- This topic has 473 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 17, 2010 at 6:43 PM #607151September 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #606088
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
September 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #606175Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
September 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #606730Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
September 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #606837Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
September 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #607156Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
September 17, 2010 at 7:27 PM #606098Aecetia
ParticipantExcept when you agree with them. Face it, he is going down in flames. It’s Reagan, not Regan.
September 17, 2010 at 7:27 PM #606185ParticipantExcept when you agree with them. Face it, he is going down in flames. It’s Reagan, not Regan.
September 17, 2010 at 7:27 PM #606741ParticipantExcept when you agree with them. Face it, he is going down in flames. It’s Reagan, not Regan.
September 17, 2010 at 7:27 PM #606847ParticipantExcept when you agree with them. Face it, he is going down in flames. It’s Reagan, not Regan.
September 17, 2010 at 7:27 PM #607166ParticipantExcept when you agree with them. Face it, he is going down in flames. It’s Reagan, not Regan.
September 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM #606128Eugene
Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
You know, when the poverty level is at the highest level since the 1960s and, despite several months of cajoling by the President, only 2 out of 40 or so Senators from a certain party vote in favor of a legislation that would extend unemployment benefits to many of those 43.6M working-age poor, one has to wonder whether the President is really the problem here.
September 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM #606215Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
You know, when the poverty level is at the highest level since the 1960s and, despite several months of cajoling by the President, only 2 out of 40 or so Senators from a certain party vote in favor of a legislation that would extend unemployment benefits to many of those 43.6M working-age poor, one has to wonder whether the President is really the problem here.
September 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM #606770Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
You know, when the poverty level is at the highest level since the 1960s and, despite several months of cajoling by the President, only 2 out of 40 or so Senators from a certain party vote in favor of a legislation that would extend unemployment benefits to many of those 43.6M working-age poor, one has to wonder whether the President is really the problem here.
September 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM #606877Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
You know, when the poverty level is at the highest level since the 1960s and, despite several months of cajoling by the President, only 2 out of 40 or so Senators from a certain party vote in favor of a legislation that would extend unemployment benefits to many of those 43.6M working-age poor, one has to wonder whether the President is really the problem here.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.