- This topic has 522 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 1 month ago by
CAwireman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 11, 2008 at 1:31 PM #13573August 12, 2008 at 6:29 AM #255981
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantHate to be a party pooper here but ,
The one thing this peter guy leaves out of his theory’s is that the vast majority of home owners are just fine and are not going anywhere during this downturn (execpt maybe to pick up a few more investment properties when things get really cheap).
While I do expect home prices could well go below 2000 prices in less desirable area’s and in some really overbuilt area’s, most of SD does not fit that description.
Stockton or say Sacramento Yes — that would fit into the above description.
For those who can wait this out, or for those who find some bargins in this downturn, they will be winners in the long run (esp in the SD area).
Just my two cents,
Good luck
August 12, 2008 at 6:29 AM #256159Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantHate to be a party pooper here but ,
The one thing this peter guy leaves out of his theory’s is that the vast majority of home owners are just fine and are not going anywhere during this downturn (execpt maybe to pick up a few more investment properties when things get really cheap).
While I do expect home prices could well go below 2000 prices in less desirable area’s and in some really overbuilt area’s, most of SD does not fit that description.
Stockton or say Sacramento Yes — that would fit into the above description.
For those who can wait this out, or for those who find some bargins in this downturn, they will be winners in the long run (esp in the SD area).
Just my two cents,
Good luck
August 12, 2008 at 6:29 AM #256163Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantHate to be a party pooper here but ,
The one thing this peter guy leaves out of his theory’s is that the vast majority of home owners are just fine and are not going anywhere during this downturn (execpt maybe to pick up a few more investment properties when things get really cheap).
While I do expect home prices could well go below 2000 prices in less desirable area’s and in some really overbuilt area’s, most of SD does not fit that description.
Stockton or say Sacramento Yes — that would fit into the above description.
For those who can wait this out, or for those who find some bargins in this downturn, they will be winners in the long run (esp in the SD area).
Just my two cents,
Good luck
August 12, 2008 at 6:29 AM #256222Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantHate to be a party pooper here but ,
The one thing this peter guy leaves out of his theory’s is that the vast majority of home owners are just fine and are not going anywhere during this downturn (execpt maybe to pick up a few more investment properties when things get really cheap).
While I do expect home prices could well go below 2000 prices in less desirable area’s and in some really overbuilt area’s, most of SD does not fit that description.
Stockton or say Sacramento Yes — that would fit into the above description.
For those who can wait this out, or for those who find some bargins in this downturn, they will be winners in the long run (esp in the SD area).
Just my two cents,
Good luck
August 12, 2008 at 6:29 AM #256271Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantHate to be a party pooper here but ,
The one thing this peter guy leaves out of his theory’s is that the vast majority of home owners are just fine and are not going anywhere during this downturn (execpt maybe to pick up a few more investment properties when things get really cheap).
While I do expect home prices could well go below 2000 prices in less desirable area’s and in some really overbuilt area’s, most of SD does not fit that description.
Stockton or say Sacramento Yes — that would fit into the above description.
For those who can wait this out, or for those who find some bargins in this downturn, they will be winners in the long run (esp in the SD area).
Just my two cents,
Good luck
August 12, 2008 at 8:53 AM #256020(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThis article cites all the obvious things, but does not identify the precise factor that leads him to the conclusion of 2000 prices.
The closest thing I can find is that he says lending standards have tightened to something close to 2000 standards … “These dynamics are actually much worse than what were in place in the summer of 2000”
What happens if lending standards tighten to 1985 standards (which I could see happening)? Does this mean we are headed to 1985 prices.
Give me something solid to hang your hat on regarding 2000 prices, not all the hype and emotion-laden prose …
my favorites …
“interrupted consumption binge”
“It’s a pleasant dream, but the wakeup call can’t be too far off.”
“every step down the housing abyss”
“horrific fundamentals”
“sentimental hope”
“sooner or later reality must intrude.”
“Once the wake up call sounds …”and of course the last sentence …
“read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.””
August 12, 2008 at 8:53 AM #256199(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThis article cites all the obvious things, but does not identify the precise factor that leads him to the conclusion of 2000 prices.
The closest thing I can find is that he says lending standards have tightened to something close to 2000 standards … “These dynamics are actually much worse than what were in place in the summer of 2000”
What happens if lending standards tighten to 1985 standards (which I could see happening)? Does this mean we are headed to 1985 prices.
Give me something solid to hang your hat on regarding 2000 prices, not all the hype and emotion-laden prose …
my favorites …
“interrupted consumption binge”
“It’s a pleasant dream, but the wakeup call can’t be too far off.”
“every step down the housing abyss”
“horrific fundamentals”
“sentimental hope”
“sooner or later reality must intrude.”
“Once the wake up call sounds …”and of course the last sentence …
“read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.””
August 12, 2008 at 8:53 AM #256203(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThis article cites all the obvious things, but does not identify the precise factor that leads him to the conclusion of 2000 prices.
