Home › Forums › Housing › San Diego Home Sales about to be revised downward BIGTIME (89% to 6.5% increase in May)
- This topic has 335 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by capeman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM #423382June 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM #422652sdrealtorParticipant
I dont know anything about those reports nor do I care. I dont know any other Realtors that pay attention to them either. Here is what we know. There is very little sellable property on the market. There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.
June 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM #422883sdrealtorParticipantI dont know anything about those reports nor do I care. I dont know any other Realtors that pay attention to them either. Here is what we know. There is very little sellable property on the market. There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.
June 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM #423158sdrealtorParticipantI dont know anything about those reports nor do I care. I dont know any other Realtors that pay attention to them either. Here is what we know. There is very little sellable property on the market. There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.
June 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM #423226sdrealtorParticipantI dont know anything about those reports nor do I care. I dont know any other Realtors that pay attention to them either. Here is what we know. There is very little sellable property on the market. There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.
June 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM #423387sdrealtorParticipantI dont know anything about those reports nor do I care. I dont know any other Realtors that pay attention to them either. Here is what we know. There is very little sellable property on the market. There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.
June 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM #422657HatfieldParticipantKinda like this SD-UT article:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/30/bn30housing115437/?business&zIndex=124782
That the rate at which home prices are falling slowed last month is interesting, but it would have been useful to see what the sales volume was.
June 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM #422888HatfieldParticipantKinda like this SD-UT article:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/30/bn30housing115437/?business&zIndex=124782
That the rate at which home prices are falling slowed last month is interesting, but it would have been useful to see what the sales volume was.
June 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM #423163HatfieldParticipantKinda like this SD-UT article:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/30/bn30housing115437/?business&zIndex=124782
That the rate at which home prices are falling slowed last month is interesting, but it would have been useful to see what the sales volume was.
June 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM #423231HatfieldParticipantKinda like this SD-UT article:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/30/bn30housing115437/?business&zIndex=124782
That the rate at which home prices are falling slowed last month is interesting, but it would have been useful to see what the sales volume was.
June 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM #423392HatfieldParticipantKinda like this SD-UT article:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/30/bn30housing115437/?business&zIndex=124782
That the rate at which home prices are falling slowed last month is interesting, but it would have been useful to see what the sales volume was.
June 30, 2009 at 5:38 PM #422662capemanParticipant[quote]There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.[/quote]
That would require overall price increases and we’re not seeing that. I believe you on what you’re seeing but you can’t say real demand outstrips supply without prices going up instead of continuing down.
Jmail- Case/Shiller is based on pricing over time and not on sales volume so it shouldn’t affect the numbers. The supply/demand metric that SD is talking about if it is real will hit pricing and will be reflected Case/Shiller numbers in the next two months.
June 30, 2009 at 5:38 PM #422893capemanParticipant[quote]There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.[/quote]
That would require overall price increases and we’re not seeing that. I believe you on what you’re seeing but you can’t say real demand outstrips supply without prices going up instead of continuing down.
Jmail- Case/Shiller is based on pricing over time and not on sales volume so it shouldn’t affect the numbers. The supply/demand metric that SD is talking about if it is real will hit pricing and will be reflected Case/Shiller numbers in the next two months.
June 30, 2009 at 5:38 PM #423168capemanParticipant[quote]There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.[/quote]
That would require overall price increases and we’re not seeing that. I believe you on what you’re seeing but you can’t say real demand outstrips supply without prices going up instead of continuing down.
Jmail- Case/Shiller is based on pricing over time and not on sales volume so it shouldn’t affect the numbers. The supply/demand metric that SD is talking about if it is real will hit pricing and will be reflected Case/Shiller numbers in the next two months.
June 30, 2009 at 5:38 PM #423236capemanParticipant[quote]There is alot more demand than supply right now. If there was adequate supply the sales numbers would be even higher than the mistaken figures they published.[/quote]
That would require overall price increases and we’re not seeing that. I believe you on what you’re seeing but you can’t say real demand outstrips supply without prices going up instead of continuing down.
Jmail- Case/Shiller is based on pricing over time and not on sales volume so it shouldn’t affect the numbers. The supply/demand metric that SD is talking about if it is real will hit pricing and will be reflected Case/Shiller numbers in the next two months.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.