Menu

Home › Forums › Other › OT- More Government Control

Viewing 11 posts - 271 through 281 (of 281 total)
1 2 3 … 17 18 19
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 12, 2009 at 5:33 PM #444882
    Allan from Fallbrook
    Participant

    [quote=Aecetia]Off topic for Allan,
    hey any more Gaiman recommendations?[/quote]

    Aecetia: Nothing new on the Gaiman front (I think he has something due out, but I haven’t seen it yet).

    I’ve been reading an author named China Mieville lately. He has a series called the Bas-Lag about a fictional city named New Crobuzon. It’s a little out there, but I’m enjoying it. Do a little research and see what you think. He may not be your cup of tea.

    August 15, 2009 at 8:55 PM #445058
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

    What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

    (f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

    And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

    ‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

    ‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

    ‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

    EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

    1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

    2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

    August 15, 2009 at 8:55 PM #445251
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

    What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

    (f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

    And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

    ‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

    ‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

    ‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

    EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

    1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

    2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

    August 15, 2009 at 8:55 PM #445589
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

    What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

    (f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

    And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

    ‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

    ‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

    ‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

    EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

    1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

    2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

    August 15, 2009 at 8:55 PM #445661
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

    What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

    (f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

    And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

    ‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

    ‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

    ‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

    EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

    1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

    2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

    August 15, 2009 at 8:55 PM #445842
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

    What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

    (f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

    And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

    ‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

    ‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

    ‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

    EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

    1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

    2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

    August 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM #445633
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Update- Following a furor over how the data would be used, the White House has shut down an electronic tip box — [email protected] — that was set up to receive information on “fishy” claims about President Barack Obama’s health plan.

    E-mails to that address now bounce back with the message: “The e-mail address you just sent a message to is no longer in service. We are now accepting your feedback about health insurance reform via http://www.whitehouse.gov/realitycheck.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26188.html#ixzz0OTKHKPQW

    August 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM #445824
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Update- Following a furor over how the data would be used, the White House has shut down an electronic tip box — [email protected] — that was set up to receive information on “fishy” claims about President Barack Obama’s health plan.

    E-mails to that address now bounce back with the message: “The e-mail address you just sent a message to is no longer in service. We are now accepting your feedback about health insurance reform via http://www.whitehouse.gov/realitycheck.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26188.html#ixzz0OTKHKPQW

    August 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM #446164
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Update- Following a furor over how the data would be used, the White House has shut down an electronic tip box — [email protected] — that was set up to receive information on “fishy” claims about President Barack Obama’s health plan.

    E-mails to that address now bounce back with the message: “The e-mail address you just sent a message to is no longer in service. We are now accepting your feedback about health insurance reform via http://www.whitehouse.gov/realitycheck.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26188.html#ixzz0OTKHKPQW

    August 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM #446235
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Update- Following a furor over how the data would be used, the White House has shut down an electronic tip box — [email protected] — that was set up to receive information on “fishy” claims about President Barack Obama’s health plan.

    E-mails to that address now bounce back with the message: “The e-mail address you just sent a message to is no longer in service. We are now accepting your feedback about health insurance reform via http://www.whitehouse.gov/realitycheck.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26188.html#ixzz0OTKHKPQW

    August 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM #446416
    Zeitgeist
    Participant

    Update- Following a furor over how the data would be used, the White House has shut down an electronic tip box — [email protected] — that was set up to receive information on “fishy” claims about President Barack Obama’s health plan.

    E-mails to that address now bounce back with the message: “The e-mail address you just sent a message to is no longer in service. We are now accepting your feedback about health insurance reform via http://www.whitehouse.gov/realitycheck.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26188.html#ixzz0OTKHKPQW

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 271 through 281 (of 281 total)
1 2 3 … 17 18 19
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.