- This topic has 135 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
no_such_reality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
December 14, 2007 at 5:48 PM #11208
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:13 PM #117347
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: What part of the Bay Area do you live in? I grew up in Mountain View and my dad worked in Palo Alto. Just curious.
I have a buddy of mine that works for Intel in Sta Clara and lives in Los Altos. He has been keeping an eye on the Bay Area market since 1995, and reporting on the various ups and downs (dot.com boom and bust, then housing bubble following).
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:21 PM #117362
raptorduck
ParticipantWell I live in San Jose, and have lived in Mountain View (twice) and Palo Alto, but the markets I looked at up here and continue to keep an eye on are Los Altos Hills, Los Altos, Atherton, Portola Valley, Woodside, Palo Alto, Saratoga, and Los Gatos, in that order.
Really I would want Los Altos Hills/Los Altos.
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:56 PM #117377
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: Well, geez, who wouldn’t? I love Los Altos and LAH, as well as Palo Alto Hills (near the country club).
I went to Saint Francis in Mountain View (off of Miramonte) and spent a considerable amount of time in Los Altos and LAH.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:19 AM #118921
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan: I used to live wallking distance from St. Francis. I also used to live in the Palo Alto Hills, above the country club at the 2,000 foot level on Page Mill. But RSF, Del Mar, Santaluz, La Jolla are in a different league than LA, LAH, or PA IMHO.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:26 AM #119026
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: I just visited St. Francis again over the Thanksgiving holiday. I travel up there with my family to visit San Francisco, and make my “pilgrimage” to Franny on the drive back to SoCal.
I cannot believe how big the high school is now, nor can I believe how much money they have sunk into performing and graphic arts.
Bear in mind, I graduated in 1983. When I graduated, we did not have a swimming pool (we had to use Awalt’s), and total enrollment was around 1,100 students. They are now building a $12MM theatre and performing arts center, next to the old one (which didn’t exist when I was there), and talking about “upgrading” the tech facilities to include direct connections to Stanford’s Computer Lab and Engineering Dept.
Times change.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:30 AM #119041
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan. I tried to get my daughter to go there, but she opted for Mt. View High. She is a freshman. My x-brother in law went to St. Francis and might have graduated in your class. I will check.
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:11 AM #119101
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor if you list your home, try to get in on the market in February if possible.
SD Realtor
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:31 AM #119136
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptor
Selling without owning another home would be very uncomfortable to our family. We did it in 2005 and often think of doing it again because we have built a relatively large sum in sweat equity. If my lot were not splittable, allowing me to protect at least some of the gains I might lose by staying here, we would be gone. I am not saying everyone should look at a windfall or asset protection in their personal residence this way, just saying I know it is a tough decision from having hashed it out a couple of times.Good luck.
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:31 AM #119269
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptor
Selling without owning another home would be very uncomfortable to our family. We did it in 2005 and often think of doing it again because we have built a relatively large sum in sweat equity. If my lot were not splittable, allowing me to protect at least some of the gains I might lose by staying here, we would be gone. I am not saying everyone should look at a windfall or asset protection in their personal residence this way, just saying I know it is a tough decision from having hashed it out a couple of times.Good luck.
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:31 AM #119302
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptor
Selling without owning another home would be very uncomfortable to our family. We did it in 2005 and often think of doing it again because we have built a relatively large sum in sweat equity. If my lot were not splittable, allowing me to protect at least some of the gains I might lose by staying here, we would be gone. I am not saying everyone should look at a windfall or asset protection in their personal residence this way, just saying I know it is a tough decision from having hashed it out a couple of times.Good luck.
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:31 AM #119344
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptor
Selling without owning another home would be very uncomfortable to our family. We did it in 2005 and often think of doing it again because we have built a relatively large sum in sweat equity. If my lot were not splittable, allowing me to protect at least some of the gains I might lose by staying here, we would be gone. I am not saying everyone should look at a windfall or asset protection in their personal residence this way, just saying I know it is a tough decision from having hashed it out a couple of times.Good luck.
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:31 AM #119365
NotCranky
ParticipantRaptor
Selling without owning another home would be very uncomfortable to our family. We did it in 2005 and often think of doing it again because we have built a relatively large sum in sweat equity. If my lot were not splittable, allowing me to protect at least some of the gains I might lose by staying here, we would be gone. I am not saying everyone should look at a windfall or asset protection in their personal residence this way, just saying I know it is a tough decision from having hashed it out a couple of times.Good luck.
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:11 AM #119235
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor if you list your home, try to get in on the market in February if possible.
SD Realtor
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:11 AM #119267
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor if you list your home, try to get in on the market in February if possible.
SD Realtor
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:11 AM #119309
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor if you list your home, try to get in on the market in February if possible.
SD Realtor
-
December 17, 2007 at 11:11 AM #119330
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor if you list your home, try to get in on the market in February if possible.
SD Realtor
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:30 AM #119175
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan. I tried to get my daughter to go there, but she opted for Mt. View High. She is a freshman. My x-brother in law went to St. Francis and might have graduated in your class. I will check.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:30 AM #119207
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan. I tried to get my daughter to go there, but she opted for Mt. View High. She is a freshman. My x-brother in law went to St. Francis and might have graduated in your class. I will check.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:30 AM #119248
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan. I tried to get my daughter to go there, but she opted for Mt. View High. She is a freshman. My x-brother in law went to St. Francis and might have graduated in your class. I will check.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:30 AM #119268
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan. I tried to get my daughter to go there, but she opted for Mt. View High. She is a freshman. My x-brother in law went to St. Francis and might have graduated in your class. I will check.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:26 AM #119159
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: I just visited St. Francis again over the Thanksgiving holiday. I travel up there with my family to visit San Francisco, and make my “pilgrimage” to Franny on the drive back to SoCal.
I cannot believe how big the high school is now, nor can I believe how much money they have sunk into performing and graphic arts.
Bear in mind, I graduated in 1983. When I graduated, we did not have a swimming pool (we had to use Awalt’s), and total enrollment was around 1,100 students. They are now building a $12MM theatre and performing arts center, next to the old one (which didn’t exist when I was there), and talking about “upgrading” the tech facilities to include direct connections to Stanford’s Computer Lab and Engineering Dept.
Times change.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:26 AM #119192
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: I just visited St. Francis again over the Thanksgiving holiday. I travel up there with my family to visit San Francisco, and make my “pilgrimage” to Franny on the drive back to SoCal.
I cannot believe how big the high school is now, nor can I believe how much money they have sunk into performing and graphic arts.
Bear in mind, I graduated in 1983. When I graduated, we did not have a swimming pool (we had to use Awalt’s), and total enrollment was around 1,100 students. They are now building a $12MM theatre and performing arts center, next to the old one (which didn’t exist when I was there), and talking about “upgrading” the tech facilities to include direct connections to Stanford’s Computer Lab and Engineering Dept.
Times change.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:26 AM #119234
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: I just visited St. Francis again over the Thanksgiving holiday. I travel up there with my family to visit San Francisco, and make my “pilgrimage” to Franny on the drive back to SoCal.
I cannot believe how big the high school is now, nor can I believe how much money they have sunk into performing and graphic arts.
Bear in mind, I graduated in 1983. When I graduated, we did not have a swimming pool (we had to use Awalt’s), and total enrollment was around 1,100 students. They are now building a $12MM theatre and performing arts center, next to the old one (which didn’t exist when I was there), and talking about “upgrading” the tech facilities to include direct connections to Stanford’s Computer Lab and Engineering Dept.
Times change.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:26 AM #119254
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: I just visited St. Francis again over the Thanksgiving holiday. I travel up there with my family to visit San Francisco, and make my “pilgrimage” to Franny on the drive back to SoCal.
I cannot believe how big the high school is now, nor can I believe how much money they have sunk into performing and graphic arts.
Bear in mind, I graduated in 1983. When I graduated, we did not have a swimming pool (we had to use Awalt’s), and total enrollment was around 1,100 students. They are now building a $12MM theatre and performing arts center, next to the old one (which didn’t exist when I was there), and talking about “upgrading” the tech facilities to include direct connections to Stanford’s Computer Lab and Engineering Dept.
