OT probabilty problem.

[NotCranky]

It’s definitely TG. The oscar vince lombardi concept is just too significant to do otherwise. My wife is cracking up with me here.

I can just hear my neighbors…Gee rustico why’n’tarnation did you name that rooster Temegulaguy instead of Jamulguy.

[Shadowfax]

[quote=Rustico]It’s definitely TG. The oscar vince lombardi concept is just too significant to do otherwise. My wife is cracking up with me here.

I can just hear my neighbors…Gee rustico why’n’tarnation did you name that rooster Temegulaguy instead of Jamulguy.

[/quote]

Can’t imagine what the neighbors would think if you named him “gandalf.”

Ok, city slicker here, but who got the questionable honor of checking the chickens’ anatomy to separate the girls from the boys? Eeeew.

[Shadowfax]

[quote=Rustico]It’s definitely TG. The oscar vince lombardi concept is just too significant to do otherwise. My wife is cracking up with me here.

I can just hear my neighbors…Gee rustico why’n’tarnation did you name that rooster Temegulaguy instead of Jamulguy.

[/quote]

Can’t imagine what the neighbors would think if you named him “gandalf.”

Ok, city slicker here, but who got the questionable honor of checking the chickens’ anatomy to separate the girls from the boys? Eeeew.

[Shadowfax]

[quote=Rustico]It’s definitely TG. The oscar vince lombardi concept is just too significant to do otherwise. My wife is cracking up with me here.

I can just hear my neighbors…Gee rustico why’n’tarnation did you name that rooster Temegulaguy instead of Jamulguy.

[/quote]

Can’t imagine what the neighbors would think if you named him “gandalf.”

Ok, city slicker here, but who got the questionable honor of checking the chickens’ anatomy to separate the girls from the boys? Eeeew.

[Shadowfax]

[quote=Rustico]It’s definitely TG. The oscar vince lombardi concept is just too significant to do otherwise. My wife is cracking up with me here.

I can just hear my neighbors…Gee rustico why’n’tarnation did you name that rooster Temegulaguy instead of Jamulguy.

[/quote]

Can’t imagine what the neighbors would think if you named him “gandalf.”

Ok, city slicker here, but who got the questionable honor of checking the chickens’ anatomy to separate the girls from the boys? Eeeew.

[Shadowfax]

[quote=Rustico]It’s definitely TG. The oscar vince lombardi concept is just too significant to do otherwise. My wife is cracking up with me here.

I can just hear my neighbors…Gee rustico why’n’tarnation did you name that rooster Temegulaguy instead of Jamulguy.

[/quote]

Can’t imagine what the neighbors would think if you named him “gandalf.”

Ok, city slicker here, but who got the questionable honor of checking the chickens’ anatomy to separate the girls from the boys? Eeeew.

[gandalf]

Pretty funny! Interesting about the chicks. Temecula Guy wins it, good joke about the tropies.

So the allegory would be… Mary Ann is Fannie, Ginger is Freddie, Temecula Guy is a giant mortgage bailout and he prefers both?

[gandalf]

Pretty funny! Interesting about the chicks. Temecula Guy wins it, good joke about the tropies.

So the allegory would be… Mary Ann is Fannie, Ginger is Freddie, Temecula Guy is a giant mortgage bailout and he prefers both?

[gandalf]

Pretty funny! Interesting about the chicks. Temecula Guy wins it, good joke about the tropies.

So the allegory would be… Mary Ann is Fannie, Ginger is Freddie, Temecula Guy is a giant mortgage bailout and he prefers both?

[gandalf]

Pretty funny! Interesting about the chicks. Temecula Guy wins it, good joke about the tropies.

So the allegory would be… Mary Ann is Fannie, Ginger is Freddie, Temecula Guy is a giant mortgage bailout and he prefers both?

[gandalf]

Pretty funny! Interesting about the chicks. Temecula Guy wins it, good joke about the tropies.

So the allegory would be… Mary Ann is Fannie, Ginger is Freddie, Temecula Guy is a giant mortgage bailout and he prefers both?

[ucodegen]

The probability problem needs clarification. Were the 8 baby chicks picked from a large (virtually infinite) litter of chicks that were stochastically sexed (Demming process control type) at a rate of 95% hens?

