- This topic has 105 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Veritas.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 18, 2008 at 1:03 PM #272441September 18, 2008 at 1:23 PM #272135EugeneParticipant
The most recent occurrence of Marion I could find
http://piggington.com/ot_obama_vs_black_people
Sadly, I’ve missed the thread that finally got her deleted. But this one is entertaining and gives you the idea.
September 18, 2008 at 1:23 PM #272375EugeneParticipantThe most recent occurrence of Marion I could find
http://piggington.com/ot_obama_vs_black_people
Sadly, I’ve missed the thread that finally got her deleted. But this one is entertaining and gives you the idea.
September 18, 2008 at 1:23 PM #272382EugeneParticipantThe most recent occurrence of Marion I could find
http://piggington.com/ot_obama_vs_black_people
Sadly, I’ve missed the thread that finally got her deleted. But this one is entertaining and gives you the idea.
September 18, 2008 at 1:23 PM #272423EugeneParticipantThe most recent occurrence of Marion I could find
http://piggington.com/ot_obama_vs_black_people
Sadly, I’ve missed the thread that finally got her deleted. But this one is entertaining and gives you the idea.
September 18, 2008 at 1:23 PM #272446EugeneParticipantThe most recent occurrence of Marion I could find
http://piggington.com/ot_obama_vs_black_people
Sadly, I’ve missed the thread that finally got her deleted. But this one is entertaining and gives you the idea.
September 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM #272214urbanrealtorParticipantI found it (the thread that got her banned).
I really have to think about that.
The whole concept of unstated rules kind of bothers me. Then I am newer to the blogging thing and so maybe I need to learn more.
Still, it seems considering how much argument is tolerated and considered acceptable in these forums, there should be a published policy to define the line that is not to be crossed. If there is one, I have missed it. I looked only in TOU and FAQ.
That is my 2 bits.
Anyone else’s thoughts?September 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM #272455urbanrealtorParticipantI found it (the thread that got her banned).
I really have to think about that.
The whole concept of unstated rules kind of bothers me. Then I am newer to the blogging thing and so maybe I need to learn more.
Still, it seems considering how much argument is tolerated and considered acceptable in these forums, there should be a published policy to define the line that is not to be crossed. If there is one, I have missed it. I looked only in TOU and FAQ.
That is my 2 bits.
Anyone else’s thoughts?September 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM #272462urbanrealtorParticipantI found it (the thread that got her banned).
I really have to think about that.
The whole concept of unstated rules kind of bothers me. Then I am newer to the blogging thing and so maybe I need to learn more.
Still, it seems considering how much argument is tolerated and considered acceptable in these forums, there should be a published policy to define the line that is not to be crossed. If there is one, I have missed it. I looked only in TOU and FAQ.
That is my 2 bits.
Anyone else’s thoughts?September 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM #272503urbanrealtorParticipantI found it (the thread that got her banned).
I really have to think about that.
The whole concept of unstated rules kind of bothers me. Then I am newer to the blogging thing and so maybe I need to learn more.
Still, it seems considering how much argument is tolerated and considered acceptable in these forums, there should be a published policy to define the line that is not to be crossed. If there is one, I have missed it. I looked only in TOU and FAQ.
That is my 2 bits.
Anyone else’s thoughts?September 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM #272527urbanrealtorParticipantI found it (the thread that got her banned).
I really have to think about that.
The whole concept of unstated rules kind of bothers me. Then I am newer to the blogging thing and so maybe I need to learn more.
Still, it seems considering how much argument is tolerated and considered acceptable in these forums, there should be a published policy to define the line that is not to be crossed. If there is one, I have missed it. I looked only in TOU and FAQ.
That is my 2 bits.
Anyone else’s thoughts?September 18, 2008 at 3:27 PM #272225EugeneParticipantHow did you find it? It’s gone from piggington, it’s not on archive.org, and (as far as I can tell) it’s not in Google cache.
September 18, 2008 at 3:27 PM #272465EugeneParticipantHow did you find it? It’s gone from piggington, it’s not on archive.org, and (as far as I can tell) it’s not in Google cache.
September 18, 2008 at 3:27 PM #272471EugeneParticipantHow did you find it? It’s gone from piggington, it’s not on archive.org, and (as far as I can tell) it’s not in Google cache.
September 18, 2008 at 3:27 PM #272513EugeneParticipantHow did you find it? It’s gone from piggington, it’s not on archive.org, and (as far as I can tell) it’s not in Google cache.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.