Times change.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:19 AM #119053
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan: I used to live wallking distance from St. Francis. I also used to live in the Palo Alto Hills, above the country club at the 2,000 foot level on Page Mill. But RSF, Del Mar, Santaluz, La Jolla are in a different league than LA, LAH, or PA IMHO.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:19 AM #119087
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan: I used to live wallking distance from St. Francis. I also used to live in the Palo Alto Hills, above the country club at the 2,000 foot level on Page Mill. But RSF, Del Mar, Santaluz, La Jolla are in a different league than LA, LAH, or PA IMHO.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:19 AM #119130
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan: I used to live wallking distance from St. Francis. I also used to live in the Palo Alto Hills, above the country club at the 2,000 foot level on Page Mill. But RSF, Del Mar, Santaluz, La Jolla are in a different league than LA, LAH, or PA IMHO.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:19 AM #119150
raptorduck
ParticipantAllan: I used to live wallking distance from St. Francis. I also used to live in the Palo Alto Hills, above the country club at the 2,000 foot level on Page Mill. But RSF, Del Mar, Santaluz, La Jolla are in a different league than LA, LAH, or PA IMHO.
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:56 PM #117507
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: Well, geez, who wouldn’t? I love Los Altos and LAH, as well as Palo Alto Hills (near the country club).
I went to Saint Francis in Mountain View (off of Miramonte) and spent a considerable amount of time in Los Altos and LAH.
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:56 PM #117542
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: Well, geez, who wouldn’t? I love Los Altos and LAH, as well as Palo Alto Hills (near the country club).
I went to Saint Francis in Mountain View (off of Miramonte) and spent a considerable amount of time in Los Altos and LAH.
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:56 PM #117585
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: Well, geez, who wouldn’t? I love Los Altos and LAH, as well as Palo Alto Hills (near the country club).
I went to Saint Francis in Mountain View (off of Miramonte) and spent a considerable amount of time in Los Altos and LAH.
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:56 PM #117601
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: Well, geez, who wouldn’t? I love Los Altos and LAH, as well as Palo Alto Hills (near the country club).
I went to Saint Francis in Mountain View (off of Miramonte) and spent a considerable amount of time in Los Altos and LAH.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:10 PM #117382
nostradamus
ParticipantRaptorduck, I envy your financial position but what’s wrong with renting for a while in an area you like before making such a huge purchase? You know the market isn’t going up anytime soon, right? You KNOW this! So rent something like this in Rancho Santa Fe or something in Del Mar or La Jolla and sit on it for a year.
Some people are predicting 30% drops in prices, some even more. Let’s say you rent a rock-star home for $10k a month for one year. That’s $120k spent. On the other hand let’s say you bought the $3M (which is the low end of your “sweet spot”) home and the market goes down just 10%. You’ve lost $300k plus $30k in taxes plus all the other fees. Are you willing to unnecessarily pay $210k+ just to say “I own”? That’s what you’ll be doing in this down market.
There’s always buyer’s remorse. At least if you rent in an area for a while you’ll know it so well that once you buy there will be little remorse.
Now tell me, how did you make your millions??? If it’s true that you have all this money then you must have some sort of financial savvy and I can’t understand why you’d be considering buying in this down market. Is there something you know that us sub-multi-millionaires don’t? I’m not poor but I definitely have an appreciation for every dollar I make and wouldn’t consider throwing any away but it seems like this is something you’re ok with.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:19 PM #117398
Bugs
ParticipantIf it’s worth to you then it’s worth it to you. The Bay area has always had a much stronger income potential, and unlike SD County, that economy wasn’t driven solely by RE.
I liken it to comparing the increases in our ghetto vs. our high end neighborhoods. Yeah, the top end did okay during the runup, but it was the bottom end that more than tripled and it is the bottom end that is now racing in the opposite direction.
The Bay area is connected to the rest of the nation and it is just a matter of time before they also feel the pinch. During our runup the primary “reason” the bulls pointed to for explaining why prices couldn’t fall was “because it hasn’t happened yet.” Just as that line of reasoning proved incorrect in our area, I expect it to play out the same way in most other areas. The Bay area could turn out to be the exception, but I don’t see how unless there’s some big new wave in tech coming online.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:27 PM #117407
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBugs: I grew up there and have quite a few friends still there. Most of them are in Tech, and make good money, but I get the sense that the situation there is starting to deteriorate. Companies like Google will help prop the market up (take a look at home sales in Mountain View, Cupertino and Los Altos to get a sense of the “Google Effect” and the “Apple Effect”), but that can only last for so long.
Following the dot.bomb bust in 2000, I remember seeing neighborhoods in Mountain View lose 30% of their value over the next few years, so Bay Area housing is not immune.
I have been watching the San Francisco housing market (through SocketSite.com) and it is interesting to note two things: (1) The number of cancellations in downtown SF condo transactions, and (2) The slow declination of per square ft pricing of homes in the City of San Francisco proper. While these two events might signify nothing ultimately, they are indicators of a downward trend.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:32 PM #117428
Eugene
ParticipantI think that the housing market in Bay Area is starting to crumble along the edges, it’s just that the decline is not nearly as advanced as here in SD. Central areas like Mountain View or Los Altos are still holding well, but Vallejo and Livermore and Gilroy are disaster zones.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:32 PM #117558
Eugene
ParticipantI think that the housing market in Bay Area is starting to crumble along the edges, it’s just that the decline is not nearly as advanced as here in SD. Central areas like Mountain View or Los Altos are still holding well, but Vallejo and Livermore and Gilroy are disaster zones.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:32 PM #117592
Eugene
ParticipantI think that the housing market in Bay Area is starting to crumble along the edges, it’s just that the decline is not nearly as advanced as here in SD. Central areas like Mountain View or Los Altos are still holding well, but Vallejo and Livermore and Gilroy are disaster zones.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:32 PM #117635
Eugene
ParticipantI think that the housing market in Bay Area is starting to crumble along the edges, it’s just that the decline is not nearly as advanced as here in SD. Central areas like Mountain View or Los Altos are still holding well, but Vallejo and Livermore and Gilroy are disaster zones.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:32 PM #117651
Eugene
ParticipantI think that the housing market in Bay Area is starting to crumble along the edges, it’s just that the decline is not nearly as advanced as here in SD. Central areas like Mountain View or Los Altos are still holding well, but Vallejo and Livermore and Gilroy are disaster zones.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:38 PM #117433
NotCranky
ParticipantFrom what you have posted Raptor, If I were in your shoes I would sell regardless of any delays you may face in finding a house in North County San Diego. The market is obviously you friend as a seller there and San Diego appears to be your friend as a buyer within two years or less. You want to live here. No brainer. Sell and lease back for a while or relocate, do whatever it takes.
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:25 PM #117458
flyer
ParticipantRaptor
Most of my family and I live in RSF in what most would consider fabulous homes, and we would never consider paying what the “nouveau riche” have been shelling out for homes over the past 10 years to live in this great location. So, don’t worry, you’ll still be paying far more than the “old money” did for their homes. Everything in life is simply relative.
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:53 PM #117473
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor –
You have spent alot of time looking and researching. You have been diligent and whatever you decide to do, at least your decision will be informed. I will present two very brief arguments in each direction. My recommendation would be to do what Rus said which is sell yesterday and rent for the next 2 years. To continue
– You know I always preach about how a home is more then a simple asset. Again, you should buy a home to live in. If you can afford the home, (and in your case it sounds as if you do have some wealth) and if you can live in it without heavy financial concern, and if it will provide harmony for you and your family, then maybe it is a good decision to buy. If you truly are able to afford it, when you grow old and look back, will the money that you could have saved by waiting have made more of a difference in your life then the time you spent in the home with your family.
Which was more important not only to you, but to your family.
*****
– While I agree there are some who post with an extreme bearish mentality, most would agree that the properties that ran up the most, that were prone to the highest speculation will come down the hardest. While many of the areas you have looked at have not come down much, nor were they beset by heavy speculation, they will come down. It may be awhile but to think they are 100% immune is a fallacy. I think that if you could have some tangible proof that would help. Look the realtor you work with is most likely a full service broker who will not get a rebate right? So if you by a 1.5 or 2M place that brokerage is gonna get 45 or 60k right? So have your agent find you some tangible proof of declines of properties in that price range. I can tell you for a fact they are out there. Believe it or not even a foreclosure here and there. I know you may think this is out of the scope of showing me homes but your agent should be able to do this. The point is, if you see some of these places maybe that will give you more energy to hold off and rent for another year or two.
********
One last note… if you do have a property to sell and then you are also going to buy, you may not experience any windfall if the property you are going to sell does start to depreciate. So if that is the case then the entire argument I just presented for waiting is moot.
Again, I think selling now is something very serious to consider. Once you do that, then buying now verses not is something you need to wrestle with.
SD Realtor
-
December 15, 2007 at 5:58 AM #117624
Ex-SD
Participantraptorduck: Please send your email address to me at [email protected]
I have some information that I would like to pass on to you.
