OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools

[sdduuuude]

[quote=CA renter]The people making those decisions are almost always elected or appointed politicians and their chosen administrators. In case you haven’t noticed, most of them are bought/owned by corporations. Unions/teachers have far less to do with this than corporations, special interest groups, think tanks, etc. — people who work outside of government. [/quote]

As always, you group “Unions” in with “government”

Unions are private orgainzations attempting to appear as if they are working for the “common good” when in fact they are working solely for the benefit of their members.

[CA renter]

No, I specifically said that other people group unions with government.

From my previous comment on this thread:

[quote=CA renter]
People like to demonize “the government” and rank-and-file union workers as though they are one and the same. They are not.[/quote]

Nobody ever said that unions were public entities that work for the “common good,” outside of the fact that they represent the interests of workers (the common man) and provide a counterbalance to capitalist interests.

In the case of direct government workers, the unions strive to eliminate the middleman (private contractors/corporations) and the profit motive for shareholders and executives, thereby providing better compensation for the people who do the actual work.

And guess who’s leading the attack on unions? The private corporations who stand to benefit from the demise of the unions. They are NOT taxpayer advocates. They are working, as we speak, on new and more “innovative” ways to INCREASE public spending and to enhance the bond market so that governments can more easily borrow MORE money.

And if they succeed in destroying the unions, the only losers will be workers (of all stripes, public and private) and taxpayers. So, unions most certainly represent the common good to a far greater degree than the capitalists who only represent the interests of the wealthy and powerful.

Research the Privatization Movement if you don’t believe what I’m saying. It is very deep, and very dark.

[paramount]

[quote=SK in CV] Hence, you’re homophobic. I’m not sure why you won’t just acknowledge it. Your words make it pretty clear.[/quote]

It’s amazing how deeply the gay agenda has brainwashed the masses.

The message is: If you don’t agree with or embrace my view of homosexuality or how it’s being taught, you must be a homophobe and a hater. Or a troll. Or whatever.

Stop imposing your secular progressive religion on others.

Why not learn to exercise some tolerance for the views others might have without the need for personal attacks.

[spdrun]

Time was when people said the same thing about Blacks marrying Whites, and Jews leaving the ghetto. Those damn freedom riders, brainwashing the unwashed masses!

[SK in CV]

[quote=paramount][quote=SK in CV] Hence, you’re homophobic. I’m not sure why you won’t just acknowledge it. Your words make it pretty clear.[/quote]

It’s amazing how deeply the gay agenda has brainwashed the masses.

The message is: If you don’t agree with or embrace my view of homosexuality or how it’s being taught, you must be a homophobe and a hater. Or a troll. Or whatever.

Stop imposing your secular progressive religion on others.

Why not learn to exercise some tolerance for the views others might have without the need for personal attacks.[/quote]

I don’t have any desire to impose any religious views on others. I’m pretty much a non-believer in everything. It’s you that is attempting to impose your views. The agenda is all yours.

By the way, I’m still waiting for an explanation of how your child was harmed by what you described.

[afx114]

This thread is gay.

[scaredyclassic]

marriage is totally gay.

[scaredyclassic]

(the onion sells a tshirt that says that)

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=paramount][quote=SK in CV] Hence, you’re homophobic. I’m not sure why you won’t just acknowledge it. Your words make it pretty clear.[/quote]

It’s amazing how deeply the gay agenda has brainwashed the masses.

The message is: If you don’t agree with or embrace my view of homosexuality or how it’s being taught, you must be a homophobe and a hater. Or a troll. Or whatever.

Stop imposing your secular progressive religion on others.

Why not learn to exercise some tolerance for the views others might have without the need for personal attacks.[/quote]

I have missed Paramount’s posts soooo much.

Damn.

My thoughts:

1: AFX is gay (his wife told me).

2: Rich is gay (which is why he drives a gay car and has like 2% body fat).

3: Paramount is gayer than anyone else here. But closeted.

