- This topic has 522 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 2 months ago by
CAwireman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 19, 2008 at 7:37 AM #258939August 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM #258707
5yearwaiter
ParticipantIs any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level
August 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM #2588965yearwaiter
ParticipantIs any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level
August 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM #2589095yearwaiter
ParticipantIs any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level
August 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM #2589575yearwaiter
ParticipantIs any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level
August 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM #2589995yearwaiter
ParticipantIs any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level
August 19, 2008 at 3:31 PM #258805cr
Participant[quote=5yearwaiter]Is any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level[/quote]
The housing bill is a joke. It’s only a bail out for Fannie and Freddie, and it will do very little in CA. To be able to refinance at a lower rate the banks have to agree to take an additional 10% loss in a market like CA where prices have already dropped 30% or more. Even if the banks will do that the homeowner still has to qualify under 30 year fixed, while actually proving their income. Then when they go to sell up to 50% of their equity goes back to the government.
What do you think people are going to do? They’ll just stop paying and wait for the Sherriff to come knocking.
August 19, 2008 at 3:31 PM #258996cr
Participant[quote=5yearwaiter]Is any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level[/quote]
The housing bill is a joke. It’s only a bail out for Fannie and Freddie, and it will do very little in CA. To be able to refinance at a lower rate the banks have to agree to take an additional 10% loss in a market like CA where prices have already dropped 30% or more. Even if the banks will do that the homeowner still has to qualify under 30 year fixed, while actually proving their income. Then when they go to sell up to 50% of their equity goes back to the government.
What do you think people are going to do? They’ll just stop paying and wait for the Sherriff to come knocking.
August 19, 2008 at 3:31 PM #259008cr
Participant[quote=5yearwaiter]Is any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level[/quote]
The housing bill is a joke. It’s only a bail out for Fannie and Freddie, and it will do very little in CA. To be able to refinance at a lower rate the banks have to agree to take an additional 10% loss in a market like CA where prices have already dropped 30% or more. Even if the banks will do that the homeowner still has to qualify under 30 year fixed, while actually proving their income. Then when they go to sell up to 50% of their equity goes back to the government.
What do you think people are going to do? They’ll just stop paying and wait for the Sherriff to come knocking.
August 19, 2008 at 3:31 PM #259057cr
Participant[quote=5yearwaiter]Is any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level[/quote]
The housing bill is a joke. It’s only a bail out for Fannie and Freddie, and it will do very little in CA. To be able to refinance at a lower rate the banks have to agree to take an additional 10% loss in a market like CA where prices have already dropped 30% or more. Even if the banks will do that the homeowner still has to qualify under 30 year fixed, while actually proving their income. Then when they go to sell up to 50% of their equity goes back to the government.
What do you think people are going to do? They’ll just stop paying and wait for the Sherriff to come knocking.
August 19, 2008 at 3:31 PM #259098cr
Participant[quote=5yearwaiter]Is any one else thinking about the new housing bill that gave flex to “whoever in the ARM need to refinance now may get blessed with 87 % of new apprisal value”?. As per this, do you still think the home prices may go down to 2000 level[/quote]
The housing bill is a joke. It’s only a bail out for Fannie and Freddie, and it will do very little in CA. To be able to refinance at a lower rate the banks have to agree to take an additional 10% loss in a market like CA where prices have already dropped 30% or more. Even if the banks will do that the homeowner still has to qualify under 30 year fixed, while actually proving their income. Then when they go to sell up to 50% of their equity goes back to the government.
What do you think people are going to do? They’ll just stop paying and wait for the Sherriff to come knocking.
August 20, 2008 at 8:10 AM #258970Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantLike most brokers who try to get you to buy into the hype, then sell into the panic.
Maybe fun to watch, but not a good way to make money, and even harder to go against.
good luck.
August 20, 2008 at 8:10 AM #259161Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantLike most brokers who try to get you to buy into the hype, then sell into the panic.
Maybe fun to watch, but not a good way to make money, and even harder to go against.
good luck.
August 20, 2008 at 8:10 AM #259174Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantLike most brokers who try to get you to buy into the hype, then sell into the panic.
Maybe fun to watch, but not a good way to make money, and even harder to go against.
good luck.
August 20, 2008 at 8:10 AM #259222Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantLike most brokers who try to get you to buy into the hype, then sell into the panic.
Maybe fun to watch, but not a good way to make money, and even harder to go against.
good luck.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.