-
December 15, 2007 at 5:58 AM #117751
Ex-SD
Participantraptorduck: Please send your email address to me at [email protected]
I have some information that I would like to pass on to you.
-
December 15, 2007 at 5:58 AM #117786
Ex-SD
Participantraptorduck: Please send your email address to me at [email protected]
I have some information that I would like to pass on to you.
-
December 15, 2007 at 5:58 AM #117828
Ex-SD
Participantraptorduck: Please send your email address to me at [email protected]
I have some information that I would like to pass on to you.
-
December 15, 2007 at 5:58 AM #117850
Ex-SD
Participantraptorduck: Please send your email address to me at [email protected]
I have some information that I would like to pass on to you.
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:53 PM #117603
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor –
You have spent alot of time looking and researching. You have been diligent and whatever you decide to do, at least your decision will be informed. I will present two very brief arguments in each direction. My recommendation would be to do what Rus said which is sell yesterday and rent for the next 2 years. To continue
– You know I always preach about how a home is more then a simple asset. Again, you should buy a home to live in. If you can afford the home, (and in your case it sounds as if you do have some wealth) and if you can live in it without heavy financial concern, and if it will provide harmony for you and your family, then maybe it is a good decision to buy. If you truly are able to afford it, when you grow old and look back, will the money that you could have saved by waiting have made more of a difference in your life then the time you spent in the home with your family.
Which was more important not only to you, but to your family.
*****
– While I agree there are some who post with an extreme bearish mentality, most would agree that the properties that ran up the most, that were prone to the highest speculation will come down the hardest. While many of the areas you have looked at have not come down much, nor were they beset by heavy speculation, they will come down. It may be awhile but to think they are 100% immune is a fallacy. I think that if you could have some tangible proof that would help. Look the realtor you work with is most likely a full service broker who will not get a rebate right? So if you by a 1.5 or 2M place that brokerage is gonna get 45 or 60k right? So have your agent find you some tangible proof of declines of properties in that price range. I can tell you for a fact they are out there. Believe it or not even a foreclosure here and there. I know you may think this is out of the scope of showing me homes but your agent should be able to do this. The point is, if you see some of these places maybe that will give you more energy to hold off and rent for another year or two.
********
One last note… if you do have a property to sell and then you are also going to buy, you may not experience any windfall if the property you are going to sell does start to depreciate. So if that is the case then the entire argument I just presented for waiting is moot.
Again, I think selling now is something very serious to consider. Once you do that, then buying now verses not is something you need to wrestle with.
SD Realtor
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:53 PM #117637
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor –
You have spent alot of time looking and researching. You have been diligent and whatever you decide to do, at least your decision will be informed. I will present two very brief arguments in each direction. My recommendation would be to do what Rus said which is sell yesterday and rent for the next 2 years. To continue
– You know I always preach about how a home is more then a simple asset. Again, you should buy a home to live in. If you can afford the home, (and in your case it sounds as if you do have some wealth) and if you can live in it without heavy financial concern, and if it will provide harmony for you and your family, then maybe it is a good decision to buy. If you truly are able to afford it, when you grow old and look back, will the money that you could have saved by waiting have made more of a difference in your life then the time you spent in the home with your family.
Which was more important not only to you, but to your family.
*****
– While I agree there are some who post with an extreme bearish mentality, most would agree that the properties that ran up the most, that were prone to the highest speculation will come down the hardest. While many of the areas you have looked at have not come down much, nor were they beset by heavy speculation, they will come down. It may be awhile but to think they are 100% immune is a fallacy. I think that if you could have some tangible proof that would help. Look the realtor you work with is most likely a full service broker who will not get a rebate right? So if you by a 1.5 or 2M place that brokerage is gonna get 45 or 60k right? So have your agent find you some tangible proof of declines of properties in that price range. I can tell you for a fact they are out there. Believe it or not even a foreclosure here and there. I know you may think this is out of the scope of showing me homes but your agent should be able to do this. The point is, if you see some of these places maybe that will give you more energy to hold off and rent for another year or two.
********
One last note… if you do have a property to sell and then you are also going to buy, you may not experience any windfall if the property you are going to sell does start to depreciate. So if that is the case then the entire argument I just presented for waiting is moot.
Again, I think selling now is something very serious to consider. Once you do that, then buying now verses not is something you need to wrestle with.
SD Realtor
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:53 PM #117679
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor –
You have spent alot of time looking and researching. You have been diligent and whatever you decide to do, at least your decision will be informed. I will present two very brief arguments in each direction. My recommendation would be to do what Rus said which is sell yesterday and rent for the next 2 years. To continue
– You know I always preach about how a home is more then a simple asset. Again, you should buy a home to live in. If you can afford the home, (and in your case it sounds as if you do have some wealth) and if you can live in it without heavy financial concern, and if it will provide harmony for you and your family, then maybe it is a good decision to buy. If you truly are able to afford it, when you grow old and look back, will the money that you could have saved by waiting have made more of a difference in your life then the time you spent in the home with your family.
Which was more important not only to you, but to your family.
*****
– While I agree there are some who post with an extreme bearish mentality, most would agree that the properties that ran up the most, that were prone to the highest speculation will come down the hardest. While many of the areas you have looked at have not come down much, nor were they beset by heavy speculation, they will come down. It may be awhile but to think they are 100% immune is a fallacy. I think that if you could have some tangible proof that would help. Look the realtor you work with is most likely a full service broker who will not get a rebate right? So if you by a 1.5 or 2M place that brokerage is gonna get 45 or 60k right? So have your agent find you some tangible proof of declines of properties in that price range. I can tell you for a fact they are out there. Believe it or not even a foreclosure here and there. I know you may think this is out of the scope of showing me homes but your agent should be able to do this. The point is, if you see some of these places maybe that will give you more energy to hold off and rent for another year or two.
********
One last note… if you do have a property to sell and then you are also going to buy, you may not experience any windfall if the property you are going to sell does start to depreciate. So if that is the case then the entire argument I just presented for waiting is moot.
Again, I think selling now is something very serious to consider. Once you do that, then buying now verses not is something you need to wrestle with.
SD Realtor
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:53 PM #117697
SD Realtor
ParticipantRaptor –
You have spent alot of time looking and researching. You have been diligent and whatever you decide to do, at least your decision will be informed. I will present two very brief arguments in each direction. My recommendation would be to do what Rus said which is sell yesterday and rent for the next 2 years. To continue
– You know I always preach about how a home is more then a simple asset. Again, you should buy a home to live in. If you can afford the home, (and in your case it sounds as if you do have some wealth) and if you can live in it without heavy financial concern, and if it will provide harmony for you and your family, then maybe it is a good decision to buy. If you truly are able to afford it, when you grow old and look back, will the money that you could have saved by waiting have made more of a difference in your life then the time you spent in the home with your family.
Which was more important not only to you, but to your family.
*****
– While I agree there are some who post with an extreme bearish mentality, most would agree that the properties that ran up the most, that were prone to the highest speculation will come down the hardest. While many of the areas you have looked at have not come down much, nor were they beset by heavy speculation, they will come down. It may be awhile but to think they are 100% immune is a fallacy. I think that if you could have some tangible proof that would help. Look the realtor you work with is most likely a full service broker who will not get a rebate right? So if you by a 1.5 or 2M place that brokerage is gonna get 45 or 60k right? So have your agent find you some tangible proof of declines of properties in that price range. I can tell you for a fact they are out there. Believe it or not even a foreclosure here and there. I know you may think this is out of the scope of showing me homes but your agent should be able to do this. The point is, if you see some of these places maybe that will give you more energy to hold off and rent for another year or two.
********
One last note… if you do have a property to sell and then you are also going to buy, you may not experience any windfall if the property you are going to sell does start to depreciate. So if that is the case then the entire argument I just presented for waiting is moot.
Again, I think selling now is something very serious to consider. Once you do that, then buying now verses not is something you need to wrestle with.
SD Realtor
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:25 PM #117588
flyer
ParticipantRaptor
Most of my family and I live in RSF in what most would consider fabulous homes, and we would never consider paying what the “nouveau riche” have been shelling out for homes over the past 10 years to live in this great location. So, don’t worry, you’ll still be paying far more than the “old money” did for their homes. Everything in life is simply relative.
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:25 PM #117622
flyer
ParticipantRaptor
Most of my family and I live in RSF in what most would consider fabulous homes, and we would never consider paying what the “nouveau riche” have been shelling out for homes over the past 10 years to live in this great location. So, don’t worry, you’ll still be paying far more than the “old money” did for their homes. Everything in life is simply relative.
