Home › Forums › Housing › The Pigs are Famous… OK act cool everybody, there a flood of new members on the horizon?
- This topic has 375 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by
paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 18, 2011 at 1:15 PM #669183February 18, 2011 at 1:20 PM #668038
Aecetia
ParticipantBoth sides like to paint it as an either or position. Pay public employees more or they will be laid off, when there are other alternatives to explore such as have public employees contributing more to their retirement or pick up more of their health care costs. Most private employees pay for a portion of their health care, etc. The old scare tactic of laying off police and fire is a tired old tactic.
February 18, 2011 at 1:20 PM #668099ParticipantBoth sides like to paint it as an either or position. Pay public employees more or they will be laid off, when there are other alternatives to explore such as have public employees contributing more to their retirement or pick up more of their health care costs. Most private employees pay for a portion of their health care, etc. The old scare tactic of laying off police and fire is a tired old tactic.
February 18, 2011 at 1:20 PM #668706ParticipantBoth sides like to paint it as an either or position. Pay public employees more or they will be laid off, when there are other alternatives to explore such as have public employees contributing more to their retirement or pick up more of their health care costs. Most private employees pay for a portion of their health care, etc. The old scare tactic of laying off police and fire is a tired old tactic.
February 18, 2011 at 1:20 PM #668845ParticipantBoth sides like to paint it as an either or position. Pay public employees more or they will be laid off, when there are other alternatives to explore such as have public employees contributing more to their retirement or pick up more of their health care costs. Most private employees pay for a portion of their health care, etc. The old scare tactic of laying off police and fire is a tired old tactic.
February 18, 2011 at 1:20 PM #669188ParticipantBoth sides like to paint it as an either or position. Pay public employees more or they will be laid off, when there are other alternatives to explore such as have public employees contributing more to their retirement or pick up more of their health care costs. Most private employees pay for a portion of their health care, etc. The old scare tactic of laying off police and fire is a tired old tactic.
February 18, 2011 at 2:26 PM #668058CA renter
Participant[quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?
February 18, 2011 at 2:26 PM #668120Participant[quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?
February 18, 2011 at 2:26 PM #668726Participant[quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?
February 18, 2011 at 2:26 PM #668865Participant[quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?
February 18, 2011 at 2:26 PM #669208Participant[quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?
February 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM #668078paramount
Participant[quote=CA renter][quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?[/quote]
Facts? I get all of my facts from John and Ken.
February 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM #668140Participant[quote=CA renter][quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?[/quote]
Facts? I get all of my facts from John and Ken.
February 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM #668746Participant[quote=CA renter][quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?[/quote]
Facts? I get all of my facts from John and Ken.
February 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM #668885Participant[quote=CA renter][quote=paramount]The argument above is just a preview of what you will be seeing more of in the next few months as public employee unions try to get the June $55 billion tax increase passed. They will also try to attach ’emotional’ type issues to the tax increase – probably something to do with children or parks or public safety.
I guarantee you the public employee unions have a think tank of con artists trying to figure out a scheme right at this very moment.[/quote]
Which part do you disagree with, and what facts or logic do you have to back up your assumptions?
Do you think govt contractors are exempt from these cutbacks?[/quote]
Facts? I get all of my facts from John and Ken.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.