Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Pivotal Day in US History Supreme Court says FU to Contract Law
- This topic has 135 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by PCinSD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM #414100June 10, 2009 at 6:27 PM #413404BuyerWillEPBParticipant
The courts can legislate from the bench. We can legislate with our dollars. Boycott Chrysler (Fiat)and GM.
June 10, 2009 at 6:27 PM #413640BuyerWillEPBParticipantThe courts can legislate from the bench. We can legislate with our dollars. Boycott Chrysler (Fiat)and GM.
June 10, 2009 at 6:27 PM #413889BuyerWillEPBParticipantThe courts can legislate from the bench. We can legislate with our dollars. Boycott Chrysler (Fiat)and GM.
June 10, 2009 at 6:27 PM #413958BuyerWillEPBParticipantThe courts can legislate from the bench. We can legislate with our dollars. Boycott Chrysler (Fiat)and GM.
June 10, 2009 at 6:27 PM #414110BuyerWillEPBParticipantThe courts can legislate from the bench. We can legislate with our dollars. Boycott Chrysler (Fiat)and GM.
June 10, 2009 at 6:58 PM #413423partypupParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote] our Supreme Court decided that it would no longer adhere to Bankruptcy Law nor Contract Law. Our Government, headed by Barrack Obama[/quote]
So was it Supreme Court or Barack Obama that decided … whatever it is you say it decided? Last I checked, the Supreme Court was very conservative. Out of nine judges, two were appointed by Reagan, two by Bush Senior, and two by Bush Junior. They are no friends of Barack Obama.
[/quote]
Both parties and their Court appointees now play for the same team. This is old news.
June 10, 2009 at 6:58 PM #413659partypupParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote] our Supreme Court decided that it would no longer adhere to Bankruptcy Law nor Contract Law. Our Government, headed by Barrack Obama[/quote]
So was it Supreme Court or Barack Obama that decided … whatever it is you say it decided? Last I checked, the Supreme Court was very conservative. Out of nine judges, two were appointed by Reagan, two by Bush Senior, and two by Bush Junior. They are no friends of Barack Obama.
[/quote]
Both parties and their Court appointees now play for the same team. This is old news.
June 10, 2009 at 6:58 PM #413909partypupParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote] our Supreme Court decided that it would no longer adhere to Bankruptcy Law nor Contract Law. Our Government, headed by Barrack Obama[/quote]
So was it Supreme Court or Barack Obama that decided … whatever it is you say it decided? Last I checked, the Supreme Court was very conservative. Out of nine judges, two were appointed by Reagan, two by Bush Senior, and two by Bush Junior. They are no friends of Barack Obama.
[/quote]
Both parties and their Court appointees now play for the same team. This is old news.
June 10, 2009 at 6:58 PM #413978partypupParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote] our Supreme Court decided that it would no longer adhere to Bankruptcy Law nor Contract Law. Our Government, headed by Barrack Obama[/quote]
So was it Supreme Court or Barack Obama that decided … whatever it is you say it decided? Last I checked, the Supreme Court was very conservative. Out of nine judges, two were appointed by Reagan, two by Bush Senior, and two by Bush Junior. They are no friends of Barack Obama.
[/quote]
Both parties and their Court appointees now play for the same team. This is old news.
June 10, 2009 at 6:58 PM #414130partypupParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote] our Supreme Court decided that it would no longer adhere to Bankruptcy Law nor Contract Law. Our Government, headed by Barrack Obama[/quote]
So was it Supreme Court or Barack Obama that decided … whatever it is you say it decided? Last I checked, the Supreme Court was very conservative. Out of nine judges, two were appointed by Reagan, two by Bush Senior, and two by Bush Junior. They are no friends of Barack Obama.
[/quote]
Both parties and their Court appointees now play for the same team. This is old news.
June 10, 2009 at 7:32 PM #413457BuyerWillEPBParticipantJune 10, 2009 at 7:32 PM #413694BuyerWillEPBParticipantJune 10, 2009 at 7:32 PM #413943BuyerWillEPBParticipantJune 10, 2009 at 7:32 PM #414013BuyerWillEPBParticipant -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.