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:25 PM #117664
flyer
ParticipantRaptor
Most of my family and I live in RSF in what most would consider fabulous homes, and we would never consider paying what the “nouveau riche” have been shelling out for homes over the past 10 years to live in this great location. So, don’t worry, you’ll still be paying far more than the “old money” did for their homes. Everything in life is simply relative.
-
December 14, 2007 at 10:25 PM #117681
flyer
ParticipantRaptor
Most of my family and I live in RSF in what most would consider fabulous homes, and we would never consider paying what the “nouveau riche” have been shelling out for homes over the past 10 years to live in this great location. So, don’t worry, you’ll still be paying far more than the “old money” did for their homes. Everything in life is simply relative.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:30 AM #118936
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. Very good advice as always. I am struggling with that very idea at the moment to just put my house for sale in March.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:30 AM #119067
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. Very good advice as always. I am struggling with that very idea at the moment to just put my house for sale in March.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:30 AM #119102
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. Very good advice as always. I am struggling with that very idea at the moment to just put my house for sale in March.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:30 AM #119144
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. Very good advice as always. I am struggling with that very idea at the moment to just put my house for sale in March.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:30 AM #119163
raptorduck
ParticipantRustico. Very good advice as always. I am struggling with that very idea at the moment to just put my house for sale in March.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:38 PM #117563
NotCranky
ParticipantFrom what you have posted Raptor, If I were in your shoes I would sell regardless of any delays you may face in finding a house in North County San Diego. The market is obviously you friend as a seller there and San Diego appears to be your friend as a buyer within two years or less. You want to live here. No brainer. Sell and lease back for a while or relocate, do whatever it takes.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:38 PM #117597
NotCranky
ParticipantFrom what you have posted Raptor, If I were in your shoes I would sell regardless of any delays you may face in finding a house in North County San Diego. The market is obviously you friend as a seller there and San Diego appears to be your friend as a buyer within two years or less. You want to live here. No brainer. Sell and lease back for a while or relocate, do whatever it takes.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:38 PM #117639
NotCranky
ParticipantFrom what you have posted Raptor, If I were in your shoes I would sell regardless of any delays you may face in finding a house in North County San Diego. The market is obviously you friend as a seller there and San Diego appears to be your friend as a buyer within two years or less. You want to live here. No brainer. Sell and lease back for a while or relocate, do whatever it takes.
-
December 14, 2007 at 8:38 PM #117656
NotCranky
ParticipantFrom what you have posted Raptor, If I were in your shoes I would sell regardless of any delays you may face in finding a house in North County San Diego. The market is obviously you friend as a seller there and San Diego appears to be your friend as a buyer within two years or less. You want to live here. No brainer. Sell and lease back for a while or relocate, do whatever it takes.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:27 PM #117538
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBugs: I grew up there and have quite a few friends still there. Most of them are in Tech, and make good money, but I get the sense that the situation there is starting to deteriorate. Companies like Google will help prop the market up (take a look at home sales in Mountain View, Cupertino and Los Altos to get a sense of the “Google Effect” and the “Apple Effect”), but that can only last for so long.
Following the dot.bomb bust in 2000, I remember seeing neighborhoods in Mountain View lose 30% of their value over the next few years, so Bay Area housing is not immune.
I have been watching the San Francisco housing market (through SocketSite.com) and it is interesting to note two things: (1) The number of cancellations in downtown SF condo transactions, and (2) The slow declination of per square ft pricing of homes in the City of San Francisco proper. While these two events might signify nothing ultimately, they are indicators of a downward trend.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:27 PM #117572
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBugs: I grew up there and have quite a few friends still there. Most of them are in Tech, and make good money, but I get the sense that the situation there is starting to deteriorate. Companies like Google will help prop the market up (take a look at home sales in Mountain View, Cupertino and Los Altos to get a sense of the “Google Effect” and the “Apple Effect”), but that can only last for so long.
Following the dot.bomb bust in 2000, I remember seeing neighborhoods in Mountain View lose 30% of their value over the next few years, so Bay Area housing is not immune.
I have been watching the San Francisco housing market (through SocketSite.com) and it is interesting to note two things: (1) The number of cancellations in downtown SF condo transactions, and (2) The slow declination of per square ft pricing of homes in the City of San Francisco proper. While these two events might signify nothing ultimately, they are indicators of a downward trend.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:27 PM #117615
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBugs: I grew up there and have quite a few friends still there. Most of them are in Tech, and make good money, but I get the sense that the situation there is starting to deteriorate. Companies like Google will help prop the market up (take a look at home sales in Mountain View, Cupertino and Los Altos to get a sense of the “Google Effect” and the “Apple Effect”), but that can only last for so long.
Following the dot.bomb bust in 2000, I remember seeing neighborhoods in Mountain View lose 30% of their value over the next few years, so Bay Area housing is not immune.
I have been watching the San Francisco housing market (through SocketSite.com) and it is interesting to note two things: (1) The number of cancellations in downtown SF condo transactions, and (2) The slow declination of per square ft pricing of homes in the City of San Francisco proper. While these two events might signify nothing ultimately, they are indicators of a downward trend.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:27 PM #117631
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBugs: I grew up there and have quite a few friends still there. Most of them are in Tech, and make good money, but I get the sense that the situation there is starting to deteriorate. Companies like Google will help prop the market up (take a look at home sales in Mountain View, Cupertino and Los Altos to get a sense of the “Google Effect” and the “Apple Effect”), but that can only last for so long.
Following the dot.bomb bust in 2000, I remember seeing neighborhoods in Mountain View lose 30% of their value over the next few years, so Bay Area housing is not immune.
I have been watching the San Francisco housing market (through SocketSite.com) and it is interesting to note two things: (1) The number of cancellations in downtown SF condo transactions, and (2) The slow declination of per square ft pricing of homes in the City of San Francisco proper. While these two events might signify nothing ultimately, they are indicators of a downward trend.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:19 PM #117528
Bugs
ParticipantIf it’s worth to you then it’s worth it to you. The Bay area has always had a much stronger income potential, and unlike SD County, that economy wasn’t driven solely by RE.
I liken it to comparing the increases in our ghetto vs. our high end neighborhoods. Yeah, the top end did okay during the runup, but it was the bottom end that more than tripled and it is the bottom end that is now racing in the opposite direction.
The Bay area is connected to the rest of the nation and it is just a matter of time before they also feel the pinch. During our runup the primary “reason” the bulls pointed to for explaining why prices couldn’t fall was “because it hasn’t happened yet.” Just as that line of reasoning proved incorrect in our area, I expect it to play out the same way in most other areas. The Bay area could turn out to be the exception, but I don’t see how unless there’s some big new wave in tech coming online.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:19 PM #117562
Bugs
ParticipantIf it’s worth to you then it’s worth it to you. The Bay area has always had a much stronger income potential, and unlike SD County, that economy wasn’t driven solely by RE.
I liken it to comparing the increases in our ghetto vs. our high end neighborhoods. Yeah, the top end did okay during the runup, but it was the bottom end that more than tripled and it is the bottom end that is now racing in the opposite direction.
The Bay area is connected to the rest of the nation and it is just a matter of time before they also feel the pinch. During our runup the primary “reason” the bulls pointed to for explaining why prices couldn’t fall was “because it hasn’t happened yet.” Just as that line of reasoning proved incorrect in our area, I expect it to play out the same way in most other areas. The Bay area could turn out to be the exception, but I don’t see how unless there’s some big new wave in tech coming online.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:19 PM #117605
Bugs
ParticipantIf it’s worth to you then it’s worth it to you. The Bay area has always had a much stronger income potential, and unlike SD County, that economy wasn’t driven solely by RE.
I liken it to comparing the increases in our ghetto vs. our high end neighborhoods. Yeah, the top end did okay during the runup, but it was the bottom end that more than tripled and it is the bottom end that is now racing in the opposite direction.
The Bay area is connected to the rest of the nation and it is just a matter of time before they also feel the pinch. During our runup the primary “reason” the bulls pointed to for explaining why prices couldn’t fall was “because it hasn’t happened yet.” Just as that line of reasoning proved incorrect in our area, I expect it to play out the same way in most other areas. The Bay area could turn out to be the exception, but I don’t see how unless there’s some big new wave in tech coming online.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:19 PM #117621
Bugs
ParticipantIf it’s worth to you then it’s worth it to you. The Bay area has always had a much stronger income potential, and unlike SD County, that economy wasn’t driven solely by RE.
