- This topic has 70 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 10 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 17, 2010 at 10:42 PM #18199November 18, 2010 at 11:40 AM #631840
briansd1
GuestYeah, I read the article.
Without Uncle Sam, we’d be in deep trouble right now.
November 18, 2010 at 11:40 AM #631917briansd1
GuestYeah, I read the article.
Without Uncle Sam, we’d be in deep trouble right now.
November 18, 2010 at 11:40 AM #632491briansd1
GuestYeah, I read the article.
Without Uncle Sam, we’d be in deep trouble right now.
November 18, 2010 at 11:40 AM #632618briansd1
GuestYeah, I read the article.
Without Uncle Sam, we’d be in deep trouble right now.
November 18, 2010 at 11:40 AM #632936briansd1
GuestYeah, I read the article.
Without Uncle Sam, we’d be in deep trouble right now.
November 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM #631870Rich Toscano
KeymasterWow, the guy who has a $10 billion investment in Wells Fargo thinks the bank bailout was a good thing. Shocker.
Bias notwithstanding, here are my two problems with this article:
1. It gives a free pass for the government failing to prevent — if not outright aiding and abetting, in many cases — the years of bubbles and capital misallocation that brought the crisis on to begin with.
2. He acts as if it’s all over. Yes, they mitigated one problem, but in so doing they have created another potentially even bigger problem. It’s not yet clear what will be the consequences of all the borrowing and printing that financed the bailout, and it’s thus way, way too early for the pro-bailout folks to declare victory.
November 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM #631947Rich Toscano
KeymasterWow, the guy who has a $10 billion investment in Wells Fargo thinks the bank bailout was a good thing. Shocker.
Bias notwithstanding, here are my two problems with this article:
1. It gives a free pass for the government failing to prevent — if not outright aiding and abetting, in many cases — the years of bubbles and capital misallocation that brought the crisis on to begin with.
2. He acts as if it’s all over. Yes, they mitigated one problem, but in so doing they have created another potentially even bigger problem. It’s not yet clear what will be the consequences of all the borrowing and printing that financed the bailout, and it’s thus way, way too early for the pro-bailout folks to declare victory.
November 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM #632521Rich Toscano
KeymasterWow, the guy who has a $10 billion investment in Wells Fargo thinks the bank bailout was a good thing. Shocker.
Bias notwithstanding, here are my two problems with this article:
1. It gives a free pass for the government failing to prevent — if not outright aiding and abetting, in many cases — the years of bubbles and capital misallocation that brought the crisis on to begin with.
2. He acts as if it’s all over. Yes, they mitigated one problem, but in so doing they have created another potentially even bigger problem. It’s not yet clear what will be the consequences of all the borrowing and printing that financed the bailout, and it’s thus way, way too early for the pro-bailout folks to declare victory.
November 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM #632648Rich Toscano
KeymasterWow, the guy who has a $10 billion investment in Wells Fargo thinks the bank bailout was a good thing. Shocker.
Bias notwithstanding, here are my two problems with this article:
1. It gives a free pass for the government failing to prevent — if not outright aiding and abetting, in many cases — the years of bubbles and capital misallocation that brought the crisis on to begin with.
2. He acts as if it’s all over. Yes, they mitigated one problem, but in so doing they have created another potentially even bigger problem. It’s not yet clear what will be the consequences of all the borrowing and printing that financed the bailout, and it’s thus way, way too early for the pro-bailout folks to declare victory.
November 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM #632966Rich Toscano
KeymasterWow, the guy who has a $10 billion investment in Wells Fargo thinks the bank bailout was a good thing. Shocker.
Bias notwithstanding, here are my two problems with this article:
1. It gives a free pass for the government failing to prevent — if not outright aiding and abetting, in many cases — the years of bubbles and capital misallocation that brought the crisis on to begin with.
2. He acts as if it’s all over. Yes, they mitigated one problem, but in so doing they have created another potentially even bigger problem. It’s not yet clear what will be the consequences of all the borrowing and printing that financed the bailout, and it’s thus way, way too early for the pro-bailout folks to declare victory.
November 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM #631880UCGal
ParticipantDon’t forget his $5 Billion in Goldman Sachs preferred stock.
Goldman has benefited every step of the government bank bailout process.
November 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM #631957UCGal
ParticipantDon’t forget his $5 Billion in Goldman Sachs preferred stock.
Goldman has benefited every step of the government bank bailout process.
November 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM #632531UCGal
ParticipantDon’t forget his $5 Billion in Goldman Sachs preferred stock.
Goldman has benefited every step of the government bank bailout process.
November 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM #632658UCGal
ParticipantDon’t forget his $5 Billion in Goldman Sachs preferred stock.
Goldman has benefited every step of the government bank bailout process.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.