OT: Bill Clinton is back. baby!

[socrattt]

I was just sitting on the pot thinking how could someone post such a ridiculous topic. Breeze if you think Bush is that dumb, I can only imagine your level of intelligence. Don’t get me wrong, you are probably raking in $8/hour at Pita Pit, but that doesn’t quite give you the knowledge and understanding of ex prez Clinton and Obama’s current economic advisers.

Please do some homework when you get off work. Does your manager know you spend this much time blogging about your superhero Obama! Hopefully your manager doesn’t have to take any extreme measures and fire employees. Chances are if he has to he will go out in the parking lot and look for Obama bumper stickers and those will be the first to go. Don’t take it for granted that you still have a job.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Socratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!

He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.

For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.

Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.

How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!

And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?

He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Socratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!

He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.

For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.

Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.

How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!

And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?

He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Socratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!

He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.

For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.

Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.

How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!

And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?

He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Socratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!

He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.

For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.

Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.

How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!

And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?

He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Socratt/Meadandale: Don’t go down the rabbit hole with this guy!

He is a completely propagandized little Lefty. To prove the point, ask him any serious question and see if he answers. He won’t.

For instance, and given his love of all things Clinton, ask him about Slick Willie’s forays into foreign policy and how those turned out, specifically in places like Somalia, the Balkans, Haiti and especially Iraq.

Ah, Iraq. Clinton and his administration were BIG believers in WMD. They also gave us wonderful pieces of legislation, like the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, right? What did that say again? Oh, yeah, it advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein, by any means, including invasion.

How about Clinton’s stance on torture, especially extraordinary rendition? What’s that? He started the policy of extraordinary rendition? No kidding!

And his signature on the NSA Echelon and Carnivore programs in 1994? You know the ones widely expanding governmental search capabilities into our private lives, including the widening of the 1978 FISA program?

He is either a troll or someone so blinded by the propaganda he doesn’t know any better and is therefore not up to the debate anyway. My advice is to let it go.

[Eugene]

[quote]I wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. [/quote]

Curious George was one of the worst presidents this country has seen. Already in 2000 it was obvious to anyone with half a brain. He’s less qualified to be the president than Sarah Palin.

[quote]Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics![/quote]

I thought it was 7 years of losing manufacturing jobs to Japan, followed by a stock market crash, followed by one of the worst recessions of the 20th century.

Gee what does that remind me of? Oh yes I know. By your logic, Obama’s group will ride the wave of good work (8 years of Bushonomics) that preceded them.

[quote]let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.[/quote]

Sitting ot the board does not make one responsible for ruining the company. If he were a CEO or a CFO, I might agree with you.

While we’re at it, why don’t you look up Henry Paulson (you know, the one appointed Treasury Secretary by Curious George) and find out who we was up until his appointment in 2006.

[Eugene]

[quote]I wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. [/quote]

Curious George was one of the worst presidents this country has seen. Already in 2000 it was obvious to anyone with half a brain. He’s less qualified to be the president than Sarah Palin.

[quote]Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics![/quote]

I thought it was 7 years of losing manufacturing jobs to Japan, followed by a stock market crash, followed by one of the worst recessions of the 20th century.

Gee what does that remind me of? Oh yes I know. By your logic, Obama’s group will ride the wave of good work (8 years of Bushonomics) that preceded them.

[quote]let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.[/quote]

Sitting ot the board does not make one responsible for ruining the company. If he were a CEO or a CFO, I might agree with you.

While we’re at it, why don’t you look up Henry Paulson (you know, the one appointed Treasury Secretary by Curious George) and find out who we was up until his appointment in 2006.

[Eugene]

[quote]I wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. [/quote]

Curious George was one of the worst presidents this country has seen. Already in 2000 it was obvious to anyone with half a brain. He’s less qualified to be the president than Sarah Palin.

[quote]Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics![/quote]

I thought it was 7 years of losing manufacturing jobs to Japan, followed by a stock market crash, followed by one of the worst recessions of the 20th century.