I liken it to comparing the increases in our ghetto vs. our high end neighborhoods. Yeah, the top end did okay during the runup, but it was the bottom end that more than tripled and it is the bottom end that is now racing in the opposite direction.
The Bay area is connected to the rest of the nation and it is just a matter of time before they also feel the pinch. During our runup the primary “reason” the bulls pointed to for explaining why prices couldn’t fall was “because it hasn’t happened yet.” Just as that line of reasoning proved incorrect in our area, I expect it to play out the same way in most other areas. The Bay area could turn out to be the exception, but I don’t see how unless there’s some big new wave in tech coming online.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:33 AM #118931
raptorduck
ParticipantNostradamus. I am not rich. I know a lot of rich people, so I can tell the difference. I ain’t one of them. I have been lucky with money and have a job that pays very well, but that is about it. I just went to school and got a lot of degrees and do something not many people can do where there is lots of demand for it globally. Nothing brilliant about that. Just common sense marketing.
I am no financial wiz kid and certainly not financially talented enough to be giving advice to folks. I know no more than an MBA who also has an economics degree. I live below my means so don’t tend to carry debt other than a mortgage, which as a rule should be no more than 33% of the value of my house after 5 years for me. That is all the savy I have. The rest is dumb is as dumb does.
Look, I owned Enron and Worldcom stock when the market tanked and a lot of it. Don’t look to me for financial or real estate advice. Why do you think I joined this board? I am an expert in some things, but not these.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:19 AM #119011
nostradamus
ParticipantI wouldn’t call you dumb at all but I can’t believe an MBA with a degree in economics doesn’t feel comfortable giving financial advice. I admire your humility. I wish Greenspan and Bernanke were less comfortable giving financial advice!
Anyhow, I guess your definition of rich is not only in financial terms.
It sounds like you’ve been very smart and made it through some interesting times. In another decade or so you can look back and say “I made it through the Enron/Worldcom crash and I sat tight during the biggest housing bubble in history”.
The housing bubble was good for me in one way: it made me save during these years and really learn a lot about housing valuation.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:19 AM #119143
nostradamus
ParticipantI wouldn’t call you dumb at all but I can’t believe an MBA with a degree in economics doesn’t feel comfortable giving financial advice. I admire your humility. I wish Greenspan and Bernanke were less comfortable giving financial advice!
Anyhow, I guess your definition of rich is not only in financial terms.
It sounds like you’ve been very smart and made it through some interesting times. In another decade or so you can look back and say “I made it through the Enron/Worldcom crash and I sat tight during the biggest housing bubble in history”.
The housing bubble was good for me in one way: it made me save during these years and really learn a lot about housing valuation.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:19 AM #119177
nostradamus
ParticipantI wouldn’t call you dumb at all but I can’t believe an MBA with a degree in economics doesn’t feel comfortable giving financial advice. I admire your humility. I wish Greenspan and Bernanke were less comfortable giving financial advice!
Anyhow, I guess your definition of rich is not only in financial terms.
It sounds like you’ve been very smart and made it through some interesting times. In another decade or so you can look back and say “I made it through the Enron/Worldcom crash and I sat tight during the biggest housing bubble in history”.
The housing bubble was good for me in one way: it made me save during these years and really learn a lot about housing valuation.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:19 AM #119219
nostradamus
ParticipantI wouldn’t call you dumb at all but I can’t believe an MBA with a degree in economics doesn’t feel comfortable giving financial advice. I admire your humility. I wish Greenspan and Bernanke were less comfortable giving financial advice!
Anyhow, I guess your definition of rich is not only in financial terms.
It sounds like you’ve been very smart and made it through some interesting times. In another decade or so you can look back and say “I made it through the Enron/Worldcom crash and I sat tight during the biggest housing bubble in history”.
The housing bubble was good for me in one way: it made me save during these years and really learn a lot about housing valuation.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:19 AM #119240
nostradamus
ParticipantI wouldn’t call you dumb at all but I can’t believe an MBA with a degree in economics doesn’t feel comfortable giving financial advice. I admire your humility. I wish Greenspan and Bernanke were less comfortable giving financial advice!
Anyhow, I guess your definition of rich is not only in financial terms.
It sounds like you’ve been very smart and made it through some interesting times. In another decade or so you can look back and say “I made it through the Enron/Worldcom crash and I sat tight during the biggest housing bubble in history”.
The housing bubble was good for me in one way: it made me save during these years and really learn a lot about housing valuation.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:33 AM #119062
raptorduck
ParticipantNostradamus. I am not rich. I know a lot of rich people, so I can tell the difference. I ain’t one of them. I have been lucky with money and have a job that pays very well, but that is about it. I just went to school and got a lot of degrees and do something not many people can do where there is lots of demand for it globally. Nothing brilliant about that. Just common sense marketing.
I am no financial wiz kid and certainly not financially talented enough to be giving advice to folks. I know no more than an MBA who also has an economics degree. I live below my means so don’t tend to carry debt other than a mortgage, which as a rule should be no more than 33% of the value of my house after 5 years for me. That is all the savy I have. The rest is dumb is as dumb does.
Look, I owned Enron and Worldcom stock when the market tanked and a lot of it. Don’t look to me for financial or real estate advice. Why do you think I joined this board? I am an expert in some things, but not these.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:33 AM #119097
raptorduck
ParticipantNostradamus. I am not rich. I know a lot of rich people, so I can tell the difference. I ain’t one of them. I have been lucky with money and have a job that pays very well, but that is about it. I just went to school and got a lot of degrees and do something not many people can do where there is lots of demand for it globally. Nothing brilliant about that. Just common sense marketing.
I am no financial wiz kid and certainly not financially talented enough to be giving advice to folks. I know no more than an MBA who also has an economics degree. I live below my means so don’t tend to carry debt other than a mortgage, which as a rule should be no more than 33% of the value of my house after 5 years for me. That is all the savy I have. The rest is dumb is as dumb does.
Look, I owned Enron and Worldcom stock when the market tanked and a lot of it. Don’t look to me for financial or real estate advice. Why do you think I joined this board? I am an expert in some things, but not these.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:33 AM #119139
raptorduck
ParticipantNostradamus. I am not rich. I know a lot of rich people, so I can tell the difference. I ain’t one of them. I have been lucky with money and have a job that pays very well, but that is about it. I just went to school and got a lot of degrees and do something not many people can do where there is lots of demand for it globally. Nothing brilliant about that. Just common sense marketing.
I am no financial wiz kid and certainly not financially talented enough to be giving advice to folks. I know no more than an MBA who also has an economics degree. I live below my means so don’t tend to carry debt other than a mortgage, which as a rule should be no more than 33% of the value of my house after 5 years for me. That is all the savy I have. The rest is dumb is as dumb does.
Look, I owned Enron and Worldcom stock when the market tanked and a lot of it. Don’t look to me for financial or real estate advice. Why do you think I joined this board? I am an expert in some things, but not these.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:33 AM #119158
raptorduck
ParticipantNostradamus. I am not rich. I know a lot of rich people, so I can tell the difference. I ain’t one of them. I have been lucky with money and have a job that pays very well, but that is about it. I just went to school and got a lot of degrees and do something not many people can do where there is lots of demand for it globally. Nothing brilliant about that. Just common sense marketing.
I am no financial wiz kid and certainly not financially talented enough to be giving advice to folks. I know no more than an MBA who also has an economics degree. I live below my means so don’t tend to carry debt other than a mortgage, which as a rule should be no more than 33% of the value of my house after 5 years for me. That is all the savy I have. The rest is dumb is as dumb does.
Look, I owned Enron and Worldcom stock when the market tanked and a lot of it. Don’t look to me for financial or real estate advice. Why do you think I joined this board? I am an expert in some things, but not these.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:10 PM #117512
nostradamus
ParticipantRaptorduck, I envy your financial position but what’s wrong with renting for a while in an area you like before making such a huge purchase? You know the market isn’t going up anytime soon, right? You KNOW this! So rent something like this in Rancho Santa Fe or something in Del Mar or La Jolla and sit on it for a year.
Some people are predicting 30% drops in prices, some even more. Let’s say you rent a rock-star home for $10k a month for one year. That’s $120k spent. On the other hand let’s say you bought the $3M (which is the low end of your “sweet spot”) home and the market goes down just 10%. You’ve lost $300k plus $30k in taxes plus all the other fees. Are you willing to unnecessarily pay $210k+ just to say “I own”? That’s what you’ll be doing in this down market.
