Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The end of an empire comes when the currency is destroyed..
- This topic has 185 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
bsrsharma.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 11, 2007 at 12:45 PM #114405December 11, 2007 at 7:30 PM #114626
gold_dredger_phd
ParticipantRon Paul is a publicity seeker that wants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
Libertarians are pretty much a mixed bag, as some say good things about the gold standard and the Federal Reserve, but beyond that, they’re more like anarchists.
Ron Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
December 11, 2007 at 7:30 PM #114750ParticipantRon Paul is a publicity seeker that wants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
Libertarians are pretty much a mixed bag, as some say good things about the gold standard and the Federal Reserve, but beyond that, they’re more like anarchists.
Ron Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
December 11, 2007 at 7:30 PM #114787ParticipantRon Paul is a publicity seeker that wants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
Libertarians are pretty much a mixed bag, as some say good things about the gold standard and the Federal Reserve, but beyond that, they’re more like anarchists.
Ron Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
December 11, 2007 at 7:30 PM #114793ParticipantRon Paul is a publicity seeker that wants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
Libertarians are pretty much a mixed bag, as some say good things about the gold standard and the Federal Reserve, but beyond that, they’re more like anarchists.
Ron Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
December 11, 2007 at 7:30 PM #114828ParticipantRon Paul is a publicity seeker that wants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
Libertarians are pretty much a mixed bag, as some say good things about the gold standard and the Federal Reserve, but beyond that, they’re more like anarchists.
Ron Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
December 11, 2007 at 8:41 PM #114646Sandi Egan
Participantwants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
That is not true.
Ron Paul is an OB/GYN doctor that delivered more than 4000 babies. He personally believes, that an abortion is a murder. But he also believes that the federal government has no business dictating individuals what to do. As with many other issues, he thinks that states should deal with abortion. You’d agree, that abortion problem is perceived differently in California and, say, Texas. Same goes for same-sex marriage. Why should there be a federal law forcing its decision one way or another down everybody’s throat?Actually, there is an interview of Ron Paul by a popular womens show ‘View’, where they are discussing abortion issue in detail:
December 11, 2007 at 8:41 PM #114770Participantwants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
That is not true.
Ron Paul is an OB/GYN doctor that delivered more than 4000 babies. He personally believes, that an abortion is a murder. But he also believes that the federal government has no business dictating individuals what to do. As with many other issues, he thinks that states should deal with abortion. You’d agree, that abortion problem is perceived differently in California and, say, Texas. Same goes for same-sex marriage. Why should there be a federal law forcing its decision one way or another down everybody’s throat?Actually, there is an interview of Ron Paul by a popular womens show ‘View’, where they are discussing abortion issue in detail:
December 11, 2007 at 8:41 PM #114807Participantwants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
That is not true.
Ron Paul is an OB/GYN doctor that delivered more than 4000 babies. He personally believes, that an abortion is a murder. But he also believes that the federal government has no business dictating individuals what to do. As with many other issues, he thinks that states should deal with abortion. You’d agree, that abortion problem is perceived differently in California and, say, Texas. Same goes for same-sex marriage. Why should there be a federal law forcing its decision one way or another down everybody’s throat?Actually, there is an interview of Ron Paul by a popular womens show ‘View’, where they are discussing abortion issue in detail:
December 11, 2007 at 8:41 PM #114812Participantwants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
That is not true.
Ron Paul is an OB/GYN doctor that delivered more than 4000 babies. He personally believes, that an abortion is a murder. But he also believes that the federal government has no business dictating individuals what to do. As with many other issues, he thinks that states should deal with abortion. You’d agree, that abortion problem is perceived differently in California and, say, Texas. Same goes for same-sex marriage. Why should there be a federal law forcing its decision one way or another down everybody’s throat?Actually, there is an interview of Ron Paul by a popular womens show ‘View’, where they are discussing abortion issue in detail:
December 11, 2007 at 8:41 PM #114849Participantwants to ban abortion in the first and second trimesters. Look up his position on that.
That is not true.
Ron Paul is an OB/GYN doctor that delivered more than 4000 babies. He personally believes, that an abortion is a murder. But he also believes that the federal government has no business dictating individuals what to do. As with many other issues, he thinks that states should deal with abortion. You’d agree, that abortion problem is perceived differently in California and, say, Texas. Same goes for same-sex marriage. Why should there be a federal law forcing its decision one way or another down everybody’s throat?Actually, there is an interview of Ron Paul by a popular womens show ‘View’, where they are discussing abortion issue in detail:
December 11, 2007 at 9:09 PM #114656ParticipantRon Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
First of all, it’s a point of view question. To me everybody else is trying to spoil Ron Paul’s run.
Secondly, let’s have a look at the rest of the Republican field (let’s leave Dems aside for a moment). We have 5 people whose positions on most issues are so similar it’s difficult to distinguish between them. They all support war and interventionalism. They all are neoconservatives and have neocon advisors. All proclaim their support of conservative values, but most of them have a proven history of being very liberal at times. It’s not bad to be a liberal, but it is bad to be insincere or a flip-flop. How can you trust a guy who makes false promises just to get elected?
