- This topic has 570 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 30, 2010 at 7:07 AM #612107September 30, 2010 at 7:10 AM #611051
investor
Participant[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.September 30, 2010 at 7:10 AM #611138investor
Participant[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.September 30, 2010 at 7:10 AM #611682investor
Participant[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.September 30, 2010 at 7:10 AM #611796investor
Participant[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.September 30, 2010 at 7:10 AM #612112investor
Participant[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.September 30, 2010 at 7:19 AM #611056investor
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]
hahaha, that’s a really good one.
That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.
That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.September 30, 2010 at 7:19 AM #611143investor
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]
hahaha, that’s a really good one.
That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.
That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.September 30, 2010 at 7:19 AM #611687investor
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]
hahaha, that’s a really good one.
That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.
That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.September 30, 2010 at 7:19 AM #611801investor
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]
hahaha, that’s a really good one.
That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.
That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.September 30, 2010 at 7:19 AM #612117investor
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]
hahaha, that’s a really good one.
That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.
That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.September 30, 2010 at 7:34 AM #611066Hobie
ParticipantI would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.
September 30, 2010 at 7:34 AM #611153Hobie
ParticipantI would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.
September 30, 2010 at 7:34 AM #611697Hobie
ParticipantI would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.
September 30, 2010 at 7:34 AM #611811Hobie
ParticipantI would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.