There’s always buyer’s remorse. At least if you rent in an area for a while you’ll know it so well that once you buy there will be little remorse.
Now tell me, how did you make your millions??? If it’s true that you have all this money then you must have some sort of financial savvy and I can’t understand why you’d be considering buying in this down market. Is there something you know that us sub-multi-millionaires don’t? I’m not poor but I definitely have an appreciation for every dollar I make and wouldn’t consider throwing any away but it seems like this is something you’re ok with.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:10 PM #117547
nostradamus
ParticipantRaptorduck, I envy your financial position but what’s wrong with renting for a while in an area you like before making such a huge purchase? You know the market isn’t going up anytime soon, right? You KNOW this! So rent something like this in Rancho Santa Fe or something in Del Mar or La Jolla and sit on it for a year.
Some people are predicting 30% drops in prices, some even more. Let’s say you rent a rock-star home for $10k a month for one year. That’s $120k spent. On the other hand let’s say you bought the $3M (which is the low end of your “sweet spot”) home and the market goes down just 10%. You’ve lost $300k plus $30k in taxes plus all the other fees. Are you willing to unnecessarily pay $210k+ just to say “I own”? That’s what you’ll be doing in this down market.
There’s always buyer’s remorse. At least if you rent in an area for a while you’ll know it so well that once you buy there will be little remorse.
Now tell me, how did you make your millions??? If it’s true that you have all this money then you must have some sort of financial savvy and I can’t understand why you’d be considering buying in this down market. Is there something you know that us sub-multi-millionaires don’t? I’m not poor but I definitely have an appreciation for every dollar I make and wouldn’t consider throwing any away but it seems like this is something you’re ok with.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:10 PM #117590
nostradamus
ParticipantRaptorduck, I envy your financial position but what’s wrong with renting for a while in an area you like before making such a huge purchase? You know the market isn’t going up anytime soon, right? You KNOW this! So rent something like this in Rancho Santa Fe or something in Del Mar or La Jolla and sit on it for a year.
Some people are predicting 30% drops in prices, some even more. Let’s say you rent a rock-star home for $10k a month for one year. That’s $120k spent. On the other hand let’s say you bought the $3M (which is the low end of your “sweet spot”) home and the market goes down just 10%. You’ve lost $300k plus $30k in taxes plus all the other fees. Are you willing to unnecessarily pay $210k+ just to say “I own”? That’s what you’ll be doing in this down market.
There’s always buyer’s remorse. At least if you rent in an area for a while you’ll know it so well that once you buy there will be little remorse.
Now tell me, how did you make your millions??? If it’s true that you have all this money then you must have some sort of financial savvy and I can’t understand why you’d be considering buying in this down market. Is there something you know that us sub-multi-millionaires don’t? I’m not poor but I definitely have an appreciation for every dollar I make and wouldn’t consider throwing any away but it seems like this is something you’re ok with.
-
December 14, 2007 at 7:10 PM #117606
nostradamus
ParticipantRaptorduck, I envy your financial position but what’s wrong with renting for a while in an area you like before making such a huge purchase? You know the market isn’t going up anytime soon, right? You KNOW this! So rent something like this in Rancho Santa Fe or something in Del Mar or La Jolla and sit on it for a year.
Some people are predicting 30% drops in prices, some even more. Let’s say you rent a rock-star home for $10k a month for one year. That’s $120k spent. On the other hand let’s say you bought the $3M (which is the low end of your “sweet spot”) home and the market goes down just 10%. You’ve lost $300k plus $30k in taxes plus all the other fees. Are you willing to unnecessarily pay $210k+ just to say “I own”? That’s what you’ll be doing in this down market.
There’s always buyer’s remorse. At least if you rent in an area for a while you’ll know it so well that once you buy there will be little remorse.
Now tell me, how did you make your millions??? If it’s true that you have all this money then you must have some sort of financial savvy and I can’t understand why you’d be considering buying in this down market. Is there something you know that us sub-multi-millionaires don’t? I’m not poor but I definitely have an appreciation for every dollar I make and wouldn’t consider throwing any away but it seems like this is something you’re ok with.
-
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:21 PM #117492
raptorduck
ParticipantWell I live in San Jose, and have lived in Mountain View (twice) and Palo Alto, but the markets I looked at up here and continue to keep an eye on are Los Altos Hills, Los Altos, Atherton, Portola Valley, Woodside, Palo Alto, Saratoga, and Los Gatos, in that order.
Really I would want Los Altos Hills/Los Altos.
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:21 PM #117527
raptorduck
ParticipantWell I live in San Jose, and have lived in Mountain View (twice) and Palo Alto, but the markets I looked at up here and continue to keep an eye on are Los Altos Hills, Los Altos, Atherton, Portola Valley, Woodside, Palo Alto, Saratoga, and Los Gatos, in that order.
Really I would want Los Altos Hills/Los Altos.
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:21 PM #117570
raptorduck
ParticipantWell I live in San Jose, and have lived in Mountain View (twice) and Palo Alto, but the markets I looked at up here and continue to keep an eye on are Los Altos Hills, Los Altos, Atherton, Portola Valley, Woodside, Palo Alto, Saratoga, and Los Gatos, in that order.
Really I would want Los Altos Hills/Los Altos.
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:21 PM #117586
raptorduck
ParticipantWell I live in San Jose, and have lived in Mountain View (twice) and Palo Alto, but the markets I looked at up here and continue to keep an eye on are Los Altos Hills, Los Altos, Atherton, Portola Valley, Woodside, Palo Alto, Saratoga, and Los Gatos, in that order.
Really I would want Los Altos Hills/Los Altos.
-
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:13 PM #117477
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: What part of the Bay Area do you live in? I grew up in Mountain View and my dad worked in Palo Alto. Just curious.
I have a buddy of mine that works for Intel in Sta Clara and lives in Los Altos. He has been keeping an eye on the Bay Area market since 1995, and reporting on the various ups and downs (dot.com boom and bust, then housing bubble following).
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:13 PM #117511
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: What part of the Bay Area do you live in? I grew up in Mountain View and my dad worked in Palo Alto. Just curious.
I have a buddy of mine that works for Intel in Sta Clara and lives in Los Altos. He has been keeping an eye on the Bay Area market since 1995, and reporting on the various ups and downs (dot.com boom and bust, then housing bubble following).
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:13 PM #117554
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: What part of the Bay Area do you live in? I grew up in Mountain View and my dad worked in Palo Alto. Just curious.
I have a buddy of mine that works for Intel in Sta Clara and lives in Los Altos. He has been keeping an eye on the Bay Area market since 1995, and reporting on the various ups and downs (dot.com boom and bust, then housing bubble following).
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:13 PM #117571
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantraptorduck: What part of the Bay Area do you live in? I grew up in Mountain View and my dad worked in Palo Alto. Just curious.
I have a buddy of mine that works for Intel in Sta Clara and lives in Los Altos. He has been keeping an eye on the Bay Area market since 1995, and reporting on the various ups and downs (dot.com boom and bust, then housing bubble following).
-
December 17, 2007 at 1:33 PM #119166
asragov
ParticipantWhile I am in no way a bull on home prices, I thought that this latest housing valuation report from National City Bancorp was interesting.
They show San Diego as being overvalued by only about 8% – other areas of California much more so. There are obviously big issues with median price, variation within an area, etc. etc., but it is interesting since it has so much history and so many cities.
Raptorduck, you could probably find data to justify nearly anything. In any case:
http://www.nationalcity.com/corporate/EconomicInsight/HousingValuation/default.asp
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:13 PM #119405
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantasragov –
Looking at the charts you linked from NationalCity Bancorp it looks like the SD area went to undervalued in about 1992, about 4 years from the price bottom. Although, prices may hit their metric of properly valued, they will likely swing below it for a period of time. I’d guess their metric will at least reach negative 5% to neg. 10% before it will have bottomed.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:18 PM #119410
Arraya
ParticipantFrom a purely theoretical standpoint, house prices need to fall to match those at the start of the bubble in 2000. Why? Because otherwise we have to believe in The Free Lunch. For The Free Lunch to be true it must be possible for a person to buy a house, do nothing except sit on a couch drinking beer for the next 5 years and get rich in the process. Examining 70 past examples of asset bubbles we find that The Free Lunch has never worked before and it’s very unlikely to work this time either.
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/martenson/2007/1217.html
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:42 PM #119430
sdrealtor
ParticipantAhem, its 2007 now so it would have to be 7 years. BTW, how much does one get paid for sitting on the couch and drinking beer? Enough to pay that mortgage for 7 years?
