- This topic has 850 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
sobmaz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 21, 2010 at 9:44 PM #529472March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #528544
briansd1
Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #528675briansd1
Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #529124briansd1
Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #529222briansd1
Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #529482briansd1
Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #528554ybitz
Participant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #528685ybitz
Participant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #529134ybitz
Participant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #529232ybitz
Participant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #529492ybitz
Participant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM #528564briansd1
GuestI think that when the bill is implemented, costs will got up substantially in the beginning years as people with no teeth and bad health, who didn’t have insurance, get it and ask for the “deferred maintenance” that they need.
But in the decades ahead and the whole population is covered, costs will come down.
It’s kinda like allowing comprehensive auto insurance for pre-existing body damage. A lot of folks will be filing claims.
The hospitals and drug companies will benefit.
March 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM #528695briansd1
GuestI think that when the bill is implemented, costs will got up substantially in the beginning years as people with no teeth and bad health, who didn’t have insurance, get it and ask for the “deferred maintenance” that they need.
But in the decades ahead and the whole population is covered, costs will come down.
It’s kinda like allowing comprehensive auto insurance for pre-existing body damage. A lot of folks will be filing claims.
The hospitals and drug companies will benefit.
March 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM #529144briansd1
GuestI think that when the bill is implemented, costs will got up substantially in the beginning years as people with no teeth and bad health, who didn’t have insurance, get it and ask for the “deferred maintenance” that they need.
But in the decades ahead and the whole population is covered, costs will come down.
It’s kinda like allowing comprehensive auto insurance for pre-existing body damage. A lot of folks will be filing claims.
The hospitals and drug companies will benefit.
March 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM #529243briansd1
GuestI think that when the bill is implemented, costs will got up substantially in the beginning years as people with no teeth and bad health, who didn’t have insurance, get it and ask for the “deferred maintenance” that they need.
But in the decades ahead and the whole population is covered, costs will come down.
It’s kinda like allowing comprehensive auto insurance for pre-existing body damage. A lot of folks will be filing claims.
The hospitals and drug companies will benefit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
