- This topic has 850 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by sobmaz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 21, 2010 at 9:44 PM #529472March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #528544briansd1Guest
[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #528675briansd1Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #529124briansd1Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #529222briansd1Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM #529482briansd1Guest[quote=svelte]Not the perfect reform, but much better than no reform.[/quote]
I also agree. Better than nothing and a step in the right direction.
Reform will occur over time; it won’t happen overnight.
Financial reform will also happen in fits and starts; it won’t happen in one single legislation. And we can’t expect everything to be done in one bill.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #528554ybitzParticipant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #528685ybitzParticipant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #529134ybitzParticipant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #529232ybitzParticipant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM #529492ybitzParticipant[quote=paramount]
My feelings exactly.
We need to separate medical insurance from employment.[/quote]
I agree. By tying health insurance and employment, it makes losing a job that much harder on folks. Those without employment are least capable of affording health care.
March 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM #528564briansd1GuestI think that when the bill is implemented, costs will got up substantially in the beginning years as people with no teeth and bad health, who didn’t have insurance, get it and ask for the “deferred maintenance” that they need.
But in the decades ahead and the whole population is covered, costs will come down.
It’s kinda like allowing comprehensive auto insurance for pre-existing body damage. A lot of folks will be filing claims.
The hospitals and drug companies will benefit.
March 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM #528695briansd1GuestI think that when the bill is implemented, costs will got up substantially in the beginning years as people with no teeth and bad health, who didn’t have insurance, get it and ask for the “deferred maintenance” that they need.
But in the decades ahead and the whole population is covered, costs will come down.
It’s kinda like allowing comprehensive auto insurance for pre-existing body damage. A lot of folks will be filing claims.
The hospitals and drug companies will benefit.
March 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM #529144briansd1GuestI think that when the bill is implemented, costs will got up substantially in the beginning years as people with no teeth and bad health, who didn’t have insurance, get it and ask for the “deferred maintenance” that they need.
But in the decades ahead and the whole population is covered, costs will come down.
It’s kinda like allowing comprehensive auto insurance for pre-existing body damage. A lot of folks will be filing claims.
The hospitals and drug companies will benefit.
March 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM #529243briansd1GuestI think that when the bill is implemented, costs will got up substantially in the beginning years as people with no teeth and bad health, who didn’t have insurance, get it and ask for the “deferred maintenance” that they need.
But in the decades ahead and the whole population is covered, costs will come down.
It’s kinda like allowing comprehensive auto insurance for pre-existing body damage. A lot of folks will be filing claims.
The hospitals and drug companies will benefit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.