BTW, based upon a 30 yr fixed rate around 6%, one would have to come up with payments totaling in excess of 50% of their principal over 7 years.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:30 AM #119498
raptorduck
Participant“You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Is all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? Is that what you want me to tell my mother? And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. Are you on drugs? That’s it, I am going to my mother’s!”
I swear I thought I asked my wife previously about possibly renting. I did didn’t I? I must have shared that with you guys in the past. Tell me I did. This was essentially the response I got last night when I suggested we consdider renting. It was like I never brought it up before. I know I did. I am sure I did.
It was in the context of selling our current house before we buy a new one. The logic of that did not stand a chance once I used the “R” word.
I am typing with a high pitch key stroke in real time and can hardly walk. I am not sure I physically able to continue to populate the planet after that reaction. I need medical attention.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:47 AM #119503
NotCranky
ParticipantMan,sorry to hear that. Sounds awful. We had a few like, that,not over renting but taking my wife out of the city. I suggested Arkansas, her suburban San Diego. We moved to east county, which is a pretty good compromise.I hope you two can find a compromise.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:47 AM #119638
NotCranky
ParticipantMan,sorry to hear that. Sounds awful. We had a few like, that,not over renting but taking my wife out of the city. I suggested Arkansas, her suburban San Diego. We moved to east county, which is a pretty good compromise.I hope you two can find a compromise.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:47 AM #119671
NotCranky
ParticipantMan,sorry to hear that. Sounds awful. We had a few like, that,not over renting but taking my wife out of the city. I suggested Arkansas, her suburban San Diego. We moved to east county, which is a pretty good compromise.I hope you two can find a compromise.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:47 AM #119717
NotCranky
ParticipantMan,sorry to hear that. Sounds awful. We had a few like, that,not over renting but taking my wife out of the city. I suggested Arkansas, her suburban San Diego. We moved to east county, which is a pretty good compromise.I hope you two can find a compromise.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:47 AM #119735
NotCranky
ParticipantMan,sorry to hear that. Sounds awful. We had a few like, that,not over renting but taking my wife out of the city. I suggested Arkansas, her suburban San Diego. We moved to east county, which is a pretty good compromise.I hope you two can find a compromise.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:56 AM #119554
no_such_reality
ParticipantOuch, well, you can break her of the what are we going to tell mom now, or you can get drug around by your nose from fear of what mom thinks for the rest of your days.
Let’s go one by one:
You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Yes, I am.
all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? No, I really appreciate your taking care of the children and I can’t continue to live at work, it’s not fair to the children or you. Renting isn’t the reason, renting is the solution. If we buy, I’ll be working even more and once the kids are in school, you will too.
And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. No, I want to rent just long enough so that we don’t have to live at work to buy and neglect our children and each other. -
December 18, 2007 at 8:56 AM #119689
no_such_reality
ParticipantOuch, well, you can break her of the what are we going to tell mom now, or you can get drug around by your nose from fear of what mom thinks for the rest of your days.
Let’s go one by one:
You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Yes, I am.
all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? No, I really appreciate your taking care of the children and I can’t continue to live at work, it’s not fair to the children or you. Renting isn’t the reason, renting is the solution. If we buy, I’ll be working even more and once the kids are in school, you will too.
And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. No, I want to rent just long enough so that we don’t have to live at work to buy and neglect our children and each other. -
December 18, 2007 at 8:56 AM #119721
no_such_reality
ParticipantOuch, well, you can break her of the what are we going to tell mom now, or you can get drug around by your nose from fear of what mom thinks for the rest of your days.
Let’s go one by one:
You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Yes, I am.
all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? No, I really appreciate your taking care of the children and I can’t continue to live at work, it’s not fair to the children or you. Renting isn’t the reason, renting is the solution. If we buy, I’ll be working even more and once the kids are in school, you will too.
And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. No, I want to rent just long enough so that we don’t have to live at work to buy and neglect our children and each other. -
December 18, 2007 at 8:56 AM #119767
no_such_reality
ParticipantOuch, well, you can break her of the what are we going to tell mom now, or you can get drug around by your nose from fear of what mom thinks for the rest of your days.
Let’s go one by one:
You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Yes, I am.
all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? No, I really appreciate your taking care of the children and I can’t continue to live at work, it’s not fair to the children or you. Renting isn’t the reason, renting is the solution. If we buy, I’ll be working even more and once the kids are in school, you will too.
And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. No, I want to rent just long enough so that we don’t have to live at work to buy and neglect our children and each other. -
December 18, 2007 at 8:56 AM #119786
no_such_reality
ParticipantOuch, well, you can break her of the what are we going to tell mom now, or you can get drug around by your nose from fear of what mom thinks for the rest of your days.
Let’s go one by one:
You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Yes, I am.
all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? No, I really appreciate your taking care of the children and I can’t continue to live at work, it’s not fair to the children or you. Renting isn’t the reason, renting is the solution. If we buy, I’ll be working even more and once the kids are in school, you will too.
And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. No, I want to rent just long enough so that we don’t have to live at work to buy and neglect our children and each other. -
December 18, 2007 at 7:30 AM #119633
raptorduck
Participant“You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Is all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? Is that what you want me to tell my mother? And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. Are you on drugs? That’s it, I am going to my mother’s!”
I swear I thought I asked my wife previously about possibly renting. I did didn’t I? I must have shared that with you guys in the past. Tell me I did. This was essentially the response I got last night when I suggested we consdider renting. It was like I never brought it up before. I know I did. I am sure I did.
It was in the context of selling our current house before we buy a new one. The logic of that did not stand a chance once I used the “R” word.
I am typing with a high pitch key stroke in real time and can hardly walk. I am not sure I physically able to continue to populate the planet after that reaction. I need medical attention.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:30 AM #119666
raptorduck
Participant“You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Is all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? Is that what you want me to tell my mother? And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. Are you on drugs? That’s it, I am going to my mother’s!”
I swear I thought I asked my wife previously about possibly renting. I did didn’t I? I must have shared that with you guys in the past. Tell me I did. This was essentially the response I got last night when I suggested we consdider renting. It was like I never brought it up before. I know I did. I am sure I did.
It was in the context of selling our current house before we buy a new one. The logic of that did not stand a chance once I used the “R” word.
I am typing with a high pitch key stroke in real time and can hardly walk. I am not sure I physically able to continue to populate the planet after that reaction. I need medical attention.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:30 AM #119712
raptorduck
Participant“You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Is all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? Is that what you want me to tell my mother? And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. Are you on drugs? That’s it, I am going to my mother’s!”
I swear I thought I asked my wife previously about possibly renting. I did didn’t I? I must have shared that with you guys in the past. Tell me I did. This was essentially the response I got last night when I suggested we consdider renting. It was like I never brought it up before. I know I did. I am sure I did.
It was in the context of selling our current house before we buy a new one. The logic of that did not stand a chance once I used the “R” word.
I am typing with a high pitch key stroke in real time and can hardly walk. I am not sure I physically able to continue to populate the planet after that reaction. I need medical attention.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:30 AM #119730
raptorduck
Participant“You want to rent!? Are you Serious? Is all my sacrafice raising your kids while you live at work so we can rent? Is that what you want me to tell my mother? And you want to rent for “years” so we can be pushed out by the owner when the market recovers and he wants to sell. Are you on drugs? That’s it, I am going to my mother’s!”
I swear I thought I asked my wife previously about possibly renting. I did didn’t I? I must have shared that with you guys in the past. Tell me I did. This was essentially the response I got last night when I suggested we consdider renting. It was like I never brought it up before. I know I did. I am sure I did.
It was in the context of selling our current house before we buy a new one. The logic of that did not stand a chance once I used the “R” word.
I am typing with a high pitch key stroke in real time and can hardly walk. I am not sure I physically able to continue to populate the planet after that reaction. I need medical attention.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:42 PM #119563
sdrealtor
ParticipantAhem, its 2007 now so it would have to be 7 years. BTW, how much does one get paid for sitting on the couch and drinking beer? Enough to pay that mortgage for 7 years?
BTW, based upon a 30 yr fixed rate around 6%, one would have to come up with payments totaling in excess of 50% of their principal over 7 years.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:42 PM #119596
sdrealtor
ParticipantAhem, its 2007 now so it would have to be 7 years. BTW, how much does one get paid for sitting on the couch and drinking beer? Enough to pay that mortgage for 7 years?
BTW, based upon a 30 yr fixed rate around 6%, one would have to come up with payments totaling in excess of 50% of their principal over 7 years.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:42 PM #119642
sdrealtor
ParticipantAhem, its 2007 now so it would have to be 7 years. BTW, how much does one get paid for sitting on the couch and drinking beer? Enough to pay that mortgage for 7 years?
