OT – Whitman Hired Illegal Worker

[davelj]

[quote=kev374]Meg Whitman is a greedy whore, nothing else. She cares about nobody else but the greedy good for nothing executive layer of companies who want to chase cheaper labor at the cost of the company and the quality of it’s products so that they can just collect their bonuses.

Meg Whitman has clearly stated that she wants to eliminate the H1b visa cap and bring in unlimited amounts of cheap labor…SHAME on her! She is not only a disgrace to humanity, she is a disgrace to this country.[/quote]

She wants to eliminate the H1b visa cap and bring in unlimited amounts of cheap labor? That greedy whore might just get my vote after all!

[gandalf]

JP, that’s kind of what I was saying too. Meg Whitman’s been going around campaigning against the ‘illegal’ problem at the same time she’s employing illegals. That’s the rub. She’s a hypocrite.

And as for her story, JP makes another good point. If she cared about the issue, she would have ‘found out’. More likely, she made a point of ‘not knowing’, as is the custom in the boardroom. Looking the other way speaks volumes about what she’d do as governor. Meg is a sleaze.

Personally, I don’t care about illegal immigration. There are costs associated with illegal immigration, healthcare, education and other public services for example. There are also economic benefits, cheap labor pool for agriculture, tourism and construction, lower consumer prices. The ‘Drug War’ is a different issue and Americans deserve some of the blame for ‘using’ so much ‘product’.

Again, I just think we have bigger problems, economy, public finance, energy, water, etc. But I agree, this sideshow shines a light on Meg’s character.

[gandalf]

JP, that’s kind of what I was saying too. Meg Whitman’s been going around campaigning against the ‘illegal’ problem at the same time she’s employing illegals. That’s the rub. She’s a hypocrite.

And as for her story, JP makes another good point. If she cared about the issue, she would have ‘found out’. More likely, she made a point of ‘not knowing’, as is the custom in the boardroom. Looking the other way speaks volumes about what she’d do as governor. Meg is a sleaze.

Personally, I don’t care about illegal immigration. There are costs associated with illegal immigration, healthcare, education and other public services for example. There are also economic benefits, cheap labor pool for agriculture, tourism and construction, lower consumer prices. The ‘Drug War’ is a different issue and Americans deserve some of the blame for ‘using’ so much ‘product’.

Again, I just think we have bigger problems, economy, public finance, energy, water, etc. But I agree, this sideshow shines a light on Meg’s character.

[gandalf]

JP, that’s kind of what I was saying too. Meg Whitman’s been going around campaigning against the ‘illegal’ problem at the same time she’s employing illegals. That’s the rub. She’s a hypocrite.

And as for her story, JP makes another good point. If she cared about the issue, she would have ‘found out’. More likely, she made a point of ‘not knowing’, as is the custom in the boardroom. Looking the other way speaks volumes about what she’d do as governor. Meg is a sleaze.

Personally, I don’t care about illegal immigration. There are costs associated with illegal immigration, healthcare, education and other public services for example. There are also economic benefits, cheap labor pool for agriculture, tourism and construction, lower consumer prices. The ‘Drug War’ is a different issue and Americans deserve some of the blame for ‘using’ so much ‘product’.

Again, I just think we have bigger problems, economy, public finance, energy, water, etc. But I agree, this sideshow shines a light on Meg’s character.

[gandalf]

JP, that’s kind of what I was saying too. Meg Whitman’s been going around campaigning against the ‘illegal’ problem at the same time she’s employing illegals. That’s the rub. She’s a hypocrite.

And as for her story, JP makes another good point. If she cared about the issue, she would have ‘found out’. More likely, she made a point of ‘not knowing’, as is the custom in the boardroom. Looking the other way speaks volumes about what she’d do as governor. Meg is a sleaze.

Personally, I don’t care about illegal immigration. There are costs associated with illegal immigration, healthcare, education and other public services for example. There are also economic benefits, cheap labor pool for agriculture, tourism and construction, lower consumer prices. The ‘Drug War’ is a different issue and Americans deserve some of the blame for ‘using’ so much ‘product’.

Again, I just think we have bigger problems, economy, public finance, energy, water, etc. But I agree, this sideshow shines a light on Meg’s character.

[gandalf]

JP, that’s kind of what I was saying too. Meg Whitman’s been going around campaigning against the ‘illegal’ problem at the same time she’s employing illegals. That’s the rub. She’s a hypocrite.

And as for her story, JP makes another good point. If she cared about the issue, she would have ‘found out’. More likely, she made a point of ‘not knowing’, as is the custom in the boardroom. Looking the other way speaks volumes about what she’d do as governor. Meg is a sleaze.

Personally, I don’t care about illegal immigration. There are costs associated with illegal immigration, healthcare, education and other public services for example. There are also economic benefits, cheap labor pool for agriculture, tourism and construction, lower consumer prices. The ‘Drug War’ is a different issue and Americans deserve some of the blame for ‘using’ so much ‘product’.

Again, I just think we have bigger problems, economy, public finance, energy, water, etc. But I agree, this sideshow shines a light on Meg’s character.

[Aecetia]

It’s called plausible deniability- “A condition in which a subject can safely and believeably deny knowledge of any particular truth that may exist because the subject is deliberately made unaware of said truth so as to benefit or shield the subject from any responsibility associated through the knowledge of such truth.” It is done in government to protect the ruling elite.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=plausible%20deniability

[Aecetia]

It’s called plausible deniability- “A condition in which a subject can safely and believeably deny knowledge of any particular truth that may exist because the subject is deliberately made unaware of said truth so as to benefit or shield the subject from any responsibility associated through the knowledge of such truth.” It is done in government to protect the ruling elite.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=plausible%20deniability

[Aecetia]

It’s called plausible deniability- “A condition in which a subject can safely and believeably deny knowledge of any particular truth that may exist because the subject is deliberately made unaware of said truth so as to benefit or shield the subject from any responsibility associated through the knowledge of such truth.” It is done in government to protect the ruling elite.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=plausible%20deniability

[Aecetia]

It’s called plausible deniability- “A condition in which a subject can safely and believeably deny knowledge of any particular truth that may exist because the subject is deliberately made unaware of said truth so as to benefit or shield the subject from any responsibility associated through the knowledge of such truth.” It is done in government to protect the ruling elite.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=plausible%20deniability

[Aecetia]

It’s called plausible deniability- “A condition in which a subject can safely and believeably deny knowledge of any particular truth that may exist because the subject is deliberately made unaware of said truth so as to benefit or shield the subject from any responsibility associated through the knowledge of such truth.” It is done in government to protect the ruling elite.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=plausible%20deniability

[briansd1]

I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.

[briansd1]

I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.

[briansd1]

I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.

[briansd1]

I actually know quite a few folks who are vociferously anti-immigration but choose to look away and ignore the facts because it’s convenient for them.

[Author]

Posts