Menu

Home › Forums › Other › OT: Conservatives Revel In America’s Olympic Defeat

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 321 total)
1 2 3 … 13 14 15 … 20 21 22
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 5, 2009 at 3:30 PM #464850
    Allan from Fallbrook
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]

    We now find Rock-n-Roll perfectly acceptable but Conservatives in the 50s certainly didn’t.

    [/quote]

    Brian: Speaking of mores and Rock-n-Roll, wasn’t it Chicago PD busting hippie heads outside the DEMOCRATIC National Convention in 1968?

    Yeah. Thought so.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:05 PM #464045
    briansd1
    Guest

    Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:05 PM #464235
    briansd1
    Guest

    Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:05 PM #464584
    briansd1
    Guest

    Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:05 PM #464655
    briansd1
    Guest

    Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:05 PM #464859
    briansd1
    Guest

    Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM #464050
    Allan from Fallbrook
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.[/quote]

    Brian: Well, I don’t know who MLT was, but I would offer that many of those same protesters went on to completely fuck up our educational system.

    I’m curious about one thing, though: How come those protesters, who were so worried about the Vietnamese and the other people of Southeast Asia, how come they didn’t say anything at all when the genocide began there after we left?

    You know, Robert Scheer and Tom Haydn and the rest of those SDS types. Boy, they clammed right up, didn’t they? Talk about being on the wrong side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM #464240
    Allan from Fallbrook
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.[/quote]

    Brian: Well, I don’t know who MLT was, but I would offer that many of those same protesters went on to completely fuck up our educational system.

    I’m curious about one thing, though: How come those protesters, who were so worried about the Vietnamese and the other people of Southeast Asia, how come they didn’t say anything at all when the genocide began there after we left?

    You know, Robert Scheer and Tom Haydn and the rest of those SDS types. Boy, they clammed right up, didn’t they? Talk about being on the wrong side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM #464589
    Allan from Fallbrook
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.[/quote]

    Brian: Well, I don’t know who MLT was, but I would offer that many of those same protesters went on to completely fuck up our educational system.

    I’m curious about one thing, though: How come those protesters, who were so worried about the Vietnamese and the other people of Southeast Asia, how come they didn’t say anything at all when the genocide began there after we left?

    You know, Robert Scheer and Tom Haydn and the rest of those SDS types. Boy, they clammed right up, didn’t they? Talk about being on the wrong side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM #464661
    Allan from Fallbrook
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.[/quote]

    Brian: Well, I don’t know who MLT was, but I would offer that many of those same protesters went on to completely fuck up our educational system.

    I’m curious about one thing, though: How come those protesters, who were so worried about the Vietnamese and the other people of Southeast Asia, how come they didn’t say anything at all when the genocide began there after we left?

    You know, Robert Scheer and Tom Haydn and the rest of those SDS types. Boy, they clammed right up, didn’t they? Talk about being on the wrong side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM #464864
    Allan from Fallbrook
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]Allan, the 1968 incident happened because LBJ was on the wrong side of history for supporting the Vietnam War.

    Also the hopes of the Civil Rights movement were dashed by the assassinations of MLT and RFK.

    In the end, you’re either of the right of history or on the wrong side. I believe the protesters were on the right side of history.[/quote]

    Brian: Well, I don’t know who MLT was, but I would offer that many of those same protesters went on to completely fuck up our educational system.

    I’m curious about one thing, though: How come those protesters, who were so worried about the Vietnamese and the other people of Southeast Asia, how come they didn’t say anything at all when the genocide began there after we left?

    You know, Robert Scheer and Tom Haydn and the rest of those SDS types. Boy, they clammed right up, didn’t they? Talk about being on the wrong side of history.

    October 5, 2009 at 4:43 PM #464065
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]
    ucodegen, I don’t see an equivalent to Rush on the left — someone who despite his own personal failings still commands a huge fanatical audience.[/quote]

    Wow, I can name three of the top of my head that are liberal analogues to Rush, Hannity and Beck:

    Rachel Maddow
    Keith Olberman
    Al Franken

    I’ll throw in Paul Krugman as a bonus…

    October 5, 2009 at 4:43 PM #464255
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]
    ucodegen, I don’t see an equivalent to Rush on the left — someone who despite his own personal failings still commands a huge fanatical audience.[/quote]

    Wow, I can name three of the top of my head that are liberal analogues to Rush, Hannity and Beck:

    Rachel Maddow
    Keith Olberman
    Al Franken

    I’ll throw in Paul Krugman as a bonus…

    October 5, 2009 at 4:43 PM #464604
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]
    ucodegen, I don’t see an equivalent to Rush on the left — someone who despite his own personal failings still commands a huge fanatical audience.[/quote]

    Wow, I can name three of the top of my head that are liberal analogues to Rush, Hannity and Beck:

    Rachel Maddow
    Keith Olberman
    Al Franken

    I’ll throw in Paul Krugman as a bonus…

    October 5, 2009 at 4:43 PM #464673
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]
    ucodegen, I don’t see an equivalent to Rush on the left — someone who despite his own personal failings still commands a huge fanatical audience.[/quote]

    Wow, I can name three of the top of my head that are liberal analogues to Rush, Hannity and Beck:

    Rachel Maddow
    Keith Olberman
    Al Franken

    I’ll throw in Paul Krugman as a bonus…

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 321 total)
1 2 3 … 13 14 15 … 20 21 22
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.