 2008 at 1:44 PM #174725DWCAPParticipantHAHAHAHAHAHA, (ghasp) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Beany baby market! Perfect. Thank you for that. I needed to laugh today. What better symbol is there for an entire market built on the idea that everyone else is doing it, so I should too!
Also, I agreed with alot of what jonny said, but not all. But what I really have to disagree with was the real estate as a hedge against inflation second comment. Not that he isnt correct, but that we should look to tradition. This is the most untraditional downturn since 1929. Real estate and its bubble popping are the real problem. So much capital was blown on non-productive investment that it is killing us. You can recycle a machine or use a store as a resturant, you can switch from Cotton to corn to soybeans, but you cant go from housing to Ag or industrial. The idea that the best way to invest is to follow tradition in an untraditional market is retarded.
Dont expect your rapidly depreciating house to be a good hedge against inflation. If anything, you should wait, as both your dollars and that house will be cheaper in the future.March 21, 2008 at 1:44 PM #174732DWCAPParticipantHAHAHAHAHAHA, (ghasp) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Beany baby market! Perfect. Thank you for that. I needed to laugh today. What better symbol is there for an entire market built on the idea that everyone else is doing it, so I should too!
Also, I agreed with alot of what jonny said, but not all. But what I really have to disagree with was the real estate as a hedge against inflation second comment. Not that he isnt correct, but that we should look to tradition. This is the most untraditional downturn since 1929. Real estate and its bubble popping are the real problem. So much capital was blown on non-productive investment that it is killing us. You can recycle a machine or use a store as a resturant, you can switch from Cotton to corn to soybeans, but you cant go from housing to Ag or industrial. The idea that the best way to invest is to follow tradition in an untraditional market is retarded.
Dont expect your rapidly depreciating house to be a good hedge against inflation. If anything, you should wait, as both your dollars and that house will be cheaper in the future.March 21, 2008 at 1:44 PM #174820DWCAPParticipantHAHAHAHAHAHA, (ghasp) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Beany baby market! Perfect. Thank you for that. I needed to laugh today. What better symbol is there for an entire market built on the idea that everyone else is doing it, so I should too!
Also, I agreed with alot of what jonny said, but not all. But what I really have to disagree with was the real estate as a hedge against inflation second comment. Not that he isnt correct, but that we should look to tradition. This is the most untraditional downturn since 1929. Real estate and its bubble popping are the real problem. So much capital was blown on non-productive investment that it is killing us. You can recycle a machine or use a store as a resturant, you can switch from Cotton to corn to soybeans, but you cant go from housing to Ag or industrial. The idea that the best way to invest is to follow tradition in an untraditional market is retarded.
Dont expect your rapidly depreciating house to be a good hedge against inflation. If anything, you should wait, as both your dollars and that house will be cheaper in the future.March 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM #174383AnonymousGuestThe inflation/deflation debate.
As far as I am concern, the game is not over yet.
Right now, we are having a monetary deflation as noted by decline asset values in house, stock…etc. We are also having a consumer price inflation in energy and food that I feel mostly is driven by speculation.
If the U.S. government doesn’t print any more money, we will eventually deflate.
If the U.S. government decides to print money to monetize debt, we will hyper-inflate.
The debate should be, can/would the U.S. government monetize the debt. They have the next move, and your move should depend on their move.
March 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM #174730AnonymousGuestThe inflation/deflation debate.
As far as I am concern, the game is not over yet.
Right now, we are having a monetary deflation as noted by decline asset values in house, stock…etc. We are also having a consumer price inflation in energy and food that I feel mostly is driven by speculation.
If the U.S. government doesn’t print any more money, we will eventually deflate.
If the U.S. government decides to print money to monetize debt, we will hyper-inflate.
The debate should be, can/would the U.S. government monetize the debt. They have the next move, and your move should depend on their move.
March 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM #174734AnonymousGuestThe inflation/deflation debate.
As far as I am concern, the game is not over yet.
Right now, we are having a monetary deflation as noted by decline asset values in house, stock…etc. We are also having a consumer price inflation in energy and food that I feel mostly is driven by speculation.
If the U.S. government doesn’t print any more money, we will eventually deflate.
If the U.S. government decides to print money to monetize debt, we will hyper-inflate.
The debate should be, can/would the U.S. government monetize the debt. They have the next move, and your move should depend on their move.
March 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM #174742AnonymousGuestThe inflation/deflation debate.
As far as I am concern, the game is not over yet.
Right now, we are having a monetary deflation as noted by decline asset values in house, stock…etc. We are also having a consumer price inflation in energy and food that I feel mostly is driven by speculation.
If the U.S. government doesn’t print any more money, we will eventually deflate.
If the U.S. government decides to print money to monetize debt, we will hyper-inflate.
The debate should be, can/would the U.S. government monetize the debt. They have the next move, and your move should depend on their move.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.