Gee what does that remind me of? Oh yes I know. By your logic, Obama’s group will ride the wave of good work (8 years of Bushonomics) that preceded them.

[quote]let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.[/quote]

Sitting ot the board does not make one responsible for ruining the company. If he were a CEO or a CFO, I might agree with you.

While we’re at it, why don’t you look up Henry Paulson (you know, the one appointed Treasury Secretary by Curious George) and find out who we was up until his appointment in 2006.

[Eugene]

[quote]I wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. [/quote]

Curious George was one of the worst presidents this country has seen. Already in 2000 it was obvious to anyone with half a brain. He’s less qualified to be the president than Sarah Palin.

[quote]Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics![/quote]

I thought it was 7 years of losing manufacturing jobs to Japan, followed by a stock market crash, followed by one of the worst recessions of the 20th century.

Gee what does that remind me of? Oh yes I know. By your logic, Obama’s group will ride the wave of good work (8 years of Bushonomics) that preceded them.

[quote]let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.[/quote]

Sitting ot the board does not make one responsible for ruining the company. If he were a CEO or a CFO, I might agree with you.

While we’re at it, why don’t you look up Henry Paulson (you know, the one appointed Treasury Secretary by Curious George) and find out who we was up until his appointment in 2006.

[Eugene]

[quote]I wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. [/quote]

Curious George was one of the worst presidents this country has seen. Already in 2000 it was obvious to anyone with half a brain. He’s less qualified to be the president than Sarah Palin.

[quote]Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics![/quote]

I thought it was 7 years of losing manufacturing jobs to Japan, followed by a stock market crash, followed by one of the worst recessions of the 20th century.

Gee what does that remind me of? Oh yes I know. By your logic, Obama’s group will ride the wave of good work (8 years of Bushonomics) that preceded them.

[quote]let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.[/quote]

Sitting ot the board does not make one responsible for ruining the company. If he were a CEO or a CFO, I might agree with you.

While we’re at it, why don’t you look up Henry Paulson (you know, the one appointed Treasury Secretary by Curious George) and find out who we was up until his appointment in 2006.

[Arraya]

Watching the Democrats in the final weeks of the presidential election has been a lesson in revisionist history. While they lament the terrible crimes perpetrated against the American people by George Bush and vow to keep fighting for our rights, they conveniently gloss over the fact that they have no standing to make such claims. Indeed, the Democrats, including Senator Barack Obama, have actually voted with President Bush’s agenda, making them complicit in his acts, not valiant opponents defending our liberties.

http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez10292008.html

[Arraya]

Watching the Democrats in the final weeks of the presidential election has been a lesson in revisionist history. While they lament the terrible crimes perpetrated against the American people by George Bush and vow to keep fighting for our rights, they conveniently gloss over the fact that they have no standing to make such claims. Indeed, the Democrats, including Senator Barack Obama, have actually voted with President Bush’s agenda, making them complicit in his acts, not valiant opponents defending our liberties.

http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez10292008.html

[Arraya]

Watching the Democrats in the final weeks of the presidential election has been a lesson in revisionist history. While they lament the terrible crimes perpetrated against the American people by George Bush and vow to keep fighting for our rights, they conveniently gloss over the fact that they have no standing to make such claims. Indeed, the Democrats, including Senator Barack Obama, have actually voted with President Bush’s agenda, making them complicit in his acts, not valiant opponents defending our liberties.

http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez10292008.html

[Arraya]

Watching the Democrats in the final weeks of the presidential election has been a lesson in revisionist history. While they lament the terrible crimes perpetrated against the American people by George Bush and vow to keep fighting for our rights, they conveniently gloss over the fact that they have no standing to make such claims. Indeed, the Democrats, including Senator Barack Obama, have actually voted with President Bush’s agenda, making them complicit in his acts, not valiant opponents defending our liberties.

http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez10292008.html

[Author]

Posts