- This topic has 55 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 15, 2007 at 1:35 PM #118115December 15, 2007 at 1:59 PM #117904(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
it’s complety random
I agree it’s a small sample and already too much time has been spent on the subject.
But, if it were completely random wouldn’t that make it more valid. Probability & Statistics 101, anyone ?
P.S. – The poll was done by the same folks who perform the Consumer Sentiment Survey. I’m sure after 60 years they understand something about sampling, survey bias and estimation.
December 15, 2007 at 1:59 PM #118035(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantit’s complety random
I agree it’s a small sample and already too much time has been spent on the subject.
But, if it were completely random wouldn’t that make it more valid. Probability & Statistics 101, anyone ?
P.S. – The poll was done by the same folks who perform the Consumer Sentiment Survey. I’m sure after 60 years they understand something about sampling, survey bias and estimation.
December 15, 2007 at 1:59 PM #118067(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantit’s complety random
I agree it’s a small sample and already too much time has been spent on the subject.
But, if it were completely random wouldn’t that make it more valid. Probability & Statistics 101, anyone ?
P.S. – The poll was done by the same folks who perform the Consumer Sentiment Survey. I’m sure after 60 years they understand something about sampling, survey bias and estimation.
December 15, 2007 at 1:59 PM #118107(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantit’s complety random
I agree it’s a small sample and already too much time has been spent on the subject.
But, if it were completely random wouldn’t that make it more valid. Probability & Statistics 101, anyone ?
P.S. – The poll was done by the same folks who perform the Consumer Sentiment Survey. I’m sure after 60 years they understand something about sampling, survey bias and estimation.
December 15, 2007 at 1:59 PM #118130(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantit’s complety random
I agree it’s a small sample and already too much time has been spent on the subject.
But, if it were completely random wouldn’t that make it more valid. Probability & Statistics 101, anyone ?
P.S. – The poll was done by the same folks who perform the Consumer Sentiment Survey. I’m sure after 60 years they understand something about sampling, survey bias and estimation.
December 15, 2007 at 2:02 PM #117909(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOther random polls :
Some people expect a recession …
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2060490120071121Many don’t like George Bush …
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1624620720071017And these results were based on fewer samples than the expected housing price poll.
December 15, 2007 at 2:02 PM #118040(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOther random polls :
Some people expect a recession …
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2060490120071121Many don’t like George Bush …
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1624620720071017And these results were based on fewer samples than the expected housing price poll.
December 15, 2007 at 2:02 PM #118072(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOther random polls :
Some people expect a recession …
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2060490120071121Many don’t like George Bush …
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1624620720071017And these results were based on fewer samples than the expected housing price poll.
December 15, 2007 at 2:02 PM #118113(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOther random polls :
Some people expect a recession …
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2060490120071121Many don’t like George Bush …
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1624620720071017And these results were based on fewer samples than the expected housing price poll.
December 15, 2007 at 2:02 PM #118135(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOther random polls :
Some people expect a recession …
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2060490120071121Many don’t like George Bush …
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1624620720071017And these results were based on fewer samples than the expected housing price poll.
December 15, 2007 at 5:02 PM #118007RatherOpinionatedParticipant[img_assist|nid=5698|title=Sentiment Cycles|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=320]
December 15, 2007 at 5:02 PM #118139RatherOpinionatedParticipant[img_assist|nid=5698|title=Sentiment Cycles|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=320]
December 15, 2007 at 5:02 PM #118173RatherOpinionatedParticipant[img_assist|nid=5698|title=Sentiment Cycles|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=320]
December 15, 2007 at 5:02 PM #118213RatherOpinionatedParticipant[img_assist|nid=5698|title=Sentiment Cycles|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=320]
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.