Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US

[stockstradr]

I predict a few years from now, she’ll be regarded as a POOR choice for VP. He’s going to lose, and she’ll be seen as another weak link in the chain that broke.

I believe that behind the scenes, McCain chose her as a last choice after he asked several heavy-hitters to joing his ticket. Those real contenders had the political savvy to know this particular Republican ticket is a losing ticket.

Did you see the cover of USA Today on Sat? They put Obama on the front page, and that story was so incredibly biased positive; they made him look unstoppable, made him look like the savior of America. The liberal press loves this guy. And they do NOT like McCain and for certain do not like this VP pick. Even though I support Obama for Presidency, I can admit the liberal press is biased towards Obama.

Oh, and you gotta love how Palin, who proudly carries the conservative family VALUES banner, is revealed to have a unmarried but very pregnant teenage daughter.

[sdnativeson]

Allan, unless you know the ancestry of those that “run universities like Georgetown and Loyola” and that ancestry is primarily that of Spanish nobility, your comment is inaccurate.

[sdnativeson]

Allan, unless you know the ancestry of those that “run universities like Georgetown and Loyola” and that ancestry is primarily that of Spanish nobility, your comment is inaccurate.

[sdnativeson]

Allan, unless you know the ancestry of those that “run universities like Georgetown and Loyola” and that ancestry is primarily that of Spanish nobility, your comment is inaccurate.

[sdnativeson]

Allan, unless you know the ancestry of those that “run universities like Georgetown and Loyola” and that ancestry is primarily that of Spanish nobility, your comment is inaccurate.

[sdnativeson]

Allan, unless you know the ancestry of those that “run universities like Georgetown and Loyola” and that ancestry is primarily that of Spanish nobility, your comment is inaccurate.

[gandalf]

I agree, Palin is a concensus poor choice after the dust settles.

BTW, with press, I don’t think it’s liberal bias. Or conservative bias. I just think they’re biased.

Me? I see ‘generational’ bias. It sounds “made-for-boomers”, left or right, all the way down to the Viagra commercials in between segments. Bunch of pompous ‘opinion makers’, manufacturing ‘stories’ and marketing their programs.

Next time you watch TV, if you still do, compare an average PBS NewsHour broadcast to the garbage on network and cable channels. They do a good job of getting at the facts and substance of an issue without commentary or opinion.

Also, with respect to Obama coverage, I’d suggest that the entire nation is biased, 80% disapproving of Bush/Republican years, towards new options. Obama just happens to be the guy in a “throw the bums out” season.

[gandalf]

I agree, Palin is a concensus poor choice after the dust settles.

BTW, with press, I don’t think it’s liberal bias. Or conservative bias. I just think they’re biased.

Me? I see ‘generational’ bias. It sounds “made-for-boomers”, left or right, all the way down to the Viagra commercials in between segments. Bunch of pompous ‘opinion makers’, manufacturing ‘stories’ and marketing their programs.

Next time you watch TV, if you still do, compare an average PBS NewsHour broadcast to the garbage on network and cable channels. They do a good job of getting at the facts and substance of an issue without commentary or opinion.

Also, with respect to Obama coverage, I’d suggest that the entire nation is biased, 80% disapproving of Bush/Republican years, towards new options. Obama just happens to be the guy in a “throw the bums out” season.

[gandalf]

I agree, Palin is a concensus poor choice after the dust settles.

BTW, with press, I don’t think it’s liberal bias. Or conservative bias. I just think they’re biased.

Me? I see ‘generational’ bias. It sounds “made-for-boomers”, left or right, all the way down to the Viagra commercials in between segments. Bunch of pompous ‘opinion makers’, manufacturing ‘stories’ and marketing their programs.

Next time you watch TV, if you still do, compare an average PBS NewsHour broadcast to the garbage on network and cable channels. They do a good job of getting at the facts and substance of an issue without commentary or opinion.

Also, with respect to Obama coverage, I’d suggest that the entire nation is biased, 80% disapproving of Bush/Republican years, towards new options. Obama just happens to be the guy in a “throw the bums out” season.

[gandalf]

I agree, Palin is a concensus poor choice after the dust settles.

BTW, with press, I don’t think it’s liberal bias. Or conservative bias. I just think they’re biased.

Me? I see ‘generational’ bias. It sounds “made-for-boomers”, left or right, all the way down to the Viagra commercials in between segments. Bunch of pompous ‘opinion makers’, manufacturing ‘stories’ and marketing their programs.

Next time you watch TV, if you still do, compare an average PBS NewsHour broadcast to the garbage on network and cable channels. They do a good job of getting at the facts and substance of an issue without commentary or opinion.

Also, with respect to Obama coverage, I’d suggest that the entire nation is biased, 80% disapproving of Bush/Republican years, towards new options. Obama just happens to be the guy in a “throw the bums out” season.

[gandalf]

I agree, Palin is a concensus poor choice after the dust settles.

BTW, with press, I don’t think it’s liberal bias. Or conservative bias. I just think they’re biased.

Me? I see ‘generational’ bias. It sounds “made-for-boomers”, left or right, all the way down to the Viagra commercials in between segments. Bunch of pompous ‘opinion makers’, manufacturing ‘stories’ and marketing their programs.

Next time you watch TV, if you still do, compare an average PBS NewsHour broadcast to the garbage on network and cable channels. They do a good job of getting at the facts and substance of an issue without commentary or opinion.

Also, with respect to Obama coverage, I’d suggest that the entire nation is biased, 80% disapproving of Bush/Republican years, towards new options. Obama just happens to be the guy in a “throw the bums out” season.

[afx114]

Obviously the media is liberally biased, because as the prophet Stephen T. Colbert states, “Facts have a well known liberal bias.”

[afx114]

Obviously the media is liberally biased, because as the prophet Stephen T. Colbert states, “Facts have a well known liberal bias.”

[afx114]

Obviously the media is liberally biased, because as the prophet Stephen T. Colbert states, “Facts have a well known liberal bias.”

[afx114]

Obviously the media is liberally biased, because as the prophet Stephen T. Colbert states, “Facts have a well known liberal bias.”

[Author]

Posts