4: I mean seriously:
Who cares?
My sons are 2 and 5 years old.
Each has friends with same sex parents.
Kids are always interested in that shit.
One of my agents (who has a kid at the daycare where my younger son goes) describes his 4-year-old’s best friend shouting “but he NEEDS a mommy!!” (cuz my agent is a homo).
The same girl once asked me where my hair had gone.
Kids pay attention to things (including family structure).
It happens.
Last I checked this did not lead either of my sons to don a leather harness or a ball gag.
However, the visual that creates does make me giggle.

Paramount, stay in Temecula and let us decent folk get on with our lives free of ignorant people who think they are moral (when they aren’t).

Your version of morality is nuts and a pretty good example of why having kids should require a license.

[urbanrealtor]

Also, “secular progressive religion” is your best counter?

And truly, if you ever meet Rich in person, you will find his youthful appearance striking and upsetting.

Very creepy.

[CA renter]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

And truly, if you ever meet Rich in person, you will find his youthful appearance striking and upsetting.

Very creepy.[/quote]

He literally looks half his age. It’s pretty incredible. He could make billions of dollars if he could market whatever it is that he does (probably genes, though).

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=paramount][quote=SK in CV] Hence, you’re homophobic. I’m not sure why you won’t just acknowledge it. Your words make it pretty clear.[/quote]

It’s amazing how deeply the gay agenda has brainwashed the masses.

The message is: If you don’t agree with or embrace my view of homosexuality or how it’s being taught, you must be a homophobe and a hater. Or a troll. Or whatever.

Stop imposing your secular progressive religion on others.

Why not learn to exercise some tolerance for the views others might have without the need for personal attacks.[/quote]

I have missed Paramount’s posts soooo much.

Damn.

My thoughts:

1: AFX is gay (his wife told me).

2: Rich is gay (which is why he drives a gay car and has like 2% body fat).

3: Paramount is gayer than anyone else here. But closeted.

4: I mean seriously:
Who cares?
My sons are 2 and 5 years old.
Each has friends with same sex parents.
Kids are always interested in that shit.
One of my agents (who has a kid at the daycare where my younger son goes) describes his 4-year-old’s best friend shouting “but he NEEDS a mommy!!” (cuz my agent is a homo).
The same girl once asked me where my hair had gone.
Kids pay attention to things (including family structure).
It happens.
Last I checked this did not lead either of my sons to don a leather harness or a ball gag.
However, the visual that creates does make me giggle.

Paramount, stay in Temecula and let us decent folk get on with our lives free of ignorant people who think they are moral (when they aren’t).

Your version of morality is nuts and a pretty good example of why having kids should require a license.[/quote]

actually, more than a few of my kids’ public school teachers feel free to occasionally mention G.d n’ Jesus in the classroom. They my kids) wouldn’t let me complain. It is a little different here….

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

I have missed Paramount’s posts soooo much.

Damn.

My thoughts:

1: AFX is gay (his wife told me).

2: Rich is gay (which is why he drives a gay car and has like 2% body fat).

3: Paramount is gayer than anyone else here. But closeted.

4: I mean seriously:
Who cares?
My sons are 2 and 5 years old.
Each has friends with same sex parents.
Kids are always interested in that shit.
One of my agents (who has a kid at the daycare where my younger son goes) describes his 4-year-old’s best friend shouting “but he NEEDS a mommy!!” (cuz my agent is a homo).
The same girl once asked me where my hair had gone.
Kids pay attention to things (including family structure).
It happens.
Last I checked this did not lead either of my sons to don a leather harness or a ball gag.
However, the visual that creates does make me giggle.

Paramount, stay in Temecula and let us decent folk get on with our lives free of ignorant people who think they are moral (when they aren’t).

Your version of morality is nuts and a pretty good example of why having kids should require a license.[/quote]

Ha! Dan, I’ve been hoping you’d bring your talents to bear on this thread… that was worth the wait.

[NotCranky]

Paramount is not a troll. he just says that anyone who disagrees with him is a homosexual pedophile. Perfectly logical if you are paranoid.

What’s the difference if the kids learn about religious cultures or that some humans pair bond with the same sex? I wish we had a large religion and philosophy survey curricula starting in kindergarten. Anthropology too…then all the kids who are going to drop out could get the good stuff first.

[NotCranky]

Anyone would know this thread would bring Dan out. It’s just a question of how out.

[Author]

Posts