The closest thing I can find is that he says lending standards have tightened to something close to 2000 standards … “These dynamics are actually much worse than what were in place in the summer of 2000”
What happens if lending standards tighten to 1985 standards (which I could see happening)? Does this mean we are headed to 1985 prices.
Give me something solid to hang your hat on regarding 2000 prices, not all the hype and emotion-laden prose …
my favorites …
“interrupted consumption binge”
“It’s a pleasant dream, but the wakeup call can’t be too far off.”
“every step down the housing abyss”
“horrific fundamentals”
“sentimental hope”
“sooner or later reality must intrude.”
“Once the wake up call sounds …”and of course the last sentence …
“read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.””
August 12, 2008 at 8:53 AM #256262(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThis article cites all the obvious things, but does not identify the precise factor that leads him to the conclusion of 2000 prices.
The closest thing I can find is that he says lending standards have tightened to something close to 2000 standards … “These dynamics are actually much worse than what were in place in the summer of 2000”
What happens if lending standards tighten to 1985 standards (which I could see happening)? Does this mean we are headed to 1985 prices.
Give me something solid to hang your hat on regarding 2000 prices, not all the hype and emotion-laden prose …
my favorites …
“interrupted consumption binge”
“It’s a pleasant dream, but the wakeup call can’t be too far off.”
“every step down the housing abyss”
“horrific fundamentals”
“sentimental hope”
“sooner or later reality must intrude.”
“Once the wake up call sounds …”and of course the last sentence …
“read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.””
August 12, 2008 at 8:53 AM #256311(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThis article cites all the obvious things, but does not identify the precise factor that leads him to the conclusion of 2000 prices.
The closest thing I can find is that he says lending standards have tightened to something close to 2000 standards … “These dynamics are actually much worse than what were in place in the summer of 2000”
What happens if lending standards tighten to 1985 standards (which I could see happening)? Does this mean we are headed to 1985 prices.
Give me something solid to hang your hat on regarding 2000 prices, not all the hype and emotion-laden prose …
my favorites …
“interrupted consumption binge”
“It’s a pleasant dream, but the wakeup call can’t be too far off.”
“every step down the housing abyss”
“horrific fundamentals”
“sentimental hope”
“sooner or later reality must intrude.”
“Once the wake up call sounds …”and of course the last sentence …
“read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.””
August 12, 2008 at 9:52 AM #256070Mark Holmes
ParticipantMock him all you want, but it doesn’t change reality. Having read his nearly two-year-old book, I can tell you that everything he’s predicted so far has come true. And I would be willing to bet that both of you are homeowners…
A very old man, a native San Diegan, told me a few years ago, that we would be able to tell the bottom of the market when “everyone knows that real estate is the worst investment you can make.”
As long as there are people arguing that now is the time to buy, before “it’s too late” I’ll wait to buy. At least until 2011 or 2012.
I don’t have to buy. But it seems there are increasingly plenty of people (and plenty of banks) who have to sell.
August 12, 2008 at 9:52 AM #256250Mark Holmes
ParticipantMock him all you want, but it doesn’t change reality. Having read his nearly two-year-old book, I can tell you that everything he’s predicted so far has come true. And I would be willing to bet that both of you are homeowners…
A very old man, a native San Diegan, told me a few years ago, that we would be able to tell the bottom of the market when “everyone knows that real estate is the worst investment you can make.”
As long as there are people arguing that now is the time to buy, before “it’s too late” I’ll wait to buy. At least until 2011 or 2012.
I don’t have to buy. But it seems there are increasingly plenty of people (and plenty of banks) who have to sell.
August 12, 2008 at 9:52 AM #256253Mark Holmes
ParticipantMock him all you want, but it doesn’t change reality. Having read his nearly two-year-old book, I can tell you that everything he’s predicted so far has come true. And I would be willing to bet that both of you are homeowners…
A very old man, a native San Diegan, told me a few years ago, that we would be able to tell the bottom of the market when “everyone knows that real estate is the worst investment you can make.”
As long as there are people arguing that now is the time to buy, before “it’s too late” I’ll wait to buy. At least until 2011 or 2012.
I don’t have to buy. But it seems there are increasingly plenty of people (and plenty of banks) who have to sell.
August 12, 2008 at 9:52 AM #256313Mark Holmes
ParticipantMock him all you want, but it doesn’t change reality. Having read his nearly two-year-old book, I can tell you that everything he’s predicted so far has come true. And I would be willing to bet that both of you are homeowners…
A very old man, a native San Diegan, told me a few years ago, that we would be able to tell the bottom of the market when “everyone knows that real estate is the worst investment you can make.”
As long as there are people arguing that now is the time to buy, before “it’s too late” I’ll wait to buy. At least until 2011 or 2012.
I don’t have to buy. But it seems there are increasingly plenty of people (and plenty of banks) who have to sell.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.