Open (virtually infinite) sets have different probabilities than closed (choosing from a set of which is 95% hens – sexing operation 100% accurate) In this case, the set you are selecting from has to have more than 100 chicks because 6 are roosters, but your sexing showed 5 out of 100 as roosters.

For the first, you have 5 out of 100 (20) raised to the 6th power multiplied by 95 out of 100 (1.0526315) raised to the 2nd power, divided by the number of ways you can select 2 of one kind and 6 of another out of 8 (# of combinations).

Crap.. my calculator does not have a factorial button. longhand time…

Ok.. the odds of getting a group of 6 roosters followed by 2 hens from a pull of an infinite group of chicks is 1 out of 1108033.24099…

There are 28 different ways you can get 6 roosters and 2 hens from a pull of 8 chicks.. meaning that odds of getting 6 roosters and 2 hens from an endless pile of little clucks sexed at 95% hen is 1 out of 39572.6157

[ucodegen]

The probability problem needs clarification. Were the 8 baby chicks picked from a large (virtually infinite) litter of chicks that were stochastically sexed (Demming process control type) at a rate of 95% hens?

Open (virtually infinite) sets have different probabilities than closed (choosing from a set of which is 95% hens – sexing operation 100% accurate) In this case, the set you are selecting from has to have more than 100 chicks because 6 are roosters, but your sexing showed 5 out of 100 as roosters.

For the first, you have 5 out of 100 (20) raised to the 6th power multiplied by 95 out of 100 (1.0526315) raised to the 2nd power, divided by the number of ways you can select 2 of one kind and 6 of another out of 8 (# of combinations).

Crap.. my calculator does not have a factorial button. longhand time…

Ok.. the odds of getting a group of 6 roosters followed by 2 hens from a pull of an infinite group of chicks is 1 out of 1108033.24099…

There are 28 different ways you can get 6 roosters and 2 hens from a pull of 8 chicks.. meaning that odds of getting 6 roosters and 2 hens from an endless pile of little clucks sexed at 95% hen is 1 out of 39572.6157

[ucodegen]

The probability problem needs clarification. Were the 8 baby chicks picked from a large (virtually infinite) litter of chicks that were stochastically sexed (Demming process control type) at a rate of 95% hens?

Open (virtually infinite) sets have different probabilities than closed (choosing from a set of which is 95% hens – sexing operation 100% accurate) In this case, the set you are selecting from has to have more than 100 chicks because 6 are roosters, but your sexing showed 5 out of 100 as roosters.

For the first, you have 5 out of 100 (20) raised to the 6th power multiplied by 95 out of 100 (1.0526315) raised to the 2nd power, divided by the number of ways you can select 2 of one kind and 6 of another out of 8 (# of combinations).

Crap.. my calculator does not have a factorial button. longhand time…

Ok.. the odds of getting a group of 6 roosters followed by 2 hens from a pull of an infinite group of chicks is 1 out of 1108033.24099…

There are 28 different ways you can get 6 roosters and 2 hens from a pull of 8 chicks.. meaning that odds of getting 6 roosters and 2 hens from an endless pile of little clucks sexed at 95% hen is 1 out of 39572.6157

[ucodegen]

The probability problem needs clarification. Were the 8 baby chicks picked from a large (virtually infinite) litter of chicks that were stochastically sexed (Demming process control type) at a rate of 95% hens?

Open (virtually infinite) sets have different probabilities than closed (choosing from a set of which is 95% hens – sexing operation 100% accurate) In this case, the set you are selecting from has to have more than 100 chicks because 6 are roosters, but your sexing showed 5 out of 100 as roosters.

For the first, you have 5 out of 100 (20) raised to the 6th power multiplied by 95 out of 100 (1.0526315) raised to the 2nd power, divided by the number of ways you can select 2 of one kind and 6 of another out of 8 (# of combinations).

Crap.. my calculator does not have a factorial button. longhand time…

Ok.. the odds of getting a group of 6 roosters followed by 2 hens from a pull of an infinite group of chicks is 1 out of 1108033.24099…

There are 28 different ways you can get 6 roosters and 2 hens from a pull of 8 chicks.. meaning that odds of getting 6 roosters and 2 hens from an endless pile of little clucks sexed at 95% hen is 1 out of 39572.6157

[Author]

Posts