OT – Whitman Hired Illegal Worker

[briansd1]

I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=briansd1]I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.[/quote]

Brian: What about those folks that pay lip service to unionization, proper immigration policies and environmental regulation, but completely ignore them in their personal business dealings? Like Nancy Pelosi.

I noticed you never answered my post about Pelosi, and her obvious (and well-documented) hypocrisy. Any reason? Other than her being a Dem, of course.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=briansd1]I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.[/quote]

Brian: What about those folks that pay lip service to unionization, proper immigration policies and environmental regulation, but completely ignore them in their personal business dealings? Like Nancy Pelosi.

I noticed you never answered my post about Pelosi, and her obvious (and well-documented) hypocrisy. Any reason? Other than her being a Dem, of course.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=briansd1]I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.[/quote]

Brian: What about those folks that pay lip service to unionization, proper immigration policies and environmental regulation, but completely ignore them in their personal business dealings? Like Nancy Pelosi.

I noticed you never answered my post about Pelosi, and her obvious (and well-documented) hypocrisy. Any reason? Other than her being a Dem, of course.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=briansd1]I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.[/quote]

Brian: What about those folks that pay lip service to unionization, proper immigration policies and environmental regulation, but completely ignore them in their personal business dealings? Like Nancy Pelosi.

I noticed you never answered my post about Pelosi, and her obvious (and well-documented) hypocrisy. Any reason? Other than her being a Dem, of course.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=briansd1]I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.[/quote]

Brian: What about those folks that pay lip service to unionization, proper immigration policies and environmental regulation, but completely ignore them in their personal business dealings? Like Nancy Pelosi.

I noticed you never answered my post about Pelosi, and her obvious (and well-documented) hypocrisy. Any reason? Other than her being a Dem, of course.

[briansd1]

I think that there is a qualitative difference between Whitman and Pelosi.

In Pelosi’s case, her husband is the business person. He’s not running for office.

In Whitman’s case, she’s the business person. She’s running for office. Whitman’s fortune is many multiples that of Pelosi’s; so Whitman’s business dealings are more relevant to her political positions.

[briansd1]

I think that there is a qualitative difference between Whitman and Pelosi.

In Pelosi’s case, her husband is the business person. He’s not running for office.

In Whitman’s case, she’s the business person. She’s running for office. Whitman’s fortune is many multiples that of Pelosi’s; so Whitman’s business dealings are more relevant to her political positions.

[briansd1]

I think that there is a qualitative difference between Whitman and Pelosi.

In Pelosi’s case, her husband is the business person. He’s not running for office.

In Whitman’s case, she’s the business person. She’s running for office. Whitman’s fortune is many multiples that of Pelosi’s; so Whitman’s business dealings are more relevant to her political positions.

[briansd1]

I think that there is a qualitative difference between Whitman and Pelosi.

In Pelosi’s case, her husband is the business person. He’s not running for office.

In Whitman’s case, she’s the business person. She’s running for office. Whitman’s fortune is many multiples that of Pelosi’s; so Whitman’s business dealings are more relevant to her political positions.

[briansd1]

I think that there is a qualitative difference between Whitman and Pelosi.

In Pelosi’s case, her husband is the business person. He’s not running for office.

In Whitman’s case, she’s the business person. She’s running for office. Whitman’s fortune is many multiples that of Pelosi’s; so Whitman’s business dealings are more relevant to her political positions.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Does anyone know if those paid sign holders holding signs that say “Shame on XYZ” unionized?

[enron_by_the_sea]

Does anyone know if those paid sign holders holding signs that say “Shame on XYZ” unionized?

[enron_by_the_sea]

Does anyone know if those paid sign holders holding signs that say “Shame on XYZ” unionized?

[enron_by_the_sea]

Does anyone know if those paid sign holders holding signs that say “Shame on XYZ” unionized?

[Author]

Posts