They are so similar that even GOP establishment has difficulties distinguishing them. As a result, they take turns as “frontrunners” and “media darlings”. And the rest of the pack uses every opportunity to attack the leader. They all have enough skeletons in the closet to fuel the attacks.
In sharp contrast, Ron Paul verifiably has a very consistent political record that spans 4 decades. He is a man of principle. He has an enormous online following that translates into a very creative real-life grassroots campaign. He raises more money from individual people than any of those, and wins an overwhelming majority of Republican straw polls.
This Sunday, December 16, on the anniversary of Boston Tea Party Ron Paul’s grassroots campaign organizes the greatest online fundraising in history. I encourage everyone to visit the website
pledge and donate.
December 11, 2007 at 9:09 PM #114780ParticipantRon Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
First of all, it’s a point of view question. To me everybody else is trying to spoil Ron Paul’s run.
Secondly, let’s have a look at the rest of the Republican field (let’s leave Dems aside for a moment). We have 5 people whose positions on most issues are so similar it’s difficult to distinguish between them. They all support war and interventionalism. They all are neoconservatives and have neocon advisors. All proclaim their support of conservative values, but most of them have a proven history of being very liberal at times. It’s not bad to be a liberal, but it is bad to be insincere or a flip-flop. How can you trust a guy who makes false promises just to get elected?
They are so similar that even GOP establishment has difficulties distinguishing them. As a result, they take turns as “frontrunners” and “media darlings”. And the rest of the pack uses every opportunity to attack the leader. They all have enough skeletons in the closet to fuel the attacks.
In sharp contrast, Ron Paul verifiably has a very consistent political record that spans 4 decades. He is a man of principle. He has an enormous online following that translates into a very creative real-life grassroots campaign. He raises more money from individual people than any of those, and wins an overwhelming majority of Republican straw polls.
This Sunday, December 16, on the anniversary of Boston Tea Party Ron Paul’s grassroots campaign organizes the greatest online fundraising in history. I encourage everyone to visit the website
pledge and donate.
December 11, 2007 at 9:09 PM #114817ParticipantRon Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
First of all, it’s a point of view question. To me everybody else is trying to spoil Ron Paul’s run.
Secondly, let’s have a look at the rest of the Republican field (let’s leave Dems aside for a moment). We have 5 people whose positions on most issues are so similar it’s difficult to distinguish between them. They all support war and interventionalism. They all are neoconservatives and have neocon advisors. All proclaim their support of conservative values, but most of them have a proven history of being very liberal at times. It’s not bad to be a liberal, but it is bad to be insincere or a flip-flop. How can you trust a guy who makes false promises just to get elected?
They are so similar that even GOP establishment has difficulties distinguishing them. As a result, they take turns as “frontrunners” and “media darlings”. And the rest of the pack uses every opportunity to attack the leader. They all have enough skeletons in the closet to fuel the attacks.
In sharp contrast, Ron Paul verifiably has a very consistent political record that spans 4 decades. He is a man of principle. He has an enormous online following that translates into a very creative real-life grassroots campaign. He raises more money from individual people than any of those, and wins an overwhelming majority of Republican straw polls.
This Sunday, December 16, on the anniversary of Boston Tea Party Ron Paul’s grassroots campaign organizes the greatest online fundraising in history. I encourage everyone to visit the website
pledge and donate.
December 11, 2007 at 9:09 PM #114822ParticipantRon Paul could play the role of spoiler in this election.
First of all, it’s a point of view question. To me everybody else is trying to spoil Ron Paul’s run.
Secondly, let’s have a look at the rest of the Republican field (let’s leave Dems aside for a moment). We have 5 people whose positions on most issues are so similar it’s difficult to distinguish between them. They all support war and interventionalism. They all are neoconservatives and have neocon advisors. All proclaim their support of conservative values, but most of them have a proven history of being very liberal at times. It’s not bad to be a liberal, but it is bad to be insincere or a flip-flop. How can you trust a guy who makes false promises just to get elected?
They are so similar that even GOP establishment has difficulties distinguishing them. As a result, they take turns as “frontrunners” and “media darlings”. And the rest of the pack uses every opportunity to attack the leader. They all have enough skeletons in the closet to fuel the attacks.
In sharp contrast, Ron Paul verifiably has a very consistent political record that spans 4 decades. He is a man of principle. He has an enormous online following that translates into a very creative real-life grassroots campaign. He raises more money from individual people than any of those, and wins an overwhelming majority of Republican straw polls.
This Sunday, December 16, on the anniversary of Boston Tea Party Ron Paul’s grassroots campaign organizes the greatest online fundraising in history. I encourage everyone to visit the website
pledge and donate.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.