- This topic has 445 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM #420838June 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM #420113
CoronitaParticipantGet ready for more payroll taxes.
in case you missed it, there are proposals to start taxing you on health care premiums that companies currently pay on your behalf over a certain limits as part of an employee “benefit”…
Hell, why doesn’t obama/dem just start taxing fat people more? They consume more, have a higher risk of health problems moving forward, consume more oxygen per second and exhume more CO2 per second…. (sarcasm).
June 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM #420345CoronitaParticipantGet ready for more payroll taxes.
in case you missed it, there are proposals to start taxing you on health care premiums that companies currently pay on your behalf over a certain limits as part of an employee “benefit”…
Hell, why doesn’t obama/dem just start taxing fat people more? They consume more, have a higher risk of health problems moving forward, consume more oxygen per second and exhume more CO2 per second…. (sarcasm).
June 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM #420616CoronitaParticipantGet ready for more payroll taxes.
in case you missed it, there are proposals to start taxing you on health care premiums that companies currently pay on your behalf over a certain limits as part of an employee “benefit”…
Hell, why doesn’t obama/dem just start taxing fat people more? They consume more, have a higher risk of health problems moving forward, consume more oxygen per second and exhume more CO2 per second…. (sarcasm).
June 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM #420682CoronitaParticipantGet ready for more payroll taxes.
in case you missed it, there are proposals to start taxing you on health care premiums that companies currently pay on your behalf over a certain limits as part of an employee “benefit”…
Hell, why doesn’t obama/dem just start taxing fat people more? They consume more, have a higher risk of health problems moving forward, consume more oxygen per second and exhume more CO2 per second…. (sarcasm).
June 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM #420843CoronitaParticipantGet ready for more payroll taxes.
in case you missed it, there are proposals to start taxing you on health care premiums that companies currently pay on your behalf over a certain limits as part of an employee “benefit”…
Hell, why doesn’t obama/dem just start taxing fat people more? They consume more, have a higher risk of health problems moving forward, consume more oxygen per second and exhume more CO2 per second…. (sarcasm).
June 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM #420118afx114
Participant[quote=DWCAP]I really would like to know where the big lies are coming in. [/quote]
I believe that GW is real, but from what I gather from the deniers is that they have a few problems with it:
– While global warming may be happening, it’s not human caused and is part of natural earth cycles.
– Even if it does exist and is caused by humans, it’s too expensive/not worth it to try and fix.
The first point can (and has) been answered and debunked by science. The second point? I think that’s the true position of the deniers. It’s a reasonable position, I just wish they would come out and say it rather than claim some global conspiracy spearheaded by megalomaniac Al Gore as the basis for their opposition to climate change reform.
June 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM #420350Participant[quote=DWCAP]I really would like to know where the big lies are coming in. [/quote]
I believe that GW is real, but from what I gather from the deniers is that they have a few problems with it:
– While global warming may be happening, it’s not human caused and is part of natural earth cycles.
– Even if it does exist and is caused by humans, it’s too expensive/not worth it to try and fix.
The first point can (and has) been answered and debunked by science. The second point? I think that’s the true position of the deniers. It’s a reasonable position, I just wish they would come out and say it rather than claim some global conspiracy spearheaded by megalomaniac Al Gore as the basis for their opposition to climate change reform.
June 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM #420621Participant[quote=DWCAP]I really would like to know where the big lies are coming in. [/quote]
I believe that GW is real, but from what I gather from the deniers is that they have a few problems with it:
– While global warming may be happening, it’s not human caused and is part of natural earth cycles.
– Even if it does exist and is caused by humans, it’s too expensive/not worth it to try and fix.
The first point can (and has) been answered and debunked by science. The second point? I think that’s the true position of the deniers. It’s a reasonable position, I just wish they would come out and say it rather than claim some global conspiracy spearheaded by megalomaniac Al Gore as the basis for their opposition to climate change reform.
June 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM #420687Participant[quote=DWCAP]I really would like to know where the big lies are coming in. [/quote]
I believe that GW is real, but from what I gather from the deniers is that they have a few problems with it:
– While global warming may be happening, it’s not human caused and is part of natural earth cycles.
– Even if it does exist and is caused by humans, it’s too expensive/not worth it to try and fix.
The first point can (and has) been answered and debunked by science. The second point? I think that’s the true position of the deniers. It’s a reasonable position, I just wish they would come out and say it rather than claim some global conspiracy spearheaded by megalomaniac Al Gore as the basis for their opposition to climate change reform.
June 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM #420848Participant[quote=DWCAP]I really would like to know where the big lies are coming in. [/quote]
I believe that GW is real, but from what I gather from the deniers is that they have a few problems with it:
– While global warming may be happening, it’s not human caused and is part of natural earth cycles.
– Even if it does exist and is caused by humans, it’s too expensive/not worth it to try and fix.
The first point can (and has) been answered and debunked by science. The second point? I think that’s the true position of the deniers. It’s a reasonable position, I just wish they would come out and say it rather than claim some global conspiracy spearheaded by megalomaniac Al Gore as the basis for their opposition to climate change reform.
June 25, 2009 at 12:55 PM #420133Casca
ParticipantCO2, plants need it to breath. It’s part of the mirical of photosynthesis. I pity the fool taught by a union-thug educrat.
June 25, 2009 at 12:55 PM #420365ParticipantCO2, plants need it to breath. It’s part of the mirical of photosynthesis. I pity the fool taught by a union-thug educrat.
June 25, 2009 at 12:55 PM #420636ParticipantCO2, plants need it to breath. It’s part of the mirical of photosynthesis. I pity the fool taught by a union-thug educrat.
June 25, 2009 at 12:55 PM #420702ParticipantCO2, plants need it to breath. It’s part of the mirical of photosynthesis. I pity the fool taught by a union-thug educrat.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.