BTW, based upon a 30 yr fixed rate around 6%, one would have to come up with payments totaling in excess of 50% of their principal over 7 years.
-
December 17, 2007 at 10:42 PM #119661
sdrealtor
ParticipantAhem, its 2007 now so it would have to be 7 years. BTW, how much does one get paid for sitting on the couch and drinking beer? Enough to pay that mortgage for 7 years?
BTW, based upon a 30 yr fixed rate around 6%, one would have to come up with payments totaling in excess of 50% of their principal over 7 years.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:18 PM #119543
Arraya
ParticipantFrom a purely theoretical standpoint, house prices need to fall to match those at the start of the bubble in 2000. Why? Because otherwise we have to believe in The Free Lunch. For The Free Lunch to be true it must be possible for a person to buy a house, do nothing except sit on a couch drinking beer for the next 5 years and get rich in the process. Examining 70 past examples of asset bubbles we find that The Free Lunch has never worked before and it’s very unlikely to work this time either.
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/martenson/2007/1217.html
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:18 PM #119575
Arraya
ParticipantFrom a purely theoretical standpoint, house prices need to fall to match those at the start of the bubble in 2000. Why? Because otherwise we have to believe in The Free Lunch. For The Free Lunch to be true it must be possible for a person to buy a house, do nothing except sit on a couch drinking beer for the next 5 years and get rich in the process. Examining 70 past examples of asset bubbles we find that The Free Lunch has never worked before and it’s very unlikely to work this time either.
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/martenson/2007/1217.html
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:18 PM #119621
Arraya
ParticipantFrom a purely theoretical standpoint, house prices need to fall to match those at the start of the bubble in 2000. Why? Because otherwise we have to believe in The Free Lunch. For The Free Lunch to be true it must be possible for a person to buy a house, do nothing except sit on a couch drinking beer for the next 5 years and get rich in the process. Examining 70 past examples of asset bubbles we find that The Free Lunch has never worked before and it’s very unlikely to work this time either.
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/martenson/2007/1217.html
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:18 PM #119641
Arraya
ParticipantFrom a purely theoretical standpoint, house prices need to fall to match those at the start of the bubble in 2000. Why? Because otherwise we have to believe in The Free Lunch. For The Free Lunch to be true it must be possible for a person to buy a house, do nothing except sit on a couch drinking beer for the next 5 years and get rich in the process. Examining 70 past examples of asset bubbles we find that The Free Lunch has never worked before and it’s very unlikely to work this time either.
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/martenson/2007/1217.html
-
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:13 PM #119539
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantasragov –
Looking at the charts you linked from NationalCity Bancorp it looks like the SD area went to undervalued in about 1992, about 4 years from the price bottom. Although, prices may hit their metric of properly valued, they will likely swing below it for a period of time. I’d guess their metric will at least reach negative 5% to neg. 10% before it will have bottomed.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:13 PM #119571
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantasragov –
Looking at the charts you linked from NationalCity Bancorp it looks like the SD area went to undervalued in about 1992, about 4 years from the price bottom. Although, prices may hit their metric of properly valued, they will likely swing below it for a period of time. I’d guess their metric will at least reach negative 5% to neg. 10% before it will have bottomed.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:13 PM #119615
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantasragov –
Looking at the charts you linked from NationalCity Bancorp it looks like the SD area went to undervalued in about 1992, about 4 years from the price bottom. Although, prices may hit their metric of properly valued, they will likely swing below it for a period of time. I’d guess their metric will at least reach negative 5% to neg. 10% before it will have bottomed.
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:13 PM #119637
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantasragov –
Looking at the charts you linked from NationalCity Bancorp it looks like the SD area went to undervalued in about 1992, about 4 years from the price bottom. Although, prices may hit their metric of properly valued, they will likely swing below it for a period of time. I’d guess their metric will at least reach negative 5% to neg. 10% before it will have bottomed.
-
-
December 17, 2007 at 1:33 PM #119300
asragov
ParticipantWhile I am in no way a bull on home prices, I thought that this latest housing valuation report from National City Bancorp was interesting.
They show San Diego as being overvalued by only about 8% – other areas of California much more so. There are obviously big issues with median price, variation within an area, etc. etc., but it is interesting since it has so much history and so many cities.
Raptorduck, you could probably find data to justify nearly anything. In any case:
http://www.nationalcity.com/corporate/EconomicInsight/HousingValuation/default.asp
-
December 17, 2007 at 1:33 PM #119332
asragov
ParticipantWhile I am in no way a bull on home prices, I thought that this latest housing valuation report from National City Bancorp was interesting.
They show San Diego as being overvalued by only about 8% – other areas of California much more so. There are obviously big issues with median price, variation within an area, etc. etc., but it is interesting since it has so much history and so many cities.
Raptorduck, you could probably find data to justify nearly anything. In any case:
http://www.nationalcity.com/corporate/EconomicInsight/HousingValuation/default.asp
-
December 17, 2007 at 1:33 PM #119374
asragov
ParticipantWhile I am in no way a bull on home prices, I thought that this latest housing valuation report from National City Bancorp was interesting.
They show San Diego as being overvalued by only about 8% – other areas of California much more so. There are obviously big issues with median price, variation within an area, etc. etc., but it is interesting since it has so much history and so many cities.
Raptorduck, you could probably find data to justify nearly anything. In any case:
http://www.nationalcity.com/corporate/EconomicInsight/HousingValuation/default.asp
-
December 17, 2007 at 1:33 PM #119396
asragov
ParticipantWhile I am in no way a bull on home prices, I thought that this latest housing valuation report from National City Bancorp was interesting.
They show San Diego as being overvalued by only about 8% – other areas of California much more so. There are obviously big issues with median price, variation within an area, etc. etc., but it is interesting since it has so much history and so many cities.
Raptorduck, you could probably find data to justify nearly anything. In any case:
http://www.nationalcity.com/corporate/EconomicInsight/HousingValuation/default.asp
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:00 PM #119386
patientrenter
Participantraptorduck, most people here can afford less than 1/10 of what you can afford. At current SD prices, what they can buy isn’t so very nice. And that’s the problem…. prices are lower than last year, but decent places are still unaffordable for all but a very few.
Having said that, obviously some people are mistaking hope for knowledge when they assert that prices will drop by more than 50%, and it’s all in the bag, and God himself came by and told them. It may come to pass, but I haven’t seen anyone lay out the proof yet.
Patient renter in OC
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:00 PM #119519
patientrenter
Participantraptorduck, most people here can afford less than 1/10 of what you can afford. At current SD prices, what they can buy isn’t so very nice. And that’s the problem…. prices are lower than last year, but decent places are still unaffordable for all but a very few.
Having said that, obviously some people are mistaking hope for knowledge when they assert that prices will drop by more than 50%, and it’s all in the bag, and God himself came by and told them. It may come to pass, but I haven’t seen anyone lay out the proof yet.
Patient renter in OC
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:00 PM #119551
patientrenter
Participantraptorduck, most people here can afford less than 1/10 of what you can afford. At current SD prices, what they can buy isn’t so very nice. And that’s the problem…. prices are lower than last year, but decent places are still unaffordable for all but a very few.
Having said that, obviously some people are mistaking hope for knowledge when they assert that prices will drop by more than 50%, and it’s all in the bag, and God himself came by and told them. It may come to pass, but I haven’t seen anyone lay out the proof yet.
Patient renter in OC
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:00 PM #119595
patientrenter
Participantraptorduck, most people here can afford less than 1/10 of what you can afford. At current SD prices, what they can buy isn’t so very nice. And that’s the problem…. prices are lower than last year, but decent places are still unaffordable for all but a very few.
Having said that, obviously some people are mistaking hope for knowledge when they assert that prices will drop by more than 50%, and it’s all in the bag, and God himself came by and told them. It may come to pass, but I haven’t seen anyone lay out the proof yet.
Patient renter in OC
-
December 17, 2007 at 9:00 PM #119616
patientrenter
Participantraptorduck, most people here can afford less than 1/10 of what you can afford. At current SD prices, what they can buy isn’t so very nice. And that’s the problem…. prices are lower than last year, but decent places are still unaffordable for all but a very few.
Having said that, obviously some people are mistaking hope for knowledge when they assert that prices will drop by more than 50%, and it’s all in the bag, and God himself came by and told them. It may come to pass, but I haven’t seen anyone lay out the proof yet.
